GT Sport vs Other Games: Comparison Video Thread
- Thread starter GTPNewsWire
- 2,529 comments
- 214,971 views
- 1,427
- Italy
I'm sure if @emula tried I'm sure he could make FM7 look even worse. Here's what a similar shot looks like on my Xbox. I'd recommend clicking the image to see it full size so you can appreciate the detail. And I can promise you this pic does not do the game justice, on my 4K HDR OLED TV the game looks incredible.
I'm sorting a GTS shot for comparison as we speak.
oneX... 500$ console and still GTS looks a lot better
PS is not the same car
- 6,838
- Europe
- GTP_Slim
- PzR Slim
Couple of pics of the same car. It's difficult to get the lighting right to be fair to both games. The pics don't do either game justice. They both look significantly better in HDR.
And for completeness here's PC2. Different car I know but best I can do!
oneX... 500$ console and still GTS looks a lot better
PS is not the same car
I've never once said that FM7 looks better than GTS. GTS is the better looking game, it's lighting engine in particular is second to none. I was merely pointing out the lengths that you will go to to make FM7 look bad. It's really very sad. Some of us can can enjoy the fantastic graphics that all the main racing titles offer and don't have this almost fanatical mindset.
Last edited:
- 14,430
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
If this is all your going to do when you PRETEND that you're coming in making fair comparisons, than it's absolutely stupid in every form. You're the biggest hypocrite ever, a liar, and have no intention in being truthful and honest in any way, shape, or form.oneX... 500$ console and still GTS looks a lot better
PS is not the same car
FPV MIC
Premium
- 4,284
- Australia
- GT-MIC
Both games look outstanding IMO. The one difference that I take from these comparisons (GT Sport only) compared to the other similar one (by @emula) is that from race day to TT mode the background cars and tents are gone, as you would expect on a test day.Couple of pics of the same car. It's difficult to get the lighting right to be fair to both games. The pics don't do either game justice. They both look significantly better in HDR.
- 1,427
- Italy
Couple of pics of the same car. It's difficult to get the lighting right to be fair to both games. The pics don't do either game justice. They both look significantly better in HDR.
And for completeness here's PC2. Different car I know but best I can do!
I've never once said that FM7 looks better than GTS. GTS is the better looking game, it's lighting engine in particular is second to none. I was merely pointing out the lengths that you will go to to make FM7 look bad. It's really very sad. Some of us can can enjoy the fantastic graphics that all the main racing titles offer and don't have this almost fanatical mindset.
GTS time trial are not representative of the real trackside details of the game.... during race there are much more details.... "you will go to to make GTS look bad."
- 14,430
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
Oh, just like some trees aren't representative of the entire game, out like some modeling issues on one car aren't representative of the entire car list? Than why do you try to do that so much with Forza, yet realize that for GTS. You can add double standards to that list about you.GTS time trial are not representative of the real trackside details of the game.... during race there are much more details
- 6,838
- Europe
- GTP_Slim
- PzR Slim
I was making a like for like comparison. I didn't realise the rules of this thread stated that 'only pics that benefit GTS are allowed'...
You know what if it's that important to you, GTS is the best looking game ever made, it has no equal, other game devs might as well give up because they will never be able to achieve what PD have. Happy?
Last edited:
- 6,838
- Europe
- GTP_Slim
- PzR Slim
Play it on PC and Xbox but it's only fair to keep these comparisons as console only.
It's interesting to compare track texture detail. Where there is a clear winner.
FM7
GTS
PC2
PC2 looks incredible compared to the others. I love the way water collects in every little depression in the surface.
Last edited:
- 6,838
- Europe
- GTP_Slim
- PzR Slim
The Sony faithful have banged on about how PS4 is the superior console since this gen began. So it's been unfair all along to compare a PS4 to an Xbox One or a PS4 Pro to a Xbox One S. The Xbox One X redresses that balance. The shoe is on the other foot now and the Sony faithful don't like it one bit.So why do you immediately remade my FM7 oneS screenshot? only FM7 pics from oneX/pc maxed out that benefit FM7 are allowed?
However, that's no concern of mine I own a PS4 Pro, an Xbox One X and a very nice PC, I get the best of all worlds and don't have the pathetic, childish, extremely sad urge to pick sides
Last edited:
- 14,430
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
Yet here you are, constantly posting pictures on the Pro. How convenient for you. If one is going to be at its best(you using the pro for a benchmark) why shouldn't the other be at its best? Some more of those double standards I see.So why do you immediately remade my FM7 oneS screenshot? only FM7 pics from oneX/pc maxed out that benefit FM7 are allowed?
- 6,838
- Europe
- GTP_Slim
- PzR Slim
Urmm, your shots in GTS look just the same as mine, still very far behind PC2 but better than FM7. FM7 is clearly not the best looking game ever made, not something I have ever claimed, GTS is better looking with a superior lighting model, however, FM7 is nowhere near as bad as you make out.
- 14,430
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
If it's the same track in the same mode than what is causing the difference to happen?Another screenshot that "make GTS looks bad"... and is the second time in 2 posts.... "It's really very sad"
You know what if it's that important to you, FM7 is the best looking game ever made, it has no equal, other game devs might as well give up because they will never be able to achieve what T10 have. Happy? (cit.)
Reminds me of the difference you'd see in a scape, because even the original shots you put of the BMW doesn't even look like that.
- 6,898
- United Kingdom
@emula I sometimes wonder if people on here want you to magically improve the graphics of the other games. 
I was more impressed by some textures in GT6 given lack of memory that console has, the one below looks much better than the ones posted above. Looking forward to level of detail PS5 will bring in-game as PDI's assets seem to be top drawer.Play it on PC and Xbox but it's only fair to keep these comparisons as console only.
It's interesting to compare track texture detail. Where there is a clear winner.
FM7
GTS
PC2
PC2 looks incredible compared to the others. I love the way water collects in every little depression in the surface.
- 6,838
- Europe
- GTP_Slim
- PzR Slim
Goodness knows what happened in GTS then.
McLaren
Premium
- 45,362
- Texas
That's what I thought. I was gonna make a joke about how PC shots aren't allowed because it's unfair according to a previous member, but it appears the usual person took it literally.
Better than only shots from PC on its lowest resolution are allowed, coming from the GT faithful?So why do you immediately remade my FM7 oneS screenshot? only FM7 pics from oneX/pc maxed out that benefit FM7 are allowed?
Such a stupid clause to point out. Compare PS4 Pro to Xbox One X, which is exactly what Slim did. It's ironic how you joke about that one game gets to benefit from biased pictures whilst defending GT with your own biased pictures for it as well.
McLaren
Premium
- 45,362
- Texas
Oh my, how quickly your memory fades. Remember this post? This was you failing to share that these shots were taken in the game on its lowest setting on the PC version. The highest setting was similar to that of the One X.now here every xbox one S screnshot is a "PC on its lowest resolution" LOL
This was perfectly acceptable to bring up against Forza, but once someone brought in the Xbox One X, you deemed it unfair against the PS4. Someone even brought up the same argument of how GT's cars change in certain conditions, but you had an issue with that as unfair as well.
Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
forza change the player car in photomode (yes before pressing the shutter button)
during gameplay (or during photomode on AI cars) the cars looks like this
And the PS4 Pro is $400. Hardly a strong argument over the case of $100.
- 338
- United States
Scaff, you didn't show the real car carried out on the road, only the rev meter shown in the video. You are not using the same cars in game and GTS was done on a street not a track surface, something seems fishy.
If you want to test & critique things on how they relate to perfect reality; you should make accurate comparisons, not only because they are Front wheel drive cars. Also that is absolutely the worst camera shot and worst driving in GTS I've ever seen .
- 5,895
- Canada
Did you listen to Scaff's commentary?
- 338
- United States
what point are you getting at?
KingFrog
(Banned)
- 837
- NOYB
I just want to say , if you are going to take a picture of a texture, don't do it a sharp ANGLE. I took Both from the same track ( Mount panorama) on base PS4 hardware
Kyoto
GTS has better textures than Forza on some tracks, but worst on others. Streets of willow is using the old PS3 textures for the track, but they did update the trackside textures .
That being Said GTS and Forza both have bump map textures BUT Gts also has Parallax occlusion mapping, Forza.. NOPE .
From reading this thread, I can EASILY say both sides have done a piss poor job at representing a games graphics. From comparing tracks at different times of days. Comparing Photo mode to gameplay. Comparing a PC GAME TO A CONSOLE GAME. Comparing the PRo to the base Xbox. Seriously? Have you all forgotten how to OBJECTIVELY compare things? You don't compare textures at oblique angles, you can compare TEXTURE filtering, but not the textures themselves.
Kyoto
GTS has better textures than Forza on some tracks, but worst on others. Streets of willow is using the old PS3 textures for the track, but they did update the trackside textures .
That being Said GTS and Forza both have bump map textures BUT Gts also has Parallax occlusion mapping, Forza.. NOPE .
From reading this thread, I can EASILY say both sides have done a piss poor job at representing a games graphics. From comparing tracks at different times of days. Comparing Photo mode to gameplay. Comparing a PC GAME TO A CONSOLE GAME. Comparing the PRo to the base Xbox. Seriously? Have you all forgotten how to OBJECTIVELY compare things? You don't compare textures at oblique angles, you can compare TEXTURE filtering, but not the textures themselves.
Similar threads
