(Something off-topic, I would like to thank PD. I noticed when proof-reading my post that I learnt from the GT series, how to spell 'License' correctly
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c581/1c581cc0bbab739845ba94d95b303521a1e5e34b" alt="Sly :sly: :sly:"
)
Remaining briefly off-topic, license as a noun is an Americanism (nothing wrong with that, just hope that factors into your definition of "correct").
In actuality, the noun, as in driver's licence, is spelleded as such. Whilst the verb, to license a landlord for the sale of intoxicating liquors (
sic.), however is spelled differently - at least, that's what I done learneded in school
Another example is the R8 V10, marvelously detailed and perfect in every way, and I don't know yet who modelled that masterpiece.
I've discussed outsourcing with someone, some months ago and we've agreed that quality assurance is a very critical issue when it comes to outsourcing. However, the modeller of the CCX render, or the R8 V10 render, has already shown his/her talent, thus PD should consider hiring talented people around the world.
Also, there's a way to use the current renderings in the next games, just updating textures and lighting, so future titles will use the very same (although slightly updated) models to provide a smaller workload. Which in fact means, more cars and keep the old cars in the game. Analyzing the things in this way, you could presume 2000 cars in GT6.
As far as I recall, the CCX was modeled by somebody at a firm specialising in such things (released as publicity / advertising), so the level of talent is likely to be equal to if not superior to that at PD. Similarly, the R8 render is modeled from a conversion of the original CAD drawing - there's buckets of talent in there somewhere, but it's probably attributable to a great many individuals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88f4c/88f4c794f46fcc68c5344cc01a97eb0c0ad02bdf" alt="LOL :lol: :lol:"
Actually it was meant seriously, i'm generally more interested in both Saab and Volvo ( not all their models, granted ) than in a Koenigsegg.
If it was included i would buy one and try it, as i always buy every single car in GT, but it will probably be the last one on my wish list, sorry.
Actually, now that I think of it, me too - but I'd probably take a handful of any "mediocre" cars over a single oddity!
Hey, Hey, the'res a difference between a Japanese K-Soap box and a cute little car with personality. Fiat 500? Citroen 2CV? VW Beetle? Those are classic, and quite interesting cars. They're a laugh to drive! But driving a Suzuki Lapin...sorry, that's just drab and boring. I don't oppose to "slow" cars, I oppose to cars that aren't interesting. Benz Patentwagen? JA BITTE! Ford T? YES PLEASE! Citroen 2CV, OUI S'IL VOU PLAÎT! Honda Beat...erm...いいえ.
I like the Beat!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b6ab/8b6ab0b524cad723468a1a04426b21e3438aab3a" alt="Dopey :dopey: :dopey:"
I hated the prospect of having to race it in one of the prior GTs (maybe GT2 ?) but actually really enjoyed the almost kart-like handling! Had you ever thought that perhaps the same iconicity you talk about with the cinquecento
et al. also applies to certain miniature Japanese cars? Just because it doesn't appeal to you, doesn't mean it shouldn't make the cut - somebody out there somewhere must like 'em!
Forget making a poll about it, remember that these are heavily biased by way of weeding out all those that can't be arsed to think / vote / read / whatever... look at damage - apparently (according to Kaz) it was a fairly small portion of "fans" that wanted damage - what if the same is true of the CCX? Just because they're most vocal, does not mean they are in the majority.
Anyway, more seriously now. Since PD have this new, confusing way of measuring track count, what of the possibility that the same has extended to the cars?
What I mean is, what if at the new car dealer, you select your car and then are confronted with an options list of engine type / trim level etc. etc. ?
Obviously this may not be comprehensive (at least, it really needn't be) but it could cover both versions of the GTR, for instance - or gearbox options, or interior type / colour etc.
So the 1000 cars does not include variations of the same chassis (e.g. the numerous RWD skylines of old, or the Lancer Evo.s, the two GTRs) etc. but does include larger variations, e.g. between the 4WD and RWD Skylines or the B7 A4 / S4 and the B7 RS4.
PAO = Sexy.