Funny, I thought the power limiter was added so that you didn't have to have 5 or 6 of every single car in your garage tuned from 450-550 PP in order to be able to enter race quickly and to avoid having to search through a massive garage for which version of your car matches the race at hand. In other words, tune one car and it's good for a huge PP range. What is this tuning upset you're talking about?
The power limiter (PL) was never meant for GT5 that's why it was never offered or available when it was launched. The power limiter was a tool that was used to see how far apart the cars were in GT5 Prologue. This tool allowed them to see and understand the performance points system that they were working on, to refine the performance point system to a point that every car within it's class was even. Thus making it the responsibility of the player/driver/tuner to properly build (add power) and understand the cars and what they are capable of out side of the normal state. From what I gathered from two years of testing and talking with outside sources the goal was to see what could be done buy the user, to see what could be obtained, learned but that didn't happened. Which in turn had the PP system updated or changed four different times.
The forth time the system was changed only a few noticed how big of a change it was. It had brunt a lot more cars together within their class even more closer but no one could see or notice due to they were currently and still using the same method of "Adding a stage 3 motor or turbo to get the max amount of power to get the cars faster". When I noticed this major change I decided to share what I found out but to no eave only a few would try out what I found out. Once they did try it they were blown away on how well the cars performed and how much more balanced the cars were. No more fighting the car, no more coming up with crazy set to get the car around the track. The goal was to make the driver faster not the bloody car.
As of now only a small few have started building the cars properly, the way the system meant for them to be built. During the last six mouths of my testing I noticed a common number though out the PP system 2. Which I found very strange, which got me thinking and I thought to myself "Why the number two, why is this number?" Then it came to me code, math. That when I went on a storm to see how the numbers increased when adding items to the motors while their were still at 100%, this is when I noticed that the PP system had the cars in groups. Once I noticed this I was floored and upset that I didn't see it before though I was pleased to see it at the time. After that I slowly solid every car that had a stage motor or turbo, then I started step tuning the cars, which showed me another parts of the system. The system is built in stages, stages that allows the cars to stay even as long as the power limiting is not used.
I devolved a chart that shows these groups though I know some of the groups were off from two to six points. Along with how many points each part added pending on the group. I shared the chart though a few really paid attention to the chart and started using it. They found that the cars were more even using the group system rather than using a solid pp number, which allowed for more cars to be used within a group. Which in turn didn't allow any runner cars which was very pleasing to them.
I elaborated on PD's vision and the future of GT compared to what has changed. I dont care about Zuel's post on what "sucked" according to you or whoever. This is a GT6 thread though, so I'm talking things on what may happen then instead of focusing on the past things people might not like. Thats why I said his "vision" is seemingly confusing people that hes ignoring feedback and doing what he wants. But I believe its both. Theres the connection, if you didnt get that.
The only thing I want to see CHUM is that GT6 evolves, and the only way to evolve is to learn from the pass. If you can't understand that then you need to start rethinking what GT means to you. The only person that confuse someone is thy self. Your the one that is allowing yourself to be confused.
.
But I do now vaguely recall your "tuning theory" and I also vaguely recall I didn't think much of it.
