- 2,790
- Vancouver, BC
- liampage123
This is what happens when you push the limits of the PS3.
Placeholder framerate.
''Adaptive tesselation'' It's not like GT5's premium models are lacking polygons.
The PS4 would be a perfect platform to start fresh but it looks like they've screwed themselves once again.
You realise that the adaptive tessellation is designed to make the cars LESS detailed when zooming out, right? Not the other way around?
I completely agree, but not now:
A. PD has a tradition of releasing two games per console. They don't seem to be breaking this any time soon.
B. The PS3 still has life. No doubt it will still be sold alongside the PS4 for at least another year just like the Xbox 360.
C. There would be substantially less sales if GT6 was PS4 only. I've already seen many users on this forum who wouldn't like to go out and buy a new console for one game (personal preference). Though I personally would've loved GT6 to be next-gen, I don't have money to waste on another console plus the new required monthly PS+ to play online, so I'd much rather use what I have now, i.e the PS3.
D. You're judging a demo. DEMONSTRATION. Do you know what this means? It's not finished yet. I know this is a typical argument but it's very valid, and the 'Holiday 2013' release date is at least 6 months away. Things can change. Yet, you say "but it looks like they've screwed themselves", referring to PD. "Looks like". You don't know for sure.
I'm just saying. I'm not a 'fanboy' or whatever, in fact GT5 bores me now. I'm just calling it how I see it, don't try to flip the switch and say I'm biased like people have to others who voice themselves. I understand the demo has flaws, as does GT5.
Urgh. Why did they raise the display resolution? They freed up all those resources, and that is what they used some of them on?
A demo for a game that launches in 5 months has performance issues?
I am stunned.
Yes and like I said, the track tested wasn't the worst one in the demo. Silvy is worse. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the frame rate dropped to 20-25fps at points on Silverstone.
Nobody is saying that PD won't improve things for the full release. I'm holding out hope that they will so that at the very least I can have 60fps at 1080 for Time trials which is my favorite thing to do in the game. The issue some of us have is that we pointed out these problems when the demo first came out and a bunch of folks said "there's no frame rate problems for ME! You're just hating on PD!" and scoffed at the whole notion. Now the testing is out and shows that there definitely is a problem and its "oh but its only 60 down to 40fps ...no problem!"
I suspect this is going to be the go to argument for the "everything is fine, nothing to see here" crowd until release. Anything that's sub-par will be deemed "placeholder".
At this rate, GT6 will be an entirely placeholder game.
I suspect this is going to be the go to argument for the "everything is fine, nothing to see here" crowd until release. Anything that's sub-par will be deemed "placeholder".
At this rate, GT5 will be an entirely placeholder game.
Stunned as in amazed or stunned, as in,
D. You're judging a demo. DEMONSTRATION. Do you know what this means? It's not finished yet. I know this is a typical argument but it's very valid, and the 'Holiday 2013' release date is at least 6 months away. Things can change... don't know how (and going by PD's track record nothing probably will, unless it takes another 2 years like GT5P to GT5. Moving on). Yet, you say "but it looks like they've screwed themselves", referring to PD. "Looks like". You don't know for sure.
I feel you on that one
These have not been a problem for me.
Nice thread, this is GT Academy 2013 and not GT6 demo. No where does it state that at all, it simply states GT Academy 2013 powered by GT6.
A demo for a game that launches in 5 months has performance issues?
I am stunned.
TokoTurismoThis. It may sound typical to lots of people, but I'll pretty much say the same thing too if I was able to type up a wise "wall of text". Now that everyone has tested the demo, and discovering issues with the fps. This should notify PD that they need to fix this one way or another.
It isn't a choice, it's a must because this, right now, is a problem everyone is having, which should AT LEAST be solved "hopefully" through the coming months.
Agreed. Hopefully GT6 isn't powered by GT6 and we are good to go.
I don't know what you all waiting to see its on the PS3???
I'm not expecting any changes on the graphical part an thats how it goes its all about content just like GT3 and GT4 a boost on content,cars,tracks and a new interface nothing else will be majorly updated.
You guys are trying to compare next with current gen or with arcade games with 60 cars and 10 tracks,want something better than this wait for GT7 easy!!!!
PepeMickeyNobody expected better graphics, we just expected the newer game to run at least on par with its 3 year old predecessor but the fact that it performs worse is laughable.
Nobody expected better graphics, we just expected the newer game to run at least on par with its 3 year old predecessor but the fact that it performs worse is laughable.
jabofuThe GTA is just a placeholder before GT6. GT6 will have a new graphics engine, new physics engine, good sounds and 1500 cars. So, please dont judge this "thing" which is not a demo, not a presentation of the game that will come out in just 4-5 months. It is just a little piece of software created for hiding the true quality of GT.
Seriously, which game changed that drastically from the demo to full release? I cant think of one demo I played over the years. And if something have changed, then it was going in the negative direction. GT lost its sharp and clean look at this state. The horizon is blurring out and the jaggies are unacceptable. This is why I always voted for a PS4 release. PD tries to push over the limits, but the hardware wont participate.
If the current problems wont be solved for release, there will be one customer less.
dimangelogtpbut still even on 1080p the fps doesn't drop under 50. Source :http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-gt6-demo-vs-gt5
D. You're judging a demo. DEMONSTRATION. Do you know what this means? It's not finished yet. I know this is a typical argument but it's very valid, and the 'Holiday 2013' release date is at least 6 months away. Things can change... don't know how (and going by PD's track record nothing probably will, unless it takes another 2 years like GT5P to GT5. Moving on). Yet, you say "but it looks like they've screwed themselves", referring to PD. "Looks like". You don't know for sure.
Exactly!
No one is moaning about graphics, its framerates we're bothered about!
ImariDon't worry. It's all placeholder anyway. GT6 will be totally different.
Did you even watch it?
It drops to 40fps (3.20 in vid) and that doesn't include the worst offender which is Silverstone!
Well, I just leave this here: