- 8,239
- United Kingdom
CC570đź‘Ť
I approve of your avatar.
CC570đź‘Ť
UkHardcore23Just think how bad it will be with 15 other cars on track, Rain, Bumps, Tyre Smoke etc etc...god help us.
Seems Eurogame have cockpit view at 40fps at times so why does it look and feel like 15fps on my tv? It's just constant juddering.
Don't worry my friend, its just a placeholder;-)
The actual game looks, drives, performs, sounds totally different, this is just (all together now) "a placeholder" zzzzz:-D
Lol:-D
.....wall of text....
Funny how it doesn't even say in the demo that "it is a work in progress and is not representative of the final product" as well.
E. Cancel PS3 and move to PS4, wait for another 5 years...A. PD has drastically optimized the code or will be able to do so in the next 2 months..
B. PD has to postpone release date, getting more time to do the optimizations.
C. PD reverts back to the GT5 graphics engine.
D. PD releases it as is.
I give option A a low chance.
Option C gives "This is just a demo, it's not representative for the final product" a new meaning.
Did Kaz overreach once again?
JohnnypensoMy position is blah blah blah!
I'm sure people were freaking out just like they are here that the tire smoke was nowhere near realistic and there was no rubber left on the track and it was fixed of course for the full product. It's too early to draw conclusions about the full game. Anyone who does so is just overzealous in their contempt for the franchise.
EksIn all honesty, I'd prefer a solid 30fps than a heavily inconsistent 60.
And again, adding smoke and tyre tracks is far, far easier than getting the game running at 60fps constantly, improving sounds and AA!
Prologue, which had higher quality textures by the way, was also released like 2 years before GT5
EksAnd? Games like Dirt 3 and Grid 2 are very enjoyable for me and they both run at 30fps.
In all honesty, I'd prefer a solid 30fps than a heavily inconsistent 60.
Then you don't understand racing games and why they need to be 60fps!
Grid runs at 30!
At least thats one good thing about Forza, it runs at a rock solid 60fps
JohnnypensoForget sounds...that isn't part of the mix this time around. The rest, as I said, will have to wait and see. It's just silly to draw conclusions about a game that isn't released yet. Be concerned yes, but I'd rather spend the next 6 months optimistic, than crying in my beer over something that hasn't happened yet. If the game is released and I waste my $60 on it and it turns out worse than GT5 in many ways, it'll probably push me into another product costing PD all my DLC purchases. Impacting the pocketbook is the only way to get this stuff done.
I also think it'll ease some stress off of them considering they don't have to get everything optimized to get as close to 60 as possible.Agreed. I had this thought as well. I mean, it will be a wise decision to have 30fps than having to deal with getting a soild 60fps. It will annoy some people, but what can you do if your game's performance is struggling?
PD really needs to relax instead of killing themselves to try and get these kinda of stuff working properly. Don't worry about the next-gen racing games, just focus on getting the game perfect on current gen for now. đź‘Ť
You'd rather have a constantly jumping 40-60fps than a solid 30? Well in that case, you're right. I don't understand.Exactly! You don't understand!
TokoTurismoActually at some moments Forza's fps also drops too, I remember when I played it and saw a comparison between it and GT5's fps.
I also think it'll ease some stress off of them considering they don't have to get everything optimized to get as close to 60 as possible.
EksI also think it'll ease some stress off of them considering they don't have to get everything optimized to get as close to 60 as possible.
You'd rather have a constantly jumping 40-60fps than a solid 30? Well in that case, you're right. I don't understand.
I'm not going to be disappointed, i expect it to get only slightly better!
It you lot with your "its only a demo" & "its only a placeholder" who are going to be disappointed!
TokoTurismoExcatly, I agree with you very much. đź‘Ť
Really? 1 single frame when switching views! Lol http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-tech-analysis-forza-motorsport-4
The future of GT is doomed with people like you saying it is ok to drop to 30fps!
Nah, we're just accepting that it's better to do 30 than to try to achieve what can't be achieved. đź‘ŤThe future of GT is doomed with people like you saying it is ok to drop to 30fps!
EksNah, we're just accepting that it's better to do 30 than to try to achieve what can't be achieved. đź‘Ť
Nah, we're just accepting that it's better to do 30 than to try to achieve what can't be achieved. đź‘Ť
You need to read up on why it is far better to run at 60fps than 30fps.
So you'd rather have pretty graphics and run at 30fps than dropping resolution to 720p and 60fps?
Unbelievable!
SCERYou say unbelievable, but it seems that you're decidedly in the minority.
Sure.You need to read up on why it is far better to run at 60fps than 30fps.
So you'd rather have pretty graphics and run at 30fps than dropping resolution to 720p and 60fps?
Unbelievable!
PD just can't win.And the truth is, if PD made sacrifices in other things to get that solid 60 fps, people would just carp about those sacrifices the same way they carp about 60 fps
You say unbelievable, but it seems that you're decidedly in the minority.
30fps would definitely be worse.We have no evidence to suggest that PD, or Sony Computer Entertainment, would allow one of their flagship games to be worse than it's three year old predecessor in terms of aliasing or frame-rate.