CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,348
- United States
But but but... Proper hellaflush tends to hurt performance so isn't it more of a travesty on RWD cars which are generally agreed to be "better" than FWD cars?![]()
Depends on the driver.
But but but... Proper hellaflush tends to hurt performance so isn't it more of a travesty on RWD cars which are generally agreed to be "better" than FWD cars?![]()
Depends on the driver.![]()
Depends on physics. If it simply depended on the driver F1 probably wouldn't have evolved to be exclusively mid-engined, rear-wheel drive.
Depends on the driver.![]()
Depends on physics. If it simply depended on the driver F1 probably wouldn't have evolved to be exclusively mid-engined, rear-wheel drive.
Yes, but as I said, depends on your definition of better. F1's definition is faster, obviously. If you're definition of better is how it does in the snow, how easy it is to drive, etc. a fwd car can have its advantages. That being said, I personally thing MR is the best 👍 for fun, speed, and looksPlus who doesn't like having an engine less than a foot behind their head
![]()
Depends on your definition of "better." There are faster fwd cars than some rwders but IMO nothing matches RWD fun![]()
FWIW I also think the subaru looks pretty good on those wheels. A buddy of mine had the same wheels on his celica which looked pretty decent.
Depends on physics. If it simply depended on the driver F1 probably wouldn't have evolved to be exclusively mid-engined, rear-wheel drive.
It's the simple things that people come up with that I admire the most. Who says you need thousands of dollars to make a car look good?
Not arguing at all, but can you expand on this a bit? I'm interested.
So getting wheels other than stock wheels make the car not simple?
Every driver has a different style of racing, I like driving a fwd, but 75procent of this board hate it.. But in F1, it's prooven that mid-engined cars with real wheel drive are faster. As said, awd is heavy and loses mechanical grip and fwd can't put the power down like rwd does. Fwd cars pull while rwd push, it's also a weight issue. When a car moves forwards, the weight goes to the back so a fwd's front get's really light, too light, no grip. Rwd uses the weight to get the grip it needs..Depends on physics. If it simply depended on the driver F1 probably wouldn't have evolved to be exclusively mid-engined, rear-wheel drive.
Not arguing at all, but can you expand on this a bit? I'm interested.
That's not what I said. I'm talking about the little, individual simple things people come up with to make their car "theirs". Screw the fads, be a leader. The owner of that Subaru Wagon is a leader, because that's the first time I've seen TC wheels on a Subaru.
I understand your point but stock TC wheels aren't a good example of those "simple little things." This is coming from someone who isn't too much into trends. On the other hand, it doesn't mean I avoid something that looks good just because someone else has done it.
I understand your point but stock TC wheels aren't a good example of those "simple little things." This is coming from someone who isn't too much into trends. On the other hand, it doesn't mean I avoid something that looks good just because someone else has done it.
Every driver has a different style of racing
As said, awd is heavy and loses mechanical grip
And fwd can't put the power down like rwd does. Fwd cars pull while rwd push, it's also a weight issue. When a car moves forwards, the weight goes to the back so a fwd's front get's really light, too light, no grip. Rwd uses the weight to get the grip it needs..
I just come from a background of friends (and myself) that didn't make enough money to buy aftermarket parts and modified our cars with OEM parts from other generations of the same car, or cars from other makes. Thats the simple way.
Stock is stock, no matter how you look at it.
What's your problem with stock? Some stock wheels really, really do look good!!
There's no problem with that.
The only "problem" with "stock" wheels is that they're usually narrower than aftermarket fitment. Usually meaning not always.
I guess if you think stock things are impressive.
![]()
I stopped trying to wrap my head around the idea of spending a bunch of money on oem parts when I made friends with a bunch of VW guys.
Especially when said money could be used on an aftermarket part that worked better and looked better. I dunno how many times I've tried to understand how "plus, it's an oem part." was considered a "pro" against another part meant to increase performance(that did it better).
I've had more luck understanding the logic behind ricers(despite not agreeing with it).
It's like buying brand new wheels for much, much less.
Yes, you can get aftermarkets that perform much, much better. There will always be a racing wheel that performs better than any OEM fitment that is meant to last over 300,000 miles.
But the discussion of wheels, as I see it, is often a matter of aesthetics as much as performance... otherwise we'd all be riding on 9" wide 13" or 15" wheels.![]()
(Yes, I have one set of stock rims and one set of aftermarket rims for my car. The wider aftermarket rims are for track days.)