- 997
- Regina, SK
- Turboash
I would like to think that I wouldn't use it, but if I'm half a lap to completing a long race and F up for some reason... I might feel the urge.
Quote where I said the affect of rewind was a fact.
Right there, genius. You list both paragraphs as 2 reasons that make this feature "useless". You "support" your "reasons" by stating at the end it will make people disadvantaged online.If any of you guys were good sim racers, or real life racers, you might undrestand the importance of rhythm. Rewind will never teach the most important thing in racing that is rhythm.
You cant use it online.
Two reasons that render this feature useless. I dont care if its in or not. Those that use it will have no advantage, but they will be at a disadvantage when they choose to race live people.
Right there, genius. You list both paragraphs as 2 reasons that make this feature "useless". You "support" your "reasons" by stating at the end it will make people disadvantaged online.
You then went on stating that that was fact, that rewind won't teach rhythm, and that people will become disadvantaged due so. That was the sum of word.
McLaren, I don't think you are changing his mind. Perhaps it's time to just let it go?
You say rewind would prevent people from learning rhythm.
I didn't say you said prevent in that entire post.
Right there, genius. You list both paragraphs as 2 reasons that make this feature "useless". You "support" your "reasons" by stating at the end it will make people disadvantaged online.
You then went on stating that that was fact, that rewind won't teach rhythm, and that people will become disadvantaged due so. That was the sum of word.
Perhaps so. At this point, I'm not the only person who has showed him he hasn't posted 100% fact as he claims everything out of his fingers is.McLaren, I don't think you are changing his mind. Perhaps it's time to just let it go?
This is a decent attempt at trying to make yourself sound smarter, but you're not. You're changing your story now, and just repeating yourself. Classic first signs of someone running out of anything debate-worthy.More exemplification of the intellect, or lack there of, I am working with.
I said rhythm and the ability to recover were facts of being a good racer.
Perhaps so. At this point, I'm not the only person who has showed him he hasn't posted 100% fact as he claims everything out of his fingers is.
Ah well, back to some work.
This is a decent attempt at trying to make yourself sound smarter, but you're not. You're changing your story now, and just repeating yourself. Classic first signs of someone running out of anything debate-worthy.
Being able to recover quickly, and rhythm are both important. You saying they arent proves how ignorant you are to the art of racing.
Post 824 and post 833 are different posts
More exemplification of the intellect, or lack there of, I am working with.
I said rhythm and the ability to recover were facts of being a good racer.
IsmokeGTAnyways, rewind feature will not teach either of these 2 important aspects of racing. (More facts)
ExorcetA fact it certainly is not, there nothing that is more clearly an opinion. I don't see a response to my first post against this opinion, but I'll look again.
IsmokeGTIt is a fact.
We never said it didn't. What we did say is that you can't prove rewind is affects such things.How bad did you guys fail reading comprehension to not understand this?
There is no debate! you guys are saying I said stuff I didnt, but yet you cant quote where I said what you say I said. Find it already.
Can't speak for anyone else, but you'll notice I never said that.You saying they arent proves how ignorant you are to the art of racing.
So what do you think I meant by this?I wont know if you use rewind online
Both examples are true, not only to GT/sims but to real life also.
.
I said this
So what do you think I meant by this?
I admitted you cant tell if someone uses the rewind feature online.
Besides the point, we get you said you couldn't tell if someone does/doesn't rewind. The problem is, you claimed someone rewinding won't be as good as someone who doesn't in a given time. You don't know that.
"...I know you wont be as good as me with the same amount of play time..."
That is the problem. You don't know that.
That line negates you saying I am trying to prove anything, except that "the ability to recover and rhythm" are factual. Not to mention I have said what I said was factual over, and over.
Understand? You guys should remember what others say.
The quote in the above post proves my point also-"You saying they arent proves how ignorant you are to the art of racing." Do you think "they" is refering to the affect of rewind?
If any of you guys were good sim racers, or real life racers, you might undrestand the importance of rhythm. Rewind will never teach the most important thing in racing that is rhythm. *1
You cant use it online.
Two reasons that render this feature useless. I dont care if its in or not. Those that use it will have no advantage, but they will be at a disadvantage when they choose to race live people. *2
I GAVE PROOF.
Here is more proof- You mess up and cant recover quickly.
Plus you will never have rhythm? You will never do 20 fast laps.
Since you depend on rewind, you dont have rhythm to keep you going fast, and you dont know how to recover quickly. You will have no chance at being good. *3 This is the entire context, and it clearly implies that if you rely on rewind you will not learn how to recover quickly or establish rhythm, and that it will prevent you from becoming a good racer.
You took my words out of context...
I wont know if you use rewind online, but I know you wont be as good as me with the same amount of play time. *4
I gave two examples of why it is true. Both examples are true, not only to GT/sims but to real life also.
I will be arrogant now- I guarantee I am better than any one of you, or all of you combined.
You stop. Both are FACT!
Being able to recover quickly, and rhythm are both important. *5 You saying they arent proves how ignorant you are to the art of racing.
Yulp, you proved it.
I posted two facts to your none. (1 more fact in my favor, now 3 to 0)
Nothing was taken out of context.
AND I never said they will never be good, go read again. *6 which conflicts with *3 when you read *3 in context.
More facts in my favor. You guys are getting beat (just like on the track)
"You will have no chance at being good." was directed at Mclaren, not everyone that uses the feature. *7 your attempt to undo the fact that you contradicted yourself between *6 and *3 when clearly *3 is now being taken out of context by yourself.
3 : the quality of being actual
Yulp, rhythm and recovering quickly are just that.
AUP AUP, I never called anyone a malicious name, like you just did.
And you are wrong. That is the definition of the name you called me.
No, it is a fact. You obviously are not a good racer. Want me to prove it? TT or Race?
edit- 10 minutes and no takers. Thats all it took to shut you two up. Show and prove boys.
Ok, F2007 in a few. Ill send you a message. Good luck 👍
been on PS3 for 20min now... HURRY UP! way past my bedtime. Im down to 6hrs of sleep for tomorrow. 5.5 after the race.
Well, as much as you all disagree, being able to recover from mistakes and rhythm play an intrigal part of racing. *8 No one has disagreed with this statementAsk Suinit.
Almighty factual information reigns from my finger tips. Anyways, rewind feature will not teach either of these 2 important aspects of racing. (More facts)
@ aspect8- whatev
edit- I respect Suinit a lot more now, the rest of you are just wrong.(still)
C you guys later, it is sleepy time on the east coast.
It is a fact.
How can stopping, and rewinding, improve rhythm?
How can rewinding before your mistake improve your ability to recover from mistakes?
the definition of a Fact- 3 : the quality of being actual. Actually stopping will kill your rhythm. Actually never having to recover from mistakes will impede you ability to do so.
Two factual statement that prove a rewind feature will not make you into a good racer.
I did respond to your first response. I told you that you took my words out of context. Not only that, you only quoted half of my sentence. I will not respond any further than I did with such injustice served to my statement of factual information.
You are saying I said stuff that I NEVER said. Quote me...
I said it wont teach you rhythm, but that is far from preventing you from learning rhythm.*9 You are correct here, you never said it would prevent, however it is somewhat implied in *3
Here is a quick lesson- When your first statement is wrong, everything after that statement is wrong. Nobody is going to believe anything you say if the first thing is a lie.
edit- This is unbelievable!!!!
READ!!!! Come on, man. Point out where I say prevent!
"Rewind will never teach the most important thing in racing that is rhythm."
They can not use it!!!!!! Thats how they will learn
"disadvantage when they choose to race live people." Why would I say that??? Maybe because they will be dependent on the rewind feature and they wont be able to recover quickly??? hmmm, I may have meant that. again
Never said that. You are wrong, again.
I never said anything about rearranging quotes, nor miswording me. He said I said something I didnt say. Now, you did the same thing he did.
And what you are saying I said is a fact... I didnt!! You guys suck at this. I said rhythm and ability to recover quickly are needed to be good racers. That is a fact.
I said
and he quoted
"If any of you guys were good sim racers"
That is taking my words out of context.
Quote where I said the affect of rewind was a fact.
I said rhythm and ability to recover were facts of being a good racer. Nothing more.
These two quotes exemplify the type of intellect I am working with...
How bad did you guys fail reading comprehension to not understand this?
So what????? You said it! Then, you said you didnt
There is no debate! you guys are saying I said stuff I didnt, but yet you cant quote where I said what you say I said. Find it already.
I said this
So what do you think I meany by this?
I admitted you cant tell if someone uses the rewind feature online. That line negates you saying I am trying to prove anything, except that "the ability to recover and rhythm" are factual. Not to mention I have said what I said was factual over, and over.
Understand? You guys should remember what others say.
But you don't know that. I could easily put in as much time as you, use rewind, and win against you. Anyone could. But you think you know otherwise. You don't, so stop.*3 was directed at Mclaren, like I said. I say YOU
You have no proof of this. As I said already, someone could easily pick up this game, and be very good at it, while using rewind. Rewind doesn't mean you suddenly will take longer to get better. It just doesn't. But once more, you assume to know otherwise, but you're not giving hardcore evidence.And Ill say this AGAIN- a feature, even if used, will not prevent the ability to gain in driver ability. Like I said in one of the first post, it will take longer.
Your major flaw is I stated 2 things as fact. Im not typing them again.
"You saying they arent proves how ignorant you are to the art of racing." How does that line relate to me being better at racing online? You even admitted that it indicates the 2 points I state as fact.
*3 was directed at Mclaren, like I said. I say YOU
And Ill say this AGAIN- a feature, even if used, will not prevent the ability to gain in driver ability. Like I said in one of the first post, it will take longer.
*1 and *2 are facts *5 proves what I was saying, and how you all are wrong.
IsmokeGTOk, ill give up. I know what my point is. You obviously dont get it, that is ok. Rewind will kill your rhythm (you stop and go backwards) and you lose a chance to learn from your mistake (you dont get to experience what to do.) Not facts, but if you think they are remotely true then you have been argueing just for the sake of argueing. I never intended to say that was fact, but it simply is true. C ya
IsmokeGTI cant even get a response after all the nonsense? I asked 1 simple question. I dont deserve any acknowledgement at all?
RedSuinitIsmokeGTI cant even get a response after all the nonsense? I asked 1 simple question. I dont deserve any acknowledgement at all?
Hmm...
IsmokeGTOk, ill give up. I know what my point is. You obviously dont get it, that is ok. Rewind will kill your rhythm (you stop and go backwards) and you lose a chance to learn from your mistake (you dont get to experience what to do.) Not facts, but if you think they are remotely true then you have been argueing just for the sake of argueing. I never intended to say that was fact, but it simply is true. C ya
Sorry, I didn't see a question here. It sounded awfully definitive, and didn't seem to need a response.
If you are wanting to know if whether or not I was arguing just for the sake of arguing, no, I was not. You stated something as if it was a fact, when in fact it was not. You are even admitting that it was not, right here in this message. Yet, when we called you out on it in the thread, you never admitted that you had claimed they were 100% fact, when they were in fact, NOT 100% fact. I wanted you to see that you were incorrect in your thinking. That's all. I was not attacking you personally, or anything like that. If you felt attacked I apologize for it was never meant to come across that way.
RedSuinitIsmokeGTIsmokeGTOk, ill give up. I know what my point is. You obviously dont get it, that is ok. Rewind will kill your rhythm (you stop and go backwards) and you lose a chance to learn from your mistake (you dont get to experience what to do.) Not facts, but if you think they are remotely true then you have been argueing just for the sake of argueing. I never intended to say that was fact, but it simply is true. C ya
I asked a question, and I clarified the proble. You didnt get either point. Do you think what is in green is remotely true? No more pissing match, I just want some clarification from your side.
Sorry, but the way that it is written it's NOT a question, so I didn't understand you were asking me if whether or not I thought it was true. The way that it's written I thought you were just simply stating that I have been arguing just for the sake of arguing if I thought that it was remotely true.
Now, to answer your question, you are partially correct. I think that it could ruin your rhythm, but just stating that in all situations it WILL ruin your rhythm is not an appropriate statement, because there is no way to prove it.
I am not for rewind being in GT, but no offense, you are making some very broad generalizations that may or may NOT be true.
RedSuinitIsmokeGTThanks. You argued just to argue. Your time was not well spent on the forum. Proof or not, it will not help anyone to be a better driver. Common sense doesnt need proof. You, and the other guys, used no common sense. You are stuck in a box, and you should get out of it.
Yeah, ok dude, even though EVERYONE ELSE on the forums will say that I was the more logical of the two of us.
Ismoke, your argument is valid, but only because it doesnt take into consideration two major factors...IsmokeGT
"Rewind will kill your rhythm (you stop and go backwards) and you lose a chance to learn from your mistake (you dont get to experience what to do.)"
Truth be told- RedSuinit agreed with me, like any logical person would.
You guys are pathetic.
I write you in private and you post it publicly? What are you thinking?