Lots of Games have it Now. Should GT 5 have a Rewind Option?

[RedSuinit]

You argued just to argue- FACT

Rhythm and recovering from accidents are vital in motorsports- FACT

You agreed with my assumptions- FACT

Use logic to defend those facts.

You are a terrible driver- FACT
How can terrible drivers know how to be fast and what doesnt make you fast?

Nice.

You really told me man. 👍

 

[IsmokeGT]

The only fact here is that you're clearly not that bright.

Obviously you arent bright. You need proof? Look at the post I just quoted.

 

[McLaren]

Obviously you arent bright. You need proof? Look at the post I just quoted.

Yeah, don't even try to start this argument back up. You don't have any facts, you don't have any evidence, and if any of us start showing you were you're wrong, you go into a little tirade repeating yourself over & over that we're taking words out of context.

We have better things to do at this point, kiddo. 💡

 

[IsmokeGT]

Yeah, don't even try to start this argument back up. You don't have any facts, you don't have any evidence, and if any of us start showing you were you're wrong, you go into a little tirade repeating yourself over & over that we're taking words out of context.

We have better things to do at this point

I gave facts, you didnt understand them. My assumption was agreed upon by your slow little friend. Exorcet used 1/2 of a sentence of mine. You obviously have nothing better to do.

 

[McLaren]

I gave facts, you didnt understand them. My assumption was agreed upon by your slow little friend. Exorcet used 1/2 of a sentence of mine. You obviously have nothing better to do.

They're not facts. He's not slow. And that's ironic since you're the one who decided to try & PM us, and then complained that you weren't getting responses.

 

[RedSuinit]

They're not facts. He's not slow. And that's ironic since you're the one who decided to try & PM us, and then complained that you weren't getting responses.

👍 Now, I am done here, IsmokeGT will be getting no more responses from me, I have said my peace.

 

[IsmokeGT]

They're not facts. He's not slow. And that's ironic since you're the one who decided to try & PM us, and then complained that you weren't getting responses.

Rhythm and blah blah is a fact.
He is extremely slow.
I tried to be civil, not pathetic.
He AGREED with me. Refute that.

 

[Exorcet]

He said you were on to something, but didn't think it through all the way, hence no agreement.

 

[SUPER NUMBBER]

Maybe this topic should be let go too, its being beaten to death and the poll results clearly show the majority of people wouldn't want a rewind feature in GT5.

^This^

 

[McLaren]

Rhythm and blah blah is a fact.
He is extremely slow.
I tried to be civil, not pathetic.
He AGREED with me. Refute that.

Yeah, I'm going to go ahead & report this garbage since this is the second time you've insulted him.

 

[RedSuinit]

Rhythm and blah blah is a fact.
He is extremely slow.
I tried to be civil, not pathetic.
He AGREED with me. Refute that.

This is exactly what I have said. It's posted above, but just for those who don't want to read everything up there.

Notice the bold.

Now, to answer your question, you are partially correct. I think that it could ruin your rhythm, but just stating that in all situations it WILL ruin your rhythm is not an appropriate statement, because there is no way to prove it.

I am not for rewind being in GT, but no offense, you are making some very broad generalizations that may or may NOT be true.

Now as you can clearly see I somewhat agreed with you.

EDIT: I responded to him. WHY? How does he bait me so easily?

 

[IsmokeGT]

*waiting for refutation about how Redsuinit agreed with me*

 

[McLaren]

*waiting for refutation about how Redsuinit agreed with me*

Read his post.

 

[IsmokeGT]

Read his post.

I read he said I was correct

*still waiting FACTS to refute his agreement to my assumption*

 

[McLaren]

I read he said I was correct

*still waiting FACTS to refute his agreement to my assumption*

He said you were partially correct, but partially must be a foreign word to you.

BTW, I'm still waiting for that evidence for those "facts" you were spouting off before. Oh wait, there isn't any & never will be any.

 

[killanite]

I can't believe there are almost 900 posts (just in this thread) about a rewind feature! JEEZ have you people run out of more interesting things to talk about? you're just having constant flame wars in here about a feature highly unlikely to appear in GT5 in the first place!

 

[IsmokeGT]

He said you were partially correct, but partially must be a foreign word to you.

BTW, I'm still waiting for that evidence for those "facts" you were spouting off before. Oh wait, there isn't any & never will be any.

Partially correct is impossible.

You will never know the evidence because you are not a fast enough driver to understand what things like rhythm mean.

 

[McLaren]

Partially correct is impossible.

Nope.

You will never know the evidence because you are not a fast enough driver to understand what things like rhythm mean.

You're not a fast driver, either.

 

[IsmokeGT]

Nope.

You're not a fast driver, either.

Yes, and yes. Your little friend even said so himself.

 

[RedSuinit]

Nope.

You're not a fast driver, either.

He was pretty decent in GT. On fuji, with a stock Ferrari F430.

 

[IsmokeGT]

2nd in Tuned vette in the TT rankings means Im not fast? Ill list my other top ranking if I need to.

Also, "partially correct" does not make sense. Bottom line= he agreed.

 

[Organ-Donor]

2nd in Tuned vette in the TT rankings means Im not fast? Ill list my other top ranking if I need to.

Also, "partially correct" does not make sense. Bottom line= he agreed.

Nice 👍

 

[McLaren]

Yes, and yes. Your little friend even said so himself.

2nd in Tuned vette in the TT rankings means Im not fast? Ill list my other top ranking if I need to.

Also, "partially correct" does not make sense. Bottom line= he agreed.

Sarcasm isn't your strong suit, is it?

 

[IsmokeGT]

Nice 👍

Thanks 👍
I tried, and I am still trying, to not be cocky. My point of view is worth a lot. I know what it means to be fast, I know how to go fast.

Everything that I have said regarding racing is fact.

(I dont use a clutch either, if I did P1 would easily be mine 👍)

 

[RedSuinit]

2nd in Tuned vette in the TT rankings means Im not fast? Ill list my other top ranking if I need to.

Also, "partially correct" does not make sense. Bottom line= he agreed.

Ok, so when someone says that gravity exists, but that it exists because the earth is really an alien spaceship simulating gravity, he is partially correct. Gravity does exist, but not for that reason. However, if you want to say that "partially correct" doesn't make sense, then I will straight up tell you that you are wrong, for the very reason in my personal message.

 

[IsmokeGT]

Correct means to conform to a norm, or something along those lines.

When Isaac Newton Says gravity exist, you believe him because he is an expert.
Newton to gravity is Me to Racing

correct definition- 2 : conforming to or agreeing with fact, logic, or known truth...You can do this partially?

Im out for the weekend. Ill catch up with you boys later. Its been real.

 

[reaperman]

I don't see a problem with there being a 'beginner gt' with lighter physics, rewinding--hell I don't care if there are speed boosters on the track and blue turtle shells. Probably wouldn't hurt the series.

...as long as I never have to play the kiddie levels.
it's bad enough prologue made me play standard physics online and not turn off abs until I cleared most of the single player quest.

 

[niky]

While I do believe in rhythm, and I can't, for the life of me, complete an interrupted lap (sometimes, pausing the game absolutely kills my race), I don't believe that it would hold true in all cases.

You can't state it as a fact unless you have empirical evidence on your side besides the fact that you (1 person against Rewind) are faster than RedSuinit (1 person for Rewind).

Correct means to conform to a norm, or something along those lines.

When Isaac Newton Says gravity exist, you believe him because he is an expert.
Newton to gravity is Me to Racing

correct definition- 2 : conforming to or agreeing with fact, logic, or known truth...You can do this partially?

Im out for the weekend. Ill catch up with you boys later. Its been real.

You're not Newton. You haven't discovered gravity. You're a driver arguing against a different method of training.

It's like saying Gracie-style martial arts is better than all others just because Royce Gracie is a good martial artist. Unless it's validated over numerous matches between fighters of varying levels, there is no proof to support it.

You could be Gracie... and you could be right, even without proof. Or you could be Chuck Liddell... and you'll win regardless of style, simply because you're faster.

By the way... I'm against rewind. And I personally believe that learning the track as a whole instead of in discrete increments is the better way to learn. Just as in martial arts, where actual sparring is a better method of learning than simple exercises.

But that doesn't mean that repetitive exercises do nothing. If anything, they train you for accuracy and repeatability. As opposed to practicing full laps, which train you to link corners and approach them organically. Put the two methods together and you could have a driver who's both adaptable and natural and unerringly precise.

Of course, this is all hypothetical unless proven via experimentation.

 

[McLaren]

Like OMG, niky, you are like, so wrong. Don't you read?

Almighty factual information reigns from my finger tips.

Like, you're so totally wrong because you're not a good driver, and like, he is.

 

[RedSuinit]

Like OMG, niky, you are like, so wrong. Don't you read?

Like, you're so totally wrong because you're not a good driver, and like, he is.