LulzSec Attacks U.S. Senate Servers

  • Thread starter The Bman
  • 53 comments
  • 4,355 views
I'll certainly admit, if these guys have successfully done so, they are pretty good at what they're doing.


That, or their targets' security were easy to penetrate.
 
That same group - Lulzsec - also attacked Bethesda Softworks and reportedly Epic Games and Codemasters.

As if the cyber police needed any more ammunition in their fight against this group of hackers...
 
Why do they hack? I mean, I can understand fighting those who are against free internet and stuff, but video game developers? Playstation Network?
 
I thought Anonymous was about protecting free speech, and attacking people who tried to intrude on internet privacy. Now it seems like they're just attacking things "for the lulz", and really aren't fighting the good fight.
 
Can't they track where they're hacking from with IP addresses? Would it be possible to hack the hackers computers to stop future hacking?
 
Than people wonder why they try to censor the internet.:rolleyes:

I've never like anon since they attacked that 12 year old and his "no cussing club".
 
Why do they hack? I mean, I can understand fighting those who are against free internet and stuff, but video game developers? Playstation Network?

The squeaky wheel gets the grease.
 
If these guys can get into U.S Senate servers, then the break-in on the PSN that they did could just be an equally difficult job. Obviously, they could just pass it off as being unsecure and everybody who hasn't tapped in would believe that.
 
If these guys can get into U.S Senate servers, then the break-in on the PSN that they did could just be an equally difficult job. Obviously, they could just pass it off as being unsecure and everybody who hasn't tapped in would believe that.

Cracking the website for the Senate is hardly the same as getting into their primary servers.
 
These guys ARE NOT Anon. These guys are actually being bad, unlike anon, since Anon does attacks with reason. Lulzsec is just a bunch of assholes who attack online services for the..well.. obviously.. the "Lulz" of it. In my opinion, they need to be stopped, because they take many things too far.
 
Isn't Anon different from Lulz Security?

Very different.

I'd have to say that these are two organizations that are facing the world in very different ways. While Anon approaches things with their own sense of justice, they do little more that DoS attack to cripple networks, and show up every once in a while for a bit of protest now and then. LulzSec seems to be a bit more of loose canon, and quite literally doing it, "for the lulz." Anon certainly has an end to their means, I really do not think that LulzSec does. What I find unfortunate is that LulzSec is going to ruin it for everyone. Where Anon may have some wind behind their sails with a good number of their causes, the hacking community in general is going to be blasted to hell if LulzSec continues on this path.

That, or we see the great hacker war in which I presume all of the internets will be butter futtered to next Tuesday.
 
political-pictures-al-gore-internet.jpg
 
This is getting out of hand. I alone can think of 4 reports of hacking since last month. Is this a sign?
 
This is getting out of hand. I alone can think of 4 reports of hacking since last month. Is this a sign?

These LulzSec guys aren't doing anything really worth remembering. All they're getting at is the public websites - sites that are no more secure than most other websites. *YAWN*

I'll be more impressed when they crack into the NSA and steal that information.
 
Why do they hack? I mean, I can understand fighting those who are against free internet and stuff, but video game developers? Playstation Network?
Because they know there's a lucrative trade in gaming since people have to pay to play. However often they claim they are doing these things for laughs, groups like LulzSecurity aren't some benevolent organisation trying to highlight flaws in online secuirty systems. They're criminals.
 
There's a interesting segment on BBC Newsnight right now about the recent spats of hacking by lulzsec. Hearing Kirsty Wark saying 'for the lulz' was pricless! :lol:
 
I can't imagine that they're doing it "for the lulz" anymore. There was a report on Australian television the other night about an attack that LulzSec are taking credit for that involved getting into a host server and deleting over a decade's worth of information for hundreds of businesses in Victoria.
 
This is your LulzSec.

Arrested by the Metropolitan Police with the FBI in attendance, it's alleged that Ryan Cleary has participated in attacks on SOCA, the FBI, the CIA, Nintendo, Bethesda, Sega and Sony. For the lulz.

It's also alleged that he's a 19 year old who lives in a bungalow with his mum, has attempted suicide twice from age ten, has only left his room in the last 18 months to go to the toilet and shower (and be arrested), has his food and cigarettes left outside his door and has only one friend - a ginger cat. If true, I'm amazed anyone puts any stock in his ability to assess what "lulz" actually are...
 
Well this isn't very good for Essex's reputation.

Glad they got him though. Lulz.
 
Citation founded.

He certainly does seem to fit the absolute stereotype that all "ordinary" people have of people from the internets. A loner, shut-in geek incapable of real-world interactions. It rather sounds like the only lulz he's familiar with are those that have been directed at him.

But he's cool, because LulzSec always talk in pirate language!

It does rather make me wonder, though. If LulzSec are, as they are alleged to be, just six people and he's representative of them, where do they get off on deciding what's right for society and the people of the world when they separate themselves from it and fail abysmally at interacting with it?
 
Last edited:
Can't they track where they're hacking from with IP addresses? Would it be possible to hack the hackers computers to stop future hacking?



If they try hard enough I guess they can, but many of these hackers use multiple VPN/s Virtual Private Networks to attack anonymously, not to mention all of the other tricks they use for the same effect.

To some degree I like these hacker guys, how else do we as people get heard when our governments poo on us like they all do on a daily basis. I think Cyber crime/Hactavists have an important role to play to fight for peoples freedoms. I think though they have to be careful what they choose to fight for and how they do it. I was not happy about the PSN thing but understood why they did it.
 
Yes, I quite agree. Stealing a million people's personal details from a games company and posting them on the internet is absolutely a tactic designed to stick it to evil governments.


Wait, what?
 
To some degree I like these hacker guys, how else do we as people get heard when our governments poo on us like they all do on a daily basis. I think Cyber crime/Hactavists have an important role to play to fight for peoples freedoms. I think though they have to be careful what they choose to fight for and how they do it. I was not happy about the PSN thing but understood why they did it.
I don't. Given that they claim to be doing what they are doing 'for the lulz', I can't say I view their 'activism' as anything other than childish vandalism.

It does rather make me wonder, though. If LulzSec are, as they are alleged to be, just six people and he's representative of them, where do they get off on deciding what's right for society and the people of the world when they separate themselves from it and fail abysmally at interacting with it?
A very good question.
 
Back