I'm going back to some old discussions, but I recently did a lot of shopping related to this, so.
That would be excellent because im sure I could download PS3 demos from the computer way faster plus my PC is on much more of the time than the PS3...
Well, after actually doing this for the two PSP demos they had on there my thoughts are this:
If I could download directly to my PC and copy to my memory stick this would be faster. But not only do you have to use their software to download, but doesn't just download, it has to be attached by USB the entire time, and then the download is only about 60% of the process. After that it has to install. All of this must be done through the PSN software while connected by USB. So, on top of the download, everything runs at USB and memory card reading speeds of the PSP, which is slightly slower than HD. And because you have to be connected it isn't just a download and forget it, because I don't have a special space set aside for my PSP to sit safely.
PS one games don't run at 640x480, I think less than 20 ps1 games ever achieved that resolution. PS1 one games look ok to me, better than ever actually. Its just modern games tend to make classic 3D PS1 games look bad. PS3 displays PS1 games in progressive scan making them look better than what they looked like on PSone and PSTwo.
OK, after getting a TV adapter for my PS3 and running games both straight off the PSP and through Remote Play I can say my issue is my 48" projection screen SDTV that is probably closing in on ten years old. Everything looks better and less jaggies on my 32" CRT, which is similar to the TV I originally played these games on. They all look as I remember them.
Still I can deal with bigger jaggies for 48" beauty.
I have the component TV adapter and I'm not sure if it's just me or what, but I can't get the colors or the screen size to look right.
Screen size will only so the two modes based on the TV type you told it you had. For example, I have a 4:3 screen. So I had to tell the PSP it was a 4:3 screen so it would give me bars. So instead of having four modes (full and original for both 4:3 or 16:9) I only get the full or original for 4:3. On my DVD rip test file the widescreen mode would either be scrunched on the sides (full) or a smaller square in the center (original). But square videos were perfectly good in full mode.
If I changed my setting to say I had a 16:9 screen everything was squeezed.
So, I think because it is a native 16:9 screen I believe that it is best to have it on a 16:9 TV.
Of course, my next question is, aside from TVs that have no composite inputs (do they make those?) why make component plugs for a video that won't even be 480i?