It's an expression that pretty much says that you can cause more trouble than you intended with nothing but the best intentions. So, for example, in this case if Anonymous is attacking Sony to help the gamers, then it backfired because right now the gamers are the ones that are losing. They are hurting the exact group which they are claiming to be fighting for. Try to read between the lines a bit. I'm not bible thumping. My expression actually had nothing to do with religion, especially in this context.
You are clearly not appreciating the difference between breaking some obtuse "rule" of a contract you most likely had no idea you signed and that of "laws" based upon near universally agreed upon ethical behavior an individual living in a society. No small difference that.
I made no mention of "anon" and their antics in my post at all. I directly commented on the usefulness of being able to install full games to the HD. I then expanded on that reality by commenting "hackers," the implication here is of a technically skilled individual not employed by the manufacturer who makes changes/improvements to a device via their own means, do at times make things better. You quoted that comment with your confusing "best intentions" and "hell" garbly gook and now claim I misunderstood your critique because I failed to read between lines you never established. So yeah, fine, whatever.
I'm not in it for the lulz like many such people are.
Whether you know about a rule or not, it still exists and it is still enforceable. You can't go to court and plea ignorance on a traffic law (but officer, I didn't see the No Right on Red sign!) any more than you can breach a Terms of Service agreement. Whether the rules are fair or not is an entirely different debate.
Anyone have a link for anons website? if they have a site that is.
I just tried Google and all i keep getting is the definition of the word and such.
Thanks!
Ummm...... No I didn't? Read it again.
in the end they didn't even have the balls to let the courts decide on the legality of the applicable contractual user agreements. Kinda strikes me as odd.
It's 1 post, comprising 138 MS Word pages, 121 680 words most of which are profanities.....jesus.
It looks possible PSN will be back tomorrow, hopefully with new ToS where we get monitered 24/7 (Please Sony)!
Errm if you guys had a clue, you'd know that 24/7 isn't going to happen unless you plan on paying monthly subscriptions like LIVE. It's been known since PS3 release that servers would not be monitored continuosly because no money was put into it. The amount of unfounded rumours in here make me feel very smart.
Errm if you guys had a clue, you'd know that 24/7 isn't going to happen unless you plan on paying monthly subscriptions like LIVE. It's been known since PS3 release that servers would not be monitored continuosly because no money was put into it. The amount of unfounded rumours in here make me feel very smart.
errm if you guys had a clue, you'd know that 24/7 isn't going to happen unless you plan on paying monthly subscriptions like live. It's been known since ps3 release that servers would not be monitored continuosly because no money was put into it. The amount of unfounded rumours in here make me feel very smart.
Off topic, but exciting, none the less, is this little scene to entertain us through our waiting time: