- 10,403
- GTP_Spag69
- spagetti69
JediRageI wonder what happens to backwards compatibility then ...
You buy it again off PSN/SEN.
JediRageI wonder what happens to backwards compatibility then ...
You buy it again off PSN/SEN.
I would imagine your account would carry over. It may be as simple as going into the orbis network/my downloads and redownload whatever you have pre purchased. Granted i think that depends on if orbis uses cell.
If it doesnt use cell, then i believe nothing from the current psn would work.
It would be nice if games that were retooled to run on orbis structure was available to people who have purhased them originally through psn for free, but doubtful. Also if ps3 games came to the orbis network and you have save files tied to your account ( trophies ) then you get ti download the updated version. Doubtfull as many ( myself included)would be borrowing a ton of games from friends, picking up a couple trophies and eventually getting games free. It is to exploitable.
Ok end of post with nothing in it
But what about PS3 discs? Would they work in PS4/Orbis if the architecture is changed from CELL to something else?
Well the blu-ray format is no worry since they should re-use it. They could support hardware or software emulation of PS3 games(Perhaps even PS2 or PS1) as the PS3 has done it when there was fat models that could emulate the PS2 games without the PS2 CPU and GPU.
No there weren't. To play PS2 games the PS3 needed at least the latter.the PS3 has done it when there was fat models that could emulate the PS2 games without the PS2 CPU and GPU.
No they didn't and yes it did. All PS3 models that played PS2 disc games had at least the PS2 GPU in them, which was always a complete SOB to program for and emulate because of the way it handled VRAM.Heck they even did software emulation for the 80GB fat PS3 that didn't have the PS2 chips in it
Even if graphics quality was improved, besides smoother motion and less jagged edges you really wouldn't be able to see an improvement with the current resolution TV's. It would take a higher res TV to be able to see it, and I don't even think the human eye can process anything higher than 1080p.
...
but we'd be lucky if we got a similar set up to what Microsoft did with original XBox games on the 360.
I was always under the impression that the 360 did not support the original Xbox's games.
SlashfanEven if graphics quality was improved, besides smoother motion and less jagged edges you really wouldn't be able to see an improvement with the current resolution TV's. It would take a higher res TV to be able to see it, and I don't even think the human eye can process anything higher than 1080p.
Surely you can can't be serious.
Even if graphics quality was improved, besides smoother motion and less jagged edges you really wouldn't be able to see an improvement with the current resolution TV's. It would take a higher res TV to be able to see it, and I don't even think the human eye can process anything higher than 1080p.
Surely you can can't be serious.
Don't you know we see in 1080p. I used to but the lady at the DMV told me I now see in 1080i and will need contacts soon. Getting old is a 🤬
Those are just myths. The larger resolution just allows you to see more detail. I've never ever had a eye doctor tell me my eyes are 240P, 480i, or even 1080p in the past 17 years. That is just downright stupid. To be able to tell difference in the resolution of your vision is called Visual Acuity. She could of gotten it confused with that.
Your eyes are now capable of interlacing? That's impressive.
To be serious for a moment I think he was probably referring to the screen size and resolution ratio, below certain sizes he is right in saying a human eye couldn't perceive the difference between 1080p and anything more detailed. But certainly with a big enough physical screen size we can see detail about 1080p.