Polyphony Digital Inc. (PDI) and FIA to Form Long-term Partnership

  • Thread starter Dionisiy
  • 653 comments
  • 40,420 views
I still don't get why there are only 4 FIA certified tracks, Nuburgring GP,Silverstone,Spa, RedBull Ring, Monza, Suzuka are all F1 tracks, the likes of Brandshatch, Bathurst, and more are accurate aswell. Which 4 and why 4 exactly?

At some stage there was 3, at another stage there will be 5. It just so happens when this article was released (to coincide with the FIA conference) there were 4.
 
Stop focusing on this bringing new cars! It's MUCH bigger than that! This is FIA officials actually getting their hands dirty with online racing for the first time ever! This is breaking entirely new grounds.

This is (potentially) PD making new tools for the FIA in order to run championships to their standard and will be to the benefit of regular people who run online series as they'll (hopefully) have access to the same toolset. This is the FIA promoting Gran Turismo online racing through a huge world-wide media portal. This is Gran Turismo's eSport arrival. This is our current top drivers', only known to us (unless they became GT Academy champions), chances to become professional Gran Turismo 6 players and being flown around the world to compete in tournaments! This is going to stimulate GT's online competitive community like nothing else has ever stimulated anything like it before. This is a big deal and I could go on forever about it.

So now with that said and you guys being on the right train of thought, I'll leave the rest to your imagination.

you read my mind!
 
I love the fact that they want to bring old tracks to FIA standards.
I know most people like Trial Mountain etc. but I'd love to see a more realistic version of it, with proper safety standards. Same goes for Cape Ring, which is an amazing track, but that stupid jump needs to go for example.
 
I still don't get why there are only 4 FIA certified tracks, Nuburgring GP,Silverstone,Spa, RedBull Ring, Monza, Suzuka are all F1 tracks, the likes of Brandshatch, Bathurst, and more are accurate aswell. Which 4 and why 4 exactly?

PD just recently started laser scanning right? Bathurst, red bull ring, silver stone, spa, and brands hatch were all laser scanned. The others are older tracks and are most likely less accurate.
 
FIA is also promoting this on their own website, they have 230+ members in over 140 countries. They are a saftey regulatory board so they make sure that tracks are safe and up to code. That's a lot of members and so many racing leagues in there this a broad scope.

Surely this might be superficial right now, but they stated a long term partnership meaning that it can grow into something unprecedented just like GT Academy. One thing I hope to see is multi game license so we don't get the blotting out of driver names and venue from official cars that raced(All GT5 carry over race cars lost their designation Le Mans and year stickers as well as drivers real names). This can only mean that now with these guys scrutinizing your builds, PD will have to bring it with sounds and actual rules, and quite possibly the atmosphere from a full on race day.
Cautions for accidents, black flagging, white flags for final lap, pace cars for caution lap(s). Things can get better from that standpoint and as a whole increase GT's overall presentation as well as game play.
 
PD just recently started laser scanning right? Bathurst, red bull ring, silver stone, spa, and brands hatch were all laser scanned. The others are older tracks and are most likely less accurate.
Willow Springs is also laser scanned and I'm pretty sure Monza too (although, just as Spa, pre-2010).
 
Cautions for accidents, black flagging, white flags for final lap, pace cars for caution lap(s). Things can get better from that standpoint and as a whole increase GT's overall presentation as well as game play.

If the game tries to portray other series this could be true, but it's worth noting, in the virtual domain, things like cautions do not need to be operated... just ghost out the wayward car. Impose a speed limit automatically, rather than use a safety car. My point is they don't need to replicate these old techniques for controlling grids full of hotheaded drivers, just get the software to do it automatically.

They are creating a NEW series, not immitating an existing one....
 
I don't know why but I have mixed feelings with this announcement :lol: I'm looking (or hope) for better things to come in Gran Turismo in near months more than this.
 
Emerson Fittipaldi playing GT6 at the FIA conference

https://twitter.com/Jamesallenonf1/status/481476532096212992

Nelson Piquet at last year's Goodwood FOS:

14497603814_c9a99d0712_b.jpg



Anyhoo, this all sounds very exciting, I hope one of the tracks awaiting aproval is Cote d'Azur, so we can expect a nice updated Monte Carlo track soon!
 
I still don't get why there are only 4 FIA certified tracks, Nuburgring GP,Silverstone,Spa, RedBull Ring, Monza, Suzuka are all F1 tracks, the likes of Brandshatch, Bathurst, and more are accurate aswell. Which 4 and why 4 exactly?

In the article they say its a start and more may get licensed in the near future.

The track accuracy is impressive, however this may be a marketing gimmick of sorts, in response to how T10 touts it's outsourced physics and Horizon development.
 
^^ Yeah good question. I think the article mentions of a certification, as in approval: there you go PD, you've gotten the scale and layout of tracks quite right, ol' chap I say!

I know this is not the right thread for it, but if only they invest time, energy and resources to reproducing accurate engine sounds and race effects... boy o boy do the guys at T10 have a thing coming!
 
Maybe this is why I had that vision of COTA coming to GT6, however I will hold my breathe for now until we get more info.
 
I think this is part of the reason for some of the delays, they were making sure their up coming courses are FIA standard for inclusion in the online competition. Also probably why the camber issue was fixed in this last update. There could be a wave of changes coming in the new onslaught of updates to bring GT6 up to a higher level. If FIA is partnering with PD and Sony on this, PD can't simply afford to GT4-GT5 transition it(that was massively horrible). We have a Q&A section that PD actually reads and a GT Blog that gives information, a new update that fixed a glaring issue in the game an out of nowhere FIA back on the F1 schedule course added to the game.

All I see is PD is finally waking up and seeing that the competition is fierce and that they need to do what they did with GT and GT2 do something no one else was doing at the time and leave a mark in history. GT7 should be epic and the only way to make it so is to start right here in GT6. Source the information from the community to ensure that data on cars are as accurate as possible, know which parts of the game need to remain and which needs removing or retooling, what should be considered for inclusion...together we can built it bigger and better. Someone just has to meet us halfway and with FIA now in this partnership, we have a massive safety sanctioning board that will scrutinize PD's recreations so it's a win-win.

Now all that's left to do is to wait and see what come from this endeavor. I'm stoked at the possibilities it brings, an online competition hosted by FIA in GT6 is pretty big.
 
So how the bloody hell will this work??
I tell you how it works:

"Yo dawg I've heard you like badges so we put a FIA certified badge on some of your tracks,
so you can play online racing with our certified badges, while you keep speculating on unexistent FIA certified content and future FIA certified badges while we keep adding FIA certified badges on already existent content."
 
FIA partnership... hmmmm. Which racing series aren't under FIA regulations as of today? All I can think is NASCAR (open to multiple racing games after that EA exclusive deal went down the drain) and IndyCar (currently with CodeMasters and/or pCars, right?).
 
Back