- 215
- Michigan
- austin4500
I hate exclusive licenses with a passion. I just wish every racing game could enjoy all types of cars.
It's called humanity.+1
Greed is a sad thing.
BothIt's called capitalism.
I think
Both
Oh and let's not start with communism. Real communism doesn't exist.
It's a lie!But then we could have Porsches.
Woo communism.
You might consider that the game is just a little over a month from release... closer than it's ever been!
Once again, I know I'm the oddball here, but I'm really excited over the prospect of getting a Gran Turismo game in which I know almost nothing. We still don't know if we're getting used cars! That's how little hard info we have about game content. But I like it. This is going to make GT6 like a treasure box when I open it, unless they give in and dump a whole load of info in the weeks upcoming. If they do, which isn't unlikely, I'm probably just going to give GT Planet a peek now and then. Which, bonus for some of you who are tired of me gushing about GT6. Free unfettered complaining!
As of midnight, GT6 is exactly six weeks away from release. If Kaz and SONY don't dump it all in our laps beforehand, that's really not a long time to wait.
If EA hadn't selfishly grabbed Porsche then I think things might be quite different today.
And I say selfishly not just because they got Porsche just for themselves, but continue to do no justice to the brand by including only a handful of new Porsches to their games. At least Forza included the classics and the legendary Le Mans winners. You'd think Gran Turismo would do the same as well if they ever got a chance.
That is one beautiful car
- View attachment 80912 Senna's lotus 98t
+1
Greed is a sad thing.
"If you're a good person, you'll only have good things to say about this venture."If you head and your heart are in the right place you shouldn't have anything negative to say about this possible game changing collaboration.
Let's poll Sony and PD. "You have a choice Kaz of one eSZee who plops down $50 to buy your game or 1000 people who only have good things to say about your venture but don't buy the game. Ok choose.""If you're a good person, you'll only have good things to say about this venture."
Please. The arrogance.
I'll send them $50 and do more for them than 100 people buying the DLC.
I'm such a good person and I'm so much better than you all..../sarcasm
Funny some how I thought I was in the Senna content thread. I guess I was wrong this is the commi V capi/ its all about the money thread.
At the moment no one knows what it is but PD and the Senna family, and possibly there is still more to come if the partnership continues.You've got to admit though that PDI are cashing-in on a popular name. That's all this content is at the moment - a mere name.
At the moment no one knows what it is but PD and the Senna family, and possibly there is still more to come if the partnership continues.
So that means what? Kaz did say they wouldn't be treating the lead-up to GT6 like he/they did with GT5. But, everyone is makes these presumptions that offline mode will be the same, tuning won't be what "we" want it to be, the course maker isn't going to be as different and improved as some of us are expecting and so on.You would hope there is more to come, because no associated features have been announced.
I have the impression that Kaz may show some real info when either FM5 is released or when close to release. My thoughts.However PD has still a bit more than a month so many things could be revealed. We will have to wait and see!
Again, Kaz did say that he doesn't want GT6 to be treated like GT5 was in regards to the information/misinformation leading up to its release.
You know, he could address that by providing accurate and comprehensive information. That would be different to GT5.
Instead he's providing extremely broad and vague general statements only. Which is also different to GT5.
You can hardly blame people for making assumptions though. Generally when information is withheld about a product, it's for a reason. And usually not a good one, because if you have information about the product that would generate more sales then you'd get it out there.
Maybe it'll all turn out for the best. But from the state of the last product and the reluctance to give any solid information on the current one, I think there's very good reasons to be dubious until shown reasons to be otherwise.
No games company should ever release "accurate" information. Every time they ever do, they get crucified for it when they have to pull content at the last minute. And there is always content that doesn't make it. Better to keep quiet and give vague statements - sure the community ends up guessing or making assumptions, but at least they are not assumptions based on developer statements.
The people that get disappointed, who obsess over every detail of the game before launch tend to be disappointed no matter what you tell them anyway. Better to leave them to unfounded assumptions than give them ammunition if the game is missing something that was "promised".
Luckily for us Kaz was greedy enough to want to make $10's of Millions for himself by developing the GT franchise. Thank God for greed!!!![]()
Let's poll Sony and PD. "You have a choice Kaz of one eSZee who plops down $50 to buy your game or 1000 people who only have good things to say about your venture but don't buy the game. Ok choose."
With enough GT buyers, Kaz can buy people to surround him all day and whisper sweet nothings in his ear, butter his toast and pre-chew his food. And buy a few more cars..![]()
No games company should ever release "accurate" information. Every time they ever do, they get crucified for it when they have to pull content at the last minute. And there is always content that doesn't make it. Better to keep quiet and give vague statements - sure the community ends up guessing or making assumptions, but at least they are not assumptions based on developer statements.
The people that get disappointed, who obsess over every detail of the game before launch tend to be disappointed no matter what you tell them anyway. Better to leave them to unfounded assumptions than give them ammunition if the game is missing something that was "promised".
Ya sure, it'd be nice if you actually meant that in a positive way.
Geez, have you any idea how many unfair business practices happen around the world everyday where somebody makes massive money at the expense of others?... I'll tell you 9/10 times North America has been the greediest place in the world in which so much 'unfair/fake' money has been 'made' through other countries (China would be one small example) in the last couple decades.. but you can check out Americas 'Debt Clock' if you got some spare time and figure out for yourself what it means... most people around the world work a lot harder for less money. The average Brazilian for instance can't even think about owning a Playstation.. fair? no... yes there a trillion factors when talking about world economy...obviously don't want to go there, just saying it's unfair for you to preach about greed because of a $60 game.
It's like you're catagorizing PD as some kind of government monopoloy.. I think they deserve every sale they get... sure they've been semi-lucky that the name Gran Turismo has sold itself so well and that it happend to be the only real racing game on Playstation, but now over the last few years we have a couple other games that can be considered direct competition, so it's up to PD to keep progessively working at it.. and I don't see anything that doesn't show they're doing exactly that!... (hopefully real sounds are currently being worked on)
And by all means, Kaz can add another couple nice cars to his garage when/if GT6 has sold well, I've got no personal problem with that.
If they have to pull content at the last minute, then it's not accurate information is it?
I'm not sure you understood the context of my post. I was responding to the suggestion that I shouldn't complain and should be grateful that Kaz created GT5. I don't believe gratefulness is part of the equation. I paid my money, I got my product, I liked it, I'm happy. I don't need to slobber all over Kaz's feet to enjoy the game or refrain from talking about the parts of it I don't like. Blind loyalty isn't part of my make up.
GT was a "vision" for Kaz to be sure, but what made that vision come true was money flowing into the coffers. I don't begrudge him a single cent he makes, it's well earned.
If they have to pull content at the last minute, then it's not accurate information is it?
So that means what? Kaz did say they wouldn't be treating the lead-up to GT6 like he/they did with GT5.
But, everyone is makes these presumptions that offline mode will be the same, tuning won't be what "we" want it to be, the course maker isn't going to be as different and improved as some of us are expecting and so on.
Having said that, why aren't expectations being withheld until we're given more information whether it's after the game launches or just right before?
Again, Kaz did say that he doesn't want GT6 to be treated like GT5 was in regards to the information/misinformation leading up to its release.