- 251
- United Kingdom
- yido
You may have a pointHaven't read the full article but all those bullet points seem positive to me. Maybe you're a glass half empty person
You may have a pointHaven't read the full article but all those bullet points seem positive to me. Maybe you're a glass half empty person
I don't know, i used PayPal.Last question (sorry) but is it safe to use the Credit card directly since Pay Pal doesn't want me to ship to an address that isn't my billing address?
I think he doesn't like it. Look at the comments he made below:So, what do you guys make of this EmptyBox tweet?
I think he doesn't like it. Look at the comments he made below:
Matt @EmptyBox_007 9h9 hours ago
@SynteZZZ Ehh, Career mode is incredibly basic, tracks are poor, graphics aren't that special outside certain ToD, AI is easy...
So, what do you guys make of this EmptyBox tweet?
Wow, being a bit on the negative side lately.
Career mode is incredibly basic, tracks are poor, graphics aren't that special
His views are subjective anyway. Personal opinion rather than truth.
Sorry, but isn't emptybox the guy that thinks iracing still has the best physics ever, despite many people saying (and backing up) that it's actually outdated now and bettered by AC and such?
Yeah, I'm not gonna listen to him.
Matt Orr's opinion is not that important. As is the Hardcore PC sim racing crowd in general. They are not many in the grand perspective (~85k, going by iRacing Member Numbers, AC is somwhere around 300k, but huge difference between owners and active players for them) and love to separate themselves from anything 'Mainstream'. Even if not a single one of them is buying PCars, nothing will happen, except them missing out a great, realistic racing game.
But his ideas could influence casual buyers.
All of empty boxes negative points are valid
and which one would that be?Just had my first PCARS ad on YouTube. Yay!
In his last PCars video (about 3 months ago) he said it wasn't a competitor for rFactor or iRacing but would be a competitor for RRRE (Well in the description at least).Are they? He said the physics were simcade-y
In his last PCars video (about 3 months ago) he said it wasn't a competitor for rFactor or iRacing but would be a competitor for RRRE (Well in the description at least).
Sorry, but isn't emptybox the guy that thinks iracing still has the best physics ever, despite many people saying (and backing up) that it's actually outdated now and bettered by AC and such?
Yeah, I'm not gonna listen to him.
Are they? He said the physics were simcade-y
Then why on earth does he say "this isn't on iracing/ rfactor's level"?He has said many MANY times that this is NOT his view...
Are they? He said the physics were simcade-y
Then why on earth does he say "this isn't on iracing/ rfactor's level"?
And why is it fanboy-ish to dismiss stuff that is clearly not the case?
I like Matt, I think he's very funny and can be informative when he wants to be, I'm a subscriber to his channel, but it is laughable to criticize Project Cars for the things that the games he loves don't have either. Graphics, career mode etc.Says the one who plays iRacing, Game Stock Car and rFactor. All of them have no career mode at all, awfully modded/modeled tracks (besides iRacing) and DX7/DX9 graphics.
Some will listen but most people will seek out other reviews and they won't be quite so negative. Matt has been pretty clear in the past that he thinks there are a lot of positive with the game but he doesn't think it's a hardcore sim, mainly because the grip fall off is not quite as abrupt as it is in the games he likes. iRacing for example. His last review of the game showed him battling with the AI and losing, so I'm not sure how you could say they were too easy. The graphics complaints as I said above, are also laughable given his game preferences as well.True, but a lot of people will take his opinion as fact.
Wouldn't be surprised if his main gripe with pCARS is because it is making an attempt to bring more realistic sim physics and experiences to a wider audience. He is a great youtuber and all but seems to suffer from elitism from remarks he has made in the past.I like Matt, I think he's very funny and can be informative when he wants to be, I'm a subscriber to his channel, but it is laughable to criticize Project Cars for the things that the games he loves don't have either. Graphics, career mode etc.
Some will listen but most people will seek out other reviews and they won't be quite so negative. Matt has been pretty clear in the past that he thinks there are a lot of positive with the game but he doesn't think it's a hardcore sim, mainly because the grip fall off is not quite as abrupt as it is in the games he likes. iRacing for example. His last review of the game showed him battling with the AI and losing, so I'm not sure how you could say they were too easy. The graphics complaints as I said above, are also laughable given his game preferences as well.