Yep, I've seen it way too many times. In fact, I can't even play GT4. I've bought two different copies of the game, two different PS2, and now the PS3 and still can't play GT4 past 20% because of the red loading error.
But mine never turned red, it just appeared to be taking a really long time loading.Yep, I've seen it way too many times. In fact, I can't even play GT4. I've bought two different copies of the game, two different PS2, and now the PS3 and still can't play GT4 past 20% because of the red loading error.
But mine never turned red, it just appeared to be taking a really long time loading.
I'm probably too impatient to wait for it to turn red.My bad, I thought you said it did. Mine wouldn't be red immediately, but after some time of trying to load, it would eventually turn red. I wonder, given enough time, if it would have turned red.
Hope it doesn't become a habit for your game...
Last night I was playing GT4 on my PS3 and I went to enter the All American Race Series and it went into the loading screen and just sat there with the red and blue bars and spinning circle/clock thing. It never gave a disc read error or turned red, but it sat for nearly a full five minutes before I hit the PS button and quit the game. It loaded back up just fine and everything has worked since. Fortunately, I had just saved and didn't lose anything.
I was just curious if this is common, if anyone else has had it happen, or if it may have just been a one time fluke. Is there anything I did or didn't do that could have caused it so I can avoid that?
NBA Live 08 is made by EA, that's what I meant by NBA 08. I don't even care about Sony's version.
Linky.After weeks of speculation Sony has officially unveiled the lower-spec 40GB PlayStation 3 and has announced that it's heading to the UK on October 10 at the cut-down cost of 299 GBP. What's more, Sony is also slashing the cost of the 60GB PS3 down to 349 GBP.
The lower capacity hard drive aside, the entry level 40GB PS3 only has two USB ports (compared to the usual four), the multi-memory card port has been removed and the machine will not be backwards compatible with PlayStation 2 titles, because Sony reckons there has been "reduced emphasis placed on this feature amongst later purchasers of PS3".
But, I have. And I still think it is a dumb move. At least until Sony stops selling the PS2.Those who snipe at Sony for not having BC never played a 640x422 PS2 game on their 1080p screen.
How so? One could have been waiting out on their PS3 purchase until the PS2 stops getting games. So what do they do when they go to buy it and it turns out they can't play any of the games they had just recently bought?If BC really is important, you would have bought the console already.
All "market research" says is that PS2 sales are still way to high to even think about dumping BC on the replacement console. The only reason that Europeans have been yearning for a lower priced PS3 for so long is because they never got the 20gb model in the first place. They want a model, any model, that is cheaper. And Sony is perfectly willing to give them just that while stripping the machine to bare-bones (more or less), since the Europeans never got the 20GB model and thus never learned how much of a shaft this one actually is.I would give props to Sony for listening to market research.
I think BC is still going to be important for a lot of people, but then again, unless I'm mistaken, Sony isn't removing BC from all their PS3 models, and we don't even know for sure if the 40GB may end up with BC support after all, although I can see why they might not add it as a way of offering a budget model.I got my 60gb PS3 back in December and have been quite pleased with the BC, with the shortage of games I was able to replay GTA: San Andreas, GT4, Shadow of the Colossus, SOCOM 3, and MLB 2004, all of which worked flawlessly. If you are going to get a PS3 soon, I dont think you would need the BC as much because there are so many choices for new, and hopefully good games.
I think you are underestimating the amount of people who do care (or what at least looks to be the amount of people who care). If the fiasco over the software vs. hardware BC was any indication, I'm guessing removing it entirely will lead to Sony's European HQ being burned to the ground.So you are quite right, and fI suspect for most people it won't seriously diminish the value they get from having a PS3 without BC support.
That's OK, I also think you are overestimating the amount of people who do care, and especially when based on how little to no evidence there is that this so-called fiasco over hardware VS software BC impacted sales… just a lot of internet speculation and personal opinion.I think you are underestimating the amount of people who do care (or what at least looks to be the amount of people who care). If the fiasco over the software vs. hardware BC was any indication, I'm guessing removing it entirely will lead to Sony's European HQ being burned to the ground.
You quoted the smiley (and the part where I essentially said that it was overblown) but didn't get that it was a joke?I also think you are making a lot of assumptions, including the assumption that there won’t be PS3's with BC support for those that do care that much about BC support.
Since having my PS3 I've played one PS2 game on it, GT4, and that went off after a single race.
If your that bothered about backwards compatiblity, keep your PS2. That said, I'm more for the idea of getting more for your money than less, but people who have a large collection of PS2 games are surely going to have a PS2.
I don't get it though. If the European PS3's BC is done through software how come not having it will reduce the hardware price?