Good question, but as this guy is the project manager for the 360, he may not be in on whatever is coming out next. If Microsoft works like many corporations they may hand him a prototype and say, "work with this."
I suppose employees come and go and as you said what this guy is saying now may not even be true a few months down the line.. A good example was Phil Harrison and rumble... it happened and he had to eat his words and now hes gone!
MS may very well have some sort or mega strategy for this and there LIVE branding seems to be where they are heading i.e. a non physical distributor of everything!
I have a training meeting with my staff later today to deal with this exact situation. It should be fun looking at 32 people and saying, "Starting Monday you will now use this for everything. You have two days to learn it."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88f4c/88f4c794f46fcc68c5344cc01a97eb0c0ad02bdf" alt="LOL :lol: :lol:"
Hope you dont go too hard on them!
I am just assuming this might be what is happening as higher ups in Microsoft had discussed Blu-Ray. So, either it will be on their next system or talks broke down. It is possible that Microsoft may be pushing digital delivery in their next go and are trying to force the issue by not supporting Blu-Ray in any way, but if they do that they may be looking at large losses in hopes of huge gains down the road.
Yeah, loose the battle but not the war mentality, big gamble but having said that Sony to a huge gamble with Blu Ray and it payed off..
I've said numerous times that downloaded games are the future, hell Sony has shown that with games like Warhawk and GT5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7708b/7708bb82fb76dc6f268def20d44cf4efdb76e9e3" alt="Tongue :P :P"
. Boxed games are a waste since you don't need packaging and you really don't need the disc, why not cut down on materials used?
As I said there are many people who do like physical things, they want an extravagant games and DVD collection, they want to see the box, the box art the disc etc... it feels like they have actually bought something.. I never really buy stuff I can't hold, if its on PSN and disc I will buy the disc version...
This would save everyone money.
Not necessarily, If anything I see it being a monopoly! You wouldn't be able to shop around if it was only on offer from XBL... this brings me to the major flaws with downloadable content available from one place...
1. What are all the media stores going to do? HMV, Virgin, GAME etc... a huge percentage of their profits are from games, they now wont be able to sell anything.. are they are all going to go bust? And don't forget online retailers.
2. No competition so your going to pay the horrible full RRP on the XBL site and there is nothing you can do about it...
3. The second hand market, your not going to be able to buy games for cheap off ebay or off your friends... even the brand new games market, games are half the price abroad due to VAT and other taxes... so now they are all going to be a standard price?
4. System failure, you already loose your XBL arcade games, now your going to be loosing everything if xbox reliability is anything to go by!
Now you could say that donwloadble content it already the way things are going with music films even software etc but there is one difference... THERE ARE MANY COMPANIES OFFERING THESE SERVICES which means its better because there is competition.
The next gaming systems will have several TB's of space on the hard drive, hard drive space is very easy to get now. By the end of the year we will have 20-50TB hard drives for PC's.
That may well be true but in my eyes discs (if looked after) are far more reliable than any HDD's especially large ones...
Microsoft rejected the offer because they don't need it. The only thing they need to do is give the 360 a bigger hard drive and it's fine until the next system comes out. You can download whatever you want on to it. If you don't have an internet connection then you are falling behind on the technology, you can't expect the industry to wait for you. Either get with the programme or be left behind.
Saying that 'oh technology has moved on.... deal with it' is not the way to get sales in a console war... Both 360 and PS3 have tried as hard as possible to accommodate people who may not be up to todays technologies in the hope to secure more sales (BC is a good example of this).
For example, I still only have an SD box TV... I would be mighty pissed off if the PS3 was HDTV only and therefore I probably wouldn't buy it and buy another system or buy it when I can afford a new TV... either way its a loss in sale right now.
Not everyone has broadband (even in the UK there are lots of rural areas which cant get it other than through satellite which is madness!). And even those who have BB most don't have super fast speeds.... most have somewhere between 2 and 10MB which is not fast enough to download 25GB! A song yes, a film, yes... but not a huge game..
And if Sony thinks the lifespan of the PS3 is 10 years they are nuts, 1080 will be out dated in a couple years. Not to mention increased graphics capability. If they were smart they would put the fourth generation out sometime in 2010 or with the launch of the next resolution spec TV.
The PS2 has lasted nearly 10 years..... it came out in 1999 and its still going now (ok it has seen some changes) but it still runs on the same core parts...
I see the PS3 being totally able to last 10 years if not more... as for 2010 there is no way that we would see the PS4 that early in my eyes..
Robin