Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,839 comments
  • 2,839,821 views
There are in fact several things that are certain in life. One of them is inexplicably poor taste:

cp4685514566229016017.jpg

cp5509904175954925264.jpg

cp5112695286731067471.jpg

cp5168864503387501011.jpg


cp5714150471559023717.jpg

cp5578833659401904276.jpg

cp4785372488315971495.jpg

cp5749930650371847128.jpg
 
Last edited:
That Taurus got exactly what it deserved...

I wouldn't say the car itself 'deserved' it. I like to think of molested cars as the unfortunate victims of crimes committed by their owners (who are oft aided and abetted by reckless body shops, paint booths and wheel suppliers around the country).
 
What the hell.

A mid-70s Datsun? What the hecking heck was that? O_o

My guess is that it's a Mitsubishi "Lancer" Celeste (A70-series) AKA Colt Celeste AKA Chrysler Lancer Hatchback AKA Dodge Lancer Celeste AKA Plymouth/Dodge Arrow

800px-Mitsubishi_Celeste.JPG
 
RocZX
My guess is that it's a Mitsubishi "Lancer" Celeste (A70-series) AKA Colt Celeste AKA Chrysler Lancer Hatchback AKA Dodge Lancer Celeste AKA Plymouth/Dodge Arrow

Why do you know this :lol:
 
I don't understand the point of these marshmallow-esque cars.
Who does?:crazy:

I saw one similar once with Stars & Stripes livery, but I'm surprised nobody has torched that one for what it has on display.
'Stang Sympathy :( :(:
The first one, wrong paint job and wrong wheels! :crazy:

The chickenstang? Does it have to be a mustang for this? :irked:

Third? Okey I am a long time SpongeBob fan, but I honestly do not like this! :yuck:

Last one would look pretty good if the ride height and wheels were normal. ;)
This one nearly had me crying. v v v:
Oh. My. Goodness!!!!!!!!!!:scared: That has got to be the worst one I ever seen in my entire life! :ill: It don't get no worse than that...... :crazy:
Next... For use on the road? Questionable, as it looks like it may still have an engine. However as a BBQ/spa/garden lounger... I'd consider it. :dopey:
Questionable, but I like it!:dopey:

NO NO NO!!! Mustangs are off limits for those kinds of mods!
Precisely! :crazy:

After getting some good laughs and bad heartaches alike, I have to be serious when I say that its a shame that the custom car world will likely always be plagued by such hideous and downright stupid customization ideas. :yuck: Bugatti Veyron lookalike built on a car that isn't near the caliber of a Veyron. Whoever owns that car wasted about $20,00 of what could help afford an actual Veyron. 👎
Like this?
315061.jpg

That Taurus got exactly what it deserved...
I can't see the video. :( Can you post the link please?
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure if that "Veyron" is upset because of his harsh words, or because it simply exists.
It's upset because it knows I don't like it, I am Bugatti fan. (In case my avatar doesn't tell you. :lol:)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some more that I know ya'll will hate. :crazy: :sly:

A really stupid one! :crazy: This is not how to treat a vintage car! :yuck:
278994.jpg


Not sure what this car is (or was) but it just isn't right! :crazy:
uglycar.jpg


Probably photoshopped but still hideous! :yuck:
ugly_car_Post_unusal_cars-s361x221-24957-580.jpg


Somebody call the vehicle exterminator! :lol:
ugly-bug-car.jpg


What car was used for this? :confused: Doesn't look entirely like a Lancer. :crazy:
galleryimage-1315542848-sep-15-2011-600x400.jpg


I think one spoiler is enough! :crazy:
ngbbs40eb174380545.jpg


Probably the mother of all horrid vanes! :crazy: (Batman is still cool though)
tumblr_lbxv5v92R81qzozj1.jpg


What was this car to start with?
289428.jpg


More images than I normally post, I know. :ouch:
 
That yellow... thing... most resembles a 2000-02 s-class. Same taillights (they switched them in 2003). Not a c-class unless they REALLY extended the trunk. Definitely not e-class
 
Why two spoilers? Because RUF! THAT'S WHY!

RWB Porsches also have two spoilers.
I am honestly not too surprised to see that RUF with two spoilers because GT5 has it were you can do that. :crazy: Still not right though. :crazy:

EDIT: Front view of van.
tumblr_lbxvbcoDyA1qzozj1.jpg
 
Last edited:
That is the ugliest and THE MOST questionable 'box' I have ever seen in this thread. :crazy:
Definitely the most questionable. :crazy:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Too many fattening snacks and the wrong color for it! :crazy:
pink+fat+art+car.jpg


What was the owner thinking? :yuck:
car369NC1.jpg


Not on a PT Cruiser! :crazy:
2001ptcruisercustom0405.jpg


As if the AMC Pacer isn't questionable enough! :crazy:
cars-5.jpg
 
Last edited:
The PT looks hilarious. :D

Another fat one....convertible...
and apparently Porsche based.

prog_fat_porsche.jpg


Not as fat but still ugly...

N5uT8pcK.jpg


Nasty Camaro...

bodykit-500-lamborghini-gallardo-camaro-5-e1288153284119wtmk.jpg


Honda Civic Coupe!!!

original.jpg


...and more time & money than sense. :rolleyes:

miata-porsche-boxster-body-kit.jpg
 
Back