ZAGGIN
fcuk religion, fcuk god, and fcuk the fools who blindly follow. put plain and simple, relgion is a tool that was created by the strong minded to control the weak willed. at its best, its just a get out clause for those scrared of dying.
the bible may be a wonderfully descriptive piece of literature, but it isnt fact. its contradictory and (in places) defeatist. how can the bible be the word of god, if there are so many different versions? if you grab hold of any bible today, and compare it to the orginal king james version, you will find glaring inaccuracies and contradictions. is the word of the lord that hard to understand that it comes out differently every time someone trys to interprit it?
heres another though. if there is a god in heaven, then why do children have to die?
I had sworn off of this thread way back. But you sir are absurd.
First you dis God, religion, and the Bible.
You obviously haven't read it if you don't know why kids have to die. It sucks, but the Bible that you eschew states plainly (In the King James that you seem wed to) "It is appointed unto man once to die, and then the Judgement." And in heaven, where God hangs out, children don't die.
You make it sound like all the bad things that happen are on God.
Satan is out there and very real also.
His job is to "seek those whom he may devour".
Read the book of Job sometime and come to some understanding that sometimes God allows bad things to happen. It may be a test of faith for the believers.
The word does not contradict itself. It has warned us to beware of false teachers, and here you are claiming the Bible isn't factual. Seems factual to me. (Yes, I'm insinuating that you are among those the Bible tells us to beware of)
Each version of the Bible (Good News for Modern man, King James, New King James, New Internation, American Standard) are essentially the same. Read them side by side and you will find essentially the same
meaning.
"Good News for Modern man" has been translated into language and syntax that "street people" can understand.
The others are basically clearer versions of the KJV. Updated, as we no longer, unless you happen to be Mennonite or Amish, speak as common language.
Where do you get off calling the Bible defeatist?
Sampson slew many men, alone with the jawbone of a donkey. He knocked down an entire temple bare-handed, after being beaten, jailed and blinded.
David killed lions and bears with a slingshot. Oh yeah, there was also somethng about a giant.
Joshua destroyed an entire city and all who lived within by marching around it and blowing horns.
300 men of God went into battle against thousands and prevailed.
Jesus bodily removed undesirables from the temple.
Then there's the Great battle of Armegeddon, in which the armies of the Anti-Christ are going to be defeated by the armies of God.
Jesus rose from the grave, and was victorious over death. He resurrected Lazarus from the dead.
Where is the defeat in any of that?
For the record. I'm not trying to browbeat anyone into believing the Bible. Or in God or anything.
I believe. Not because my daddy did. Not because my Grand-daddy did. I believe because I've read/studied the Word. I believe because I've seen the power of God bring people thru, (myself included) some bad situations.
I believe that it's sad, that
Zaggin doesn't believe because he can't translate the meaning of the King James version (written in a form of english that is no longer spoken).
That is a pretty lame excuse for discarding/discounting the Bible.