- 7,855
- Mother's House
- MattyMc1996
- Egg's box? £3.60.
gt5 fanI'm in the UK! ACTA you aren't stoping me!
All world countries are free to sign until 2013.
gt5 fanI'm in the UK! ACTA you aren't stoping me!
mattymc96All world countries are free to sign until 2013.
XennEven though a lot of countries have been signing this in the EU, it has not been enforced into law as the votes have not been taken place yet.
There's still time to contact your EP to convince them to vote against it.
All world countries are free to sign until 2013.
YSSMANFree to sign, and then create legislation to enforce the laws as they interpret them. Don't get me wrong, ACTA is very much worth fighting against, but in most places where nations have signed-on to this... Which is otherwise a trade agreement... There is still quite some time to shape the legislation that will eventually affect them.
It also has yet to be passed in all countries that signed it so it very well may not happen in most. 👍
I hope we in Australia get to vote for it, but I doubt it.
Yep wont happen, we didn't even get to vote in the current prime minister.
If you're going to say "SOPA is back, the sky is falling" perhaps it would be more usesful to have current references in your links, and not stuff at least a year old. And the first one has nothing to do with SOPA anyway. The ransomware virus was not put out there by the government!
SOPA will not pass.
The US goverment is having its hands full with this PRISM thing.
Wow, after reading through quite a lot of this thread, I am left astonished at how feebly people have argued against SOPA. Piracy, it seems, is deeply entrenched in most people's way of life. The ugly side of piracy is all too familiar to me, and it has devastating results.
Shame on you.
Care to share and inform people instead of standing on your SOPA Box
Seriously though care to explain how it devastated your life. Also did you read anything about how the RIAA are pulling the strings on these type of proposals along with other big groups and leaked documents show that SOPA/PIPA wouldn't have worked from the RIAA's own people...
Wow, after reading through quite a lot of this thread, I am left astonished at how feebly people have argued against SOPA. Piracy, it seems, is deeply entrenched in most people's way of life. The ugly side of piracy is all too familiar to me, and it has devastating results.
Shame on you.
"All too familiar" - I don't know how many times I have had the experience of: "Ah look, yet another pirate mob selling on ebay the album that I recorded, for a quarter of the normal price. Nice to know that someone is making some money out my blood, sweat, and tears". Also, as soon as an upload of a full album put on Youtube is removed, another takes it's place.
"Devastating results" - I will not use mine, but the most horrific official figures I know of. An artist that I knew ended up selling around 2% of what they had, pre modern piracy. That is based on official figures from the accountant, and juxtaposed with a dramatic increase in popularity. Imagining devastating results should not be difficult.
People like DK throw around their "All these measures do is screw over the average Internet user", but the human toll on the other side of that kind of selfish dismissiveness is something few would want to answer for. Presented with the real life fallout, only the most utterly cold hearted individual would not question their own actions, and certainly their attitude.
If people truly believe that SOPA is the wrong path to the right result, argue at least equally for the right path. Frankly though, I've not seen a lot of that in this thread.
Hence my carefully worded: "pre modern piracy". Net difference is what matters, is it not? 2%, seriously, two percent.Um this type of sharing has gone on for years, you aren't anything new and to sit their as if mix tapes and record making to share with people just started in 99 or 00 is silly.
A little thing called fear, mostly. I wouldn't dare deride piracy in a non-anonymous arena. Some survive on merchandise, but see below*.Also why do artist seem fine with piracy or music sharing?
How many do you deal with? I know (and know of) many that are. Maybe the big ones find a way, but the small/medium ones are on borrowed time. Many surviving by further strangling their artists. Advances are all but a thing of the past for many record labels.Why aren't record companies in shambles?
More like empathy seeking rhetoric, but I honestly don't know why I am even trying. People generally filter out what is uncomfortable. I'm not aware that any large scale facts/stats are available, but the truth is no doubt in the numbers that appear on so many artists' statements. It's your choice whether or not to have empathy.Also why are you using what seems to be empathy charged rhetoric to combat others that aren't? I mean if you want some impact show some facts.
I don't think the situation will be remedied, and I don't know how it could be done. Is something only unfair if there is a solution?The issue here is while I understand your charge at the same time your crying foul without giving any ability to remedy the situation yourself.
Hence my carefully worded: "pre modern piracy". Net difference is what matters, is it not? 2%, seriously, two percent.
Surely you can equate this to opportunistic illegal activity? A click of a button is about as easy as it gets.
A little thing called fear, mostly. I wouldn't dare deride piracy in a non-anonymous arena. Some survive on merchandise, but see below*.
How many do you deal with? I know (and know of) many that are. Maybe the big ones find a way, but the small/medium ones are on borrowed time. Many surviving by further strangling their artists. Advances are all but a thing of the past for many record labels.
*Contracts are tending to stitch in exclusive rights to selling an artist's merchandise.
More like empathy seeking rhetoric, but I honestly don't know why I am even trying. People generally filter out what is uncomfortable. I'm not aware that any large scale facts/stats are available, but the truth is no doubt in the numbers that appear on so many artists' statements. It's your choice whether or not to have empathy.
I don't think the situation will be remedied, and I don't know how it could be done. Is something only unfair if there is a solution?