- 2,218
- Manchester
- toyotsupra
- Jame3sBoy
I'd say Perez or Kobayashi have a better chance. š
Perez definately dont forget he is in the ferrari driver academy programme
I'd say Perez or Kobayashi have a better chance. š
Perez definately dont forget he is in the ferrari driver academy programme
Are you referring to the sponsor agreement? I think Williams would rather get some podium finishes than have money in the bank. Williams is a name in F1 which does not fit in the bottom tier.Williams will take Barrichello or Raikkonen, but not both at the same time. Maldonado is simply too valuable to them.
Are you referring to the sponsor agreement? I think Williams would rather get some podium finishes than have money in the bank. Williams is a name in F1 which does not fit in the bottom tier.
They're not going to get podium finishes without money to develop the car.I think Williams would rather get some podium finishes than have money in the bank.
But they can certainly do better than five points in a single year. Their back-row lock-out in Abu Dhabi was the low point of their lowest season to date (though, admittedly, that had more to do with Cosworth than any degree of incompetence in the team). The deal with QNB to get Raikkonen into the car is said to be worth $30 million. And the arrangement with PDVSA to keep Maldonado in the car is believed to be worth $15 million. Replacing Maldonado with Raikkonen will automatically cut out one-third of their revenue stream.You could throw all the money in the world at williams, they would still not win any races.
prisonermonkeysThey've had a technical overhaul for 2012.
That's not how it works at all. You don't just stick the car in a windtunnel, turn the wind tunnel on, leave it running for a few hours and when you come back, you have a better car. It's not a cake. The windtunnel only provides feedback on what it working and what is not. It's up to the team to use that feedback to make the car design better.
Williams have also been hurt this year by the use of off-throttle blown diffusers. Hispania first raised objections to it at the Spanish Grand Prix. It quickly became evident that Cosworth simply couldn't make their engine maps work. One of the reasons why Valterri Bottas is doing quite well in the young driver tests is that a lot of the teams are experimenting with "periscope" exhaust outlets to see how they will affect car balance and performance next season. Because of that, they're not blowing their diffusers (even if they have a higher engine map, the exhaust gas isn't being used), and so lose downforce.
Your use of inverted commas is noted.
Well, Eric Boullier considers the matter to be over:I really don't understand why they're hyping it up as an "amazing outburst" anyway. It wasn't like he was just talking trash about the team. He was explaining the order of events that led to where they ended up. Criticizing the team is one thing, but speaking about things that didn't go the way you had planned is another. I don't think he should have owed the team an apology, but I guess that's just the result of the politics he's involved in.
I don't think the media had anything to do with it. Petrov had alredy apologised to the team before the first English-language story broke. Though I would not be too surprised if Petrov agrees to stand down for Brazil as a form of apology.
I think he'll stay. Especially if the team promote Grosjean to a full-time race seat; they'll need someone experienced and familiar with the team to lead them. They also need the money he brings, though Genii need to work on developing connections within Russia.
The only problem with that is that the car isn't capable of finishing on the podium. It's barely capable of scoring points.A form of apology would be to go and finish on the podium.....