- 643
- USA
- Carfreak44
I was talking about cars like the Renault Clio V6 which is also named Lutecia. It's the same car different name. Plus I don't need a '99 S2000 from Europe, the US, and Japan when I just need one '99 S2000.
The five cars that you DO NOT want in GT6.
- Thread starter D3ATHS1NBUNCH3S
- 1,669 comments
- 122,219 views
- Status
I was talking about cars like the Renault Clio V6 which is also named Lutecia. It's the same car different name. Plus I don't need a '99 S2000 from Europe, the US, and Japan when I just need one '99 S2000.
CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,319
- United States
One LH drive model and one RH drive model would be nice though.
ITCC_Andrew
(Banned)
- 18,532
- Kitchener
Not the V8, which I'm interested in.
- 2,028
- Poland
- Ultimetal
Well, many others, apparently
Wasn't my point to offend anyone, sorry about that one.
'Deal with it' - that's what I say in such case. I always want to see a McLaren F1 in a potential racing game; I fell in love with this beast when I was 4, and I'm hunting it for 10 years now (no success, sadly). When there's no F1 in a game, I just go on with a bit worse experience of the game and that's it; there are many other awesome cars in the game.
Infuriating? Just because I'm wrong? No reason to get mad, really.
(Agreed about the first part)
This is what I meant by removing cars (although I mentioned Daihatsus etc.). I don't want to see the rides completely gone; just narrow down the numbers of cars appearing a lot of times under different names like quoted here. Like putting two separate models of R34 for Midnight Purple II and III, or the Honda/Acura HSC Concept in the game.
I got your point, dylansan, now that I think of it a tad more.
"One man's trash is another's treasure", as they say.
ITCC_Andrew
(Banned)
- 18,532
- Kitchener
Guys, this thread will lead to nothing but arguments.
I don't understand what purpose it serves, to remove beautiful cars.
I don't understand what purpose it serves, to remove beautiful cars.
- 40,879
Amazing. I don't think I've ever heard of someone posting in a thread 115 times without understanding it.
- 2,143
- The Track
- youngun_great
Maybe removing dups isnt the option but filing could be. Have all s2000 type v years under one name but you can buy a 00' through the options. You could buy a R34 through UCD (a proper used car dealer not a random lost) but picking Nur spec 01'. So there isnt an obligation to get all cars to find best but just get each model by selecting personal option.
- 381
- Setúbal
- Crackez
- ChasedAxis
What I see here is that nobody knows the concept of the GT series, why remove the tank car? No other game has it, it´s a diferent car and I would like to it in premium, and please PD bring back the auto union v16 in premium model. yes, there are to many miatas, of course and the red bull x2010 is also a stupid car. PD please just look at GT5 car list and see that dlc's are stupid for a game that have so many good models in standard, please put then into premium like the chrysler prowler, my favorite standard car, weird car with interior view it's just awesome.
- 3,697
- London, ON
- A_Mindful_Place
Wow some just don't get the point about having all the versions of a car in the game.
40+ GTRS
- 6,985
- United States
A_Higher_Place40+ GTRS
What i am saying is if they do what they did with the GTRs and put say other cars with all models and specs. But just because they did it with the GTRs and a few other Japanese cars it's a issue. I say how is it a issue? Answer this if your favorite car or personal car was in GT5 and had every model and all specs of it wouldn't you want to keep it?
I mean really? It does seem like you are mad that there is all of those different models of Japanese cars well how about make a poll and ask to do what they did with the GTRs and do it with every car they put in.
For instance I love lancer evolutions. There are a load of them in the game. I love it. But there are a few versions i like to have in. And before you say "why what's the purpose to have all of those cars in" because with the EVOs some work better in different places than others as in track combinations.
- 40,879
Which isn't the same situation as with the various Skylines.
- 6,985
- United States
Toronado
How is that not relevant?
I see you edited oh ok. It's cool
The skylines do the same point some work better at different tracks. And i am talking about not tuning the cars just simply getting in a driving them around the track.
- 40,879
Because you are claiming that PD put the same amount of care into the Skyline models as they did for the Lancer Evos, and indeed that there are enough differences in the first place in real life for them to be comparable. There isn't. The differences between a 1995 R33 GT-R and a 1996 R33 GT-R are so minute that they are likely nonexistent even in real life, let alone if PD bothered to implement them in the game (which, again, their track record for doing so in GT5 is pretty horrible). It isn't like the differences between a Lancer Evo II and a Lancer Evo III.
Last edited:
- 6,985
- United States
Toronado
So not trying to be rude but. If i was so irrelevant why did you even bother editing your post to take it back?
But anyway. It is relevant i am sorry but we are talking about GT6 not GT5 so saying "well the stock tuning is wrong in GT5 so your point isn't valid" doesn't work. Yes in GT5 the stock setups are not correct by far. For instance the EVOs stock AYC is not set like that in real life. Technically PD wanted to do that with GT5 but didn't. I am saying in GT6 if they do this duplication again they need to put the right stock setups on the cars.
- 40,879
I said it was irrelevant because noting the differences between Lancer Evo models was irrelevant to the conversation about the differences (or lack thereof) between Skylines. I took it out because it was phrased in a more confrontational way then I intended, but the point still stands. Find me something that states the differences between a 1995, 1996 and 1997 Skyline GT-R; or a 1995, 1996 and 1997 Skyline GT-R V-Spec. Find me something that tells me that, yes, there is something unique about each one; and no, they aren't just the exact same car with the the model year changed even in real life.
Because if you can do that than your mention of the Lancer Evo models being different would then be relevant. But if you can't, it would not. The Evo models have clear and obvious differences from year to year and between trim levels. The Skylines, other than the R32 models, generally do not.
I'm talking about GT6 as well. This is the GT6 forum after all.
I see nothing to suggest that anything to do with GT5's development was the result of the duplicates when most of them are pushing at least 8 years old now since PD did anything with them in terms of specs. That is plenty of time to at least make them accurate in terms of specifications, and it wasn't done. What seems far more likely to me is that either PD just didn't care at modeling those differences like they did back in the GT1/GT2 days, at which point I see no reason to assume that they will suddenly start caring if they pad the roster of GT6 as well; or that in real life there are no differences between them either so them being the same in the game (or, worse, fabricated differences to justify their inclusion) will never not be pointless because they aren't different cars. Your first response said this:
Prove that. You are saying that people take issue with the cars because they are Japanese, and they wouldn't care if the year duplicates were American or European or whatever.
But it seems to me from what I've seen in this thread that people are complaining about the European duplicates (Lutecia Renault/RenaultSport), and people are complaining about the American duplicates (Ford GT) right alongside the Japanese ones. It seems to me that people who take issue with it are against PD inflating their car count in a misleading way on principle regardless of which cars they are doing it with.
- 6,985
- United States
Toronado
I hear you. But the reason i posted the example of the EVOs is simply another example. And don't worry I didn't take affence to it. I was just asking why you thought it was irrelevant.
But what i meant was that each models (r32/r33/r34/r35) of the skylines have many different specs (as in spec nur/spec m) and in theory IF they do put the correct setups in each model and specs that i would have no problem supporting having multiple different versions of every car.
Last edited by a moderator:
- 146
- ProjectVRD
I just want more focus on European and American cars. Even the Marussian cars etc. There is far too much bias towards certain Japanese companies and it gets a bit depressing seeing the DLC always featuring a new GTR.
I wish Kaz would listen to his biggest market. I would rather the current Vauxhall/Opel line up in Premium than another few GTR's.
I wish Kaz would listen to his biggest market. I would rather the current Vauxhall/Opel line up in Premium than another few GTR's.
- 11,297
- Sweden
- eran0004
So, five cars I don't want in GT6... I see a lot of X1's and Tank Cars, and seriously I don't get it. I mean, if we can only say five cars we REALLY don't want in GT6, this would be my list:
Edit: Actually, forget what I just said. All of those would be the ultimate trolling cars. Imagine going full throttle down Döttinger Höhe in your Lamborghini Miurcillardodor (?) and suddently being overtaken by a high-heeled shoe
Edit: Actually, forget what I just said. All of those would be the ultimate trolling cars. Imagine going full throttle down Döttinger Höhe in your Lamborghini Miurcillardodor (?) and suddently being overtaken by a high-heeled shoe
- 39
- West Coast
- RacerX22745
Many variations of Skyline, S2000, etc. Maybe cut in half, and add cars from GT1 and GT2 if possible.
GT5_Honda_Guy
Premium
- 352
- sNaKe_aSsAsSiN
Just turbo the other one??? Why not? Don't really need all the dupes, which even Kaz said in an interview that he would change that if he could go back...
- Status
Similar threads
