mister dog
(Banned)
- 8,396
- Spain
- misterdog
- misterdog7
New Vision GT's leaked?:
Nah Hot Wheels
New Vision GT's leaked?:
Nah Hot Wheels
Maybe they'll just pick their most emblematic design and make a race version out of itIf Hot Wheels ever does end up in GT, I wonder what their VGT would look like...
If Hot Wheels ever does end up in GT, I wonder what their VGT would look like...
They have their work cut out if they want to top the Bertone Vision GT thoughMaybe they'll just pick their most emblematic design and make a race version out of it
The Darth Vader car would be cool... Disney would want $1Billion in licensing though...rough estimateThey have their work cut out if they want to top the Bertone Vision GT though
+ Has to be powered by lasers right. Big red ones so it can compete with that Chaparral one....Darth Vader Vision GT!The Darth Vader car would be cool... Disney would want $1Billion in licensing though...rough estimate
Powered by light sabre of course+ Has to be powered by lasers right. Big red ones so it can compete with that Chaparral one....Darth Vader Vision GT!
Theoretically possiblePowered by light sabre of course
Powered by light sabre of course
New Vision GT's leaked?:
Nah Hot Wheels
Enough with the bickering. The noise has been deleted.
The use of the term 'fanboy' is not acceptable, end of discussion.
Anyone who has continued to do so when I wake up in the morning gets two days off, anyone who thinks that point is up for discussion will get the same.
If that's what you think GTP is for then you are unlikely to have a long membership.Thought the whole point of this forum was exactly for BICKERING - seems like gtplanet is heading in the same arrogant plane PD is - ignoring all facts and sticking to their fantasy world!
If that's what you think GTP is for then you are unlikely to have a long membership.
Every member, on joining, agrees to follow the AUP. It's not optional and those who believe it is will soon find out how inaccurate that belief is.
@Jimmy_DA
Yeah. Because reality is only for cynicism and always doomed by anger and sadness.
You must be fun at parties.
Whine the game, not other users.
I believe Scaff's point was about "bickering". You're free to whine and cry all you like, but bickering (pointless arguing) with others isn't encouraged.The thread is titled "
The GT6 Epic Whining and Crying Thread"
Can't really impose people for doing exactly what the title states?
cynicism is only used to hide ones feelings. If something is (what I see) crap then it's crap, no point pretending it's not. If so it's just fooling ones self.
Where have I whined at or attacked another user? I merely quoted scaff for the purpose of my point. You on the other hand have made it personal frzgt by implying your post @Jimmy_DA and stating I must be fun at parties .
I'm well aware of the title of the tread, I've been moderating it longer that you've been a member, as such I don't really need a reminder.The thread is titled "
The GT6 Epic Whining and Crying Thread"
Can't really impose people for doing exactly what the title states?
WHY ISN'T MY FORD FOCUS RS '09 IN GT6 YET! WHY ARE ITS ENGINE SOUNDS STILL SO BAD! WHY ISN'T THE CM HERE YET!
Don't worry guys, I'll bring the thread back on topic and hope some people don't corner me like before.
^^^ That, is what this thread is made for @Jimmy_DA, not "bickering" such as making pointless arguements, insulting and ganging up on certain users to create such. The term "you know what" is definitely not used anywhere on the forum.
Although you are certainly right concerning the need for adjustable aids and options, it's also the race formula that shares the blame. Chasing rabbits can only create unrealistic races where you have to pass the whole field with a 30 seconds deficit and the AI has to be slow so you have a chance. This can't be changed by turning aids off. So basically the game formula in itself is also childish and has to be changed if they would want to cater for their old school racing fan crowd.I wouldn't mind PD making GT more aimed towards casual players if they had included options to cater to hardcore players as well.
PD could set up the game so that all driving aids are enabled by default, set default sim options to damage off, fuel/tire wear off, corner cutting/collision penalties off, easiest AI difficulty, shortest race distance. Then give players freedom to change any of those options in all game modes. In that way casual players could still enjoy the game without the need to change any settings while advanced players could change the game options to make the game more challenging & interesting for them.
It makes no sense to set up the game to cater to one group of players while totally ignoring another group of players, especially taking into account that the elements needed to make races more realistic are already in the game, PD could easily include the option to adjust the things mentioned above in an update.
I agree.Although you are certainly right concerning the need for adjustable aids and options, it's also the race formula that shares the blame. Chasing rabbits can only create unrealistic races where you have to pass the whole field with a 30 seconds deficit and the AI has to be slow so you have a chance. This can't be changed by turning aids off. So basically the game formula in itself is also childish and has to be changed if they would want to cater for their old school racing fan crowd.
PD's focus on a realistic physics model doesn't suit the genre. Game isn't exciting or fun enough to be a good arcade racer neitherWho agrees that GT is better suited to arcade-style racing? I don't know maybe this whole "trying to be a simulator racer" is a bit too hard for PD nowadays. Aren't they bored of it? I know I would...
Enough with the bickering. The noise has been deleted.
The use of the term 'fanboy' is not acceptable, end of discussion.
Anyone who has continued to do so when I wake up in the morning gets two days off, anyone who thinks that point is up for discussion will get the same.