The GTP Unofficial 2020 US Elections Thread

GTPlanet Exit Poll - Which Presidential Ticket Did You Vote For?

  • Trump/Pence

    Votes: 16 27.1%
  • Biden/Harris

    Votes: 20 33.9%
  • Jorgensen/Cohen

    Votes: 7 11.9%
  • Hawkins/Walker

    Votes: 1 1.7%
  • La Riva/Freeman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • De La Fuente/Richardson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Blankenship/Mohr

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Carroll/Patel

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Simmons/Roze

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Charles/Wallace

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 15 25.4%

  • Total voters
    59
  • Poll closed .
Just who are they trying to fool? It's like saying the planes involved in 9/11 were just flying by the WTC. There's hours of professional and amateur video footage that proves these events are exactly what they are. Terrorist attacks, saying otherwise is just beyond pathetic. Own it or show it the contempt it deserves. Don't try and dress it up as something it clearly wasn't.
 
I reckon their idiot base have long since made up their minds how Jan 6th panned out. I don't believe they require any further reassurance.
Sure, but then pandering is...a thing. It may well be indicative of how they actually view their base that they're compelled to keep going lest some new shiny thing comes along to pull focus away.

Edit: Or perhaps it's outright dysfunction.

Before November 2020, most Americans who’d seen Mike Lindell on television had encountered either an infomercial for MyPillow or a newsmagazine profile of the company he founded in 2004. Since then he’s been hard to avoid, popping up on Fox News, OAN, Newsmax, late night talk shows, and even his own social media platform as the face of former President Donald Trump’s ongoing effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Lindell has used many of his appearances to tout four documentaries he’s released that purport to reveal evidence of voter fraud and foreign interference via hacking and flipped votes. He’s being sued by Dominion Voting Systems for $1.3 billion, most of his claims have been debunked repeatedly, and none of his efforts have yielded any real evidence that would overturn the election. And yet he persists.

In fact, he announced earlier this month that in August he will be hosting a “cyber forensic symposium” in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, where a panel of experts will review his latest batch of evidence and, he believes, go on to persuade the Supreme Court to vote to overturn the election.

“I feel right now, we’re in the biggest revival in history to bring our country back to God,” Lindell tells me. “I know when we get through this, it's going to be a great uniting of our country to get back to one nation under God. And I really truly believe that.”

To understand what makes Lindell so driven and so confident in his beliefs, we have to go back to 2015.

That was the year, Lindell says, that a lot of “divine things” happened. At a National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C., Lindell said he was one of 12 people chosen to pray with Ben Carson. He was told by someone at the event that certain attendees would “change the course of history,” which he says felt like another divine moment.

In the summer of 2016, Lindell said Trump reached out to him and asked to meet at Trump Tower in New York City, where they spoke about bringing “the manufacturing back to the country” and Trump’s plan to stop “drugs from pouring in,” among other things. “I’m very good at reading people, and I’m going, this guy only has one agenda, and that is he loves his country and loves people,” he said.

Trump’s message touched on two issues close to Lindell’s heart.

Lindell, a born-again Christian, founded MyPillow in 2004 while battling a crack addiction. He had a dream about a pillow one night and came up with the name MyPillow and an idea for a pillow factory. A year and a half later, while still using drugs, Lindell invented the pillow he still sells today day. By 2008, Lindell said, his addiction had gotten so bad that his drug dealer staged an intervention and refused to sell to him. By 2009, he was clean.

As of 2018, according to Hollywood Reporter, Lindell was worth $300 million. He’s still at the helm of the company, but he estimates that he spends 90 percent of his 17-hour workdays on the voter fraud campaign. Most days he wakes up at around 6:30 a.m., and before he begins running through the list of media interviews lined up for the morning, he gets on the phone with his prayer group to, as he says, thank the Lord for all the great things he has. Lindell believes the things that are yet to come will be great too.

To him, it all seems very simple: The 2020 presidential election was stolen, we’ll soon have new evidence to prove it, the Supreme Court will overturn the election, and Trump will once again be president. And with Trump back in office, and a fraudulent election finally made right, the country can begin moving closer to God. And, that, according to Lindell, means the future is very bright.

“When he has something set in his mind, he's going to go to the very end,” said Joe Schmieg, a high school classmate of Lindell’s who works for MyPillow and supports Lindell’s effort. “He knows he's not going to give up or surrender.”

According to Schmieg, there’s something divine about what Lindell is doing. Schmieg doesn’t know why this task has fallen on Lindell’s shoulders, but says that maybe Lindell is the only one who has enough courage.

The subjects of Lindell’s theories are less impressed. Dominion Voting Systems CEO John Poulos has called him a liar who has “undermined trust in American democracy and tarnished the hard work of local election officials.”

Lindell has remained undaunted even as the court challenges he endorsed failed, and even as his videos have been removed from mainstream streaming platforms like YouTube and Vimeo. (They can be viewed on Lindell’s recently launched “social media platform,” Frank.) After Dominion Voting Systems sued him for $1.3 billion in February, Lindell filed a countersuit against Dominion for $1.6 billion in April, claiming the suit interfered with free speech. In June, Lindell filed another suit in federal court in Minnesota against Dominion and Smartmatic, another company that provides voter technology.

Lindell’s videos have been fact checked repeatedly by The Dispatch Fact Check and other outlets. I wondered how he would respond to direct questions about the claims he continues to make even after they’ve been debunked. We spoke on the phone four times for a total of about two and a half hours. I had questions about Absolute Proof, Absolute Interference, and Absolute 9-0, the three documentaries I’ve fact checked, but we also talked about other topics, including his relationship with Donald Trump.

In Absolute Proof, Lindell and his expert claim that votes in Antrim County, Michigan, were switched from Trump to Biden. It’s a claim we have fact checked before. The conspiracy holds that Antrim County misreported unofficial voter results. But the mistake, which election officials have said was the result of “human error,” was quickly corrected and did not affect the final vote tally, according to Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson.

Benson further explained the incident last year, noting that there was not a software issue in Antrim County, but rather “the clerk accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data and report unofficial results.” She also noted that there was no scenario in which such a mistake would not have been corrected before results were finalized: “Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass. Boards of County Canvassers, which are composed of two Democrats and two Republicans, review the printed totals tape from each tabulator during the canvass to verify the reported vote totals are correct.”

In her testimony before a Michigan legislative committee in November, Antrim County clerk Sheryl Guy, a Republican, said that “human errors did occur that led to incorrect election night reporting.” She emphasized that the “human error did not in any shape or form affect the official election results of Antrim County.”

Why use this claim as an example of fraud after it’d been so easily debunked? Lindell never answered that question directly, but did respond with the following:
“[Jocelyn Benson] is corrupt. I don’t say that about too many people, but I do tell you, I only tell you facts. She is corrupt. She's compromised and she’s lying. In Antrim County, Michigan, 7,000 votes were flipped when they did that audit … She threw away parts they needed and she even admitted that she did it. The FBI was brought in and she still wasn’t arrested. Nobody knows why, but that secretary of state in Michigan, one of the most corrupt ladies I've ever known. And what she did … we proved a hundred percent that just shy of 7,000 votes were flipped. And they said, ‘Oh, it was a mistake, an error.’ No, it wasn’t an error. It matches the PCAP I have perfectly.”
Later, I asked Lindell about Melissa Carone, a Dominion Voting System contractor and self-described whistleblower who appears in Absolute Proof. Carone, who went viral earlier this year when she testified before a Michigan election fraud hearing next to Rudy Giuliani, claims to have witnessed workers scanning the same ballots multiple times, but there was no corroborating evidence to substantiate her claims. Lindell said her allegations were “organic fraud” and that “it matches what the deviation would be because Michigan in the middle of the night counted a hundred and some thousand votes for Biden.”

I followed up by asking him what he made of the fact that the Wayne County circuit judge Timothy M. Kenny described Carone’s allegations as “simply not credible.” Lindell clearly had no idea who I was talking about. “You’re telling me stuff I don’t know,” he told me. “My stuff is cyber evidence from the machine hacks, and now you're going to start talking about evidence that I consider organic.”

He was not entirely clear about what he meant by “organic,” but he was adamant that this type of cheating falls into its own distinctive category. On the topic of Carone and “organic cheating”, Lindell also added:
“Anybody that said they had a good election, either was completely delusional, or they were compromised. They were completely delusional or compromised because this all happened. You don't get 106,000 votes for Biden. You stop the election. Arizona takes a week to count 2 percent, but Michigan downloads 106,000 votes with three fobs. Now, I can sit here and tell you all the evidence that everybody has. I call it organic cheating, and that's what they had to do because Donald Trump was gonna win the election anyway in spite of the algorithm.”
In his latest documentary, Absolute 9-0, Lindell focuses heavily on allegations of electronic cheating, and in particular, alleged “packet captures” that he claims reveal vote-switching. As a source explained in our fact check, PCAP, or packet capture, is a standard networking way to view traffic over the internet. “Traffic over the internet is sent as packets of information. They aren’t encrypted, necessarily, but they are encoded, because they don’t need to be human-readable while they’re in transit.”

The basic premise in Absolute 9-0 is that Lindell has data—PCAPs that he intercepted—that allegedly show exactly how many votes were stolen. This allegation, too, simply doesn’t hold up. Douglas Jones, an associate professor of computer science at the University of Iowa, told The Dispatch Fact Check that “the only way to capture packets addressed to and from all those different election offices around the country would be to have the resources of the [National Security Agency].” He added: “If his data is real and not entirely fictional, the only source would be someone inside the NSA providing it. This would be a felony violation of U.S. law—actually a compound felony.”

I told Lindell that I reported that the PCAPs, which appear in the film as illegible data moving across the screen, weren’t PCAPs at all, but were actually Pennsylvania voter information. If the PCAPs show with “100 percent certainty” that the election was stolen, why didn’t he share them in the film? Lindell laughs, as if it’s absurd to suggest he share the PCAPs on camera. He tells me the data was just B-roll, and of course it’s not the PCAPs because “there’s a big danger to do that.”

“I’m not going to show the PCAPs on national TV,” he said. “If people find out the IP addresses and computer ID’s,” they might destroy the evidence. “Dominion Voting Systems,” he said, “is destroying a lot of the evidence.”

Eight months after the election, Lindell has not slowed his efforts at showing the election was stolen. And Donald Trump is still making similar claims, at rallies and in public statements. But Lindell says they don’t talk regularly—maybe once a month, he said, and when they do, they don’t discuss the work Lindell is doing. The last time they spoke, according to Lindell, Trump told him his appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live in April was “courageous.”

In an email, Jones, the Iowa computer science professor, described Lindell as a “salesman.” In his view, Lindell really believes the things he says. “The best salesmen really believe in their products, and my impression is that he really does believe what he is saying about the election,” said Jones. “That doesn't in any way imply what he is saying is true, because I also suspect that he’s fairly gullible. Truthiness may be sufficient to convince him of truth.” Jones also mentioned that he was “highly suspicious” of the “experts” Lindell depends on. “I strongly suspect that many of them are knowingly fabricating nonsense,” he said.

But Lindell has his believers, and he has his faith. The gravity of this effort seems to weigh heavily on him. “Everything depends on it,” he said.

That’s what Lindell is hoping to prove—finally—with his latest project.

Lindell’s working on a “cyber forensic election symposium,” where says he’ll finally reveal the evidence that will change everything, including the PCAPs, which will be reviewed by eight experts. He says the “proof” he has will persuade the Supreme Court to unanimously vote to reinstate Trump.

The “experts,” he explained, are there to make sure there is absolutely no room for doubt. “I want to make 100 percent sure that it's not even 1 million to 1 percent that something could be inaccurate.”

Lindell says he will also invite “cyber forensic experts” from all over the country as long as, at a minimum, they have Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) credentials, to ask questions and examine the “evidence” for themselves. He says it’ll be like having DNA experts, “renowned people from around the country and even some from five other countries,” he said.

The three-day event, scheduled for August 10-12 in Sioux Falls, South Dakota will be filmed live for the entire world to see, he said. Lindell is inviting the media, but also governors, secretaries of state, and attorneys general. He’s hoping Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, who Lindell describes as “crooked,” are seated front and center, so that they can finally explain “why they stopped the truth from coming out.”

The symposium will also have mock elections, he said. There will be voting system machines from Dominion and Smartmatic, among others, where attendees can line up and vote just like a regular election, he explained. Then participants can tell a white hat hacker to hack a machine by flipping a specific number of votes. The goal, he explained, is to show how easy it is to hack these machines. The white hat hacker will then “pull the PCAP and show everybody ‘here’s the PCAP for that moment in time, where it was hacked.’” PCAPS, Lindell said, are forever preserved and cannot be changed.

When Lindell talks about the symposium he bounces around from detail to detail, often forgetting to finish his thoughts, and more than once incorrectly referring to packet captures as “packet captions” or “cyber captions.”

Finally I asked him the question that seemed to me to be the most obvious—if Absolute Proof and Absolute Interference both prove with “100 percent certainty” that the election was stolen, why did Lindell need to make Absolutely 9-0?

“It’s all a media thing,” he replied. The films “get legs and then they die.” He said he was “so afraid to get to the Supreme Court and they wouldn’t look at [the evidence].” He thought his last film would get more traction than it did, and when it didn’t, he decided instead to bring evidence directly “to the people.”

In Lindell’s view, once the evidence is revealed, and all nine Supreme Court justices vote to overturn the election, they will be heroes. Not only them, but all the “people” (unidentified by Lindell) who unsuccessfully attempted to bring the fraud to light before Lindell, will be heroes too. “These people are going to go down as the heroes of this country to save us.”

On July 26, Lindell was a guest on Steve Bannon’s “War Room: Pandemic” podcast, where he explained that right after the upcoming symposium, as early as the night of the 12th or the morning of the 13th, it’ll be so abundantly clear that Trump won the election that Biden and Harris might just resign. “Maybe Biden and Harris will say, ‘Hey, we’re here to protect the country and resign,” he said. If that were to happen, of course, the new president would not be Trump, but current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Lindell doesn’t seem to be too hung up on the logistics, though. He’s confident that things will play out as they should, so in the meantime, Lindell will soldier on with his work. He can’t stop now because, for him, there’s simply too much on the line. “I will spend every dime I have to save this country,” he said. “Our future is at stake for this country, so, no, I will never back down.”
 
Last edited:
At any rate there's no way the Trumpies were rioting in DC because they were too busy walking around praying, says Michele Bachman.


Christian Extremism really is gigantic threat to this country. Even if they're not committing physical violence, the delusion and brain washing they're doing are just stepping stones.
 


Smooth.

He sounds like...oh, I don't know...an assistant college wrestling coach that knows the team physician is sexually abusing the young men in his charge but wants to protect his colleague.
 
Last edited:
Sorry to poison this thread with a Gateway Pundit link but after Mike Lindell has pulled his ads from Fox News after they failed to advertise his latest election integrity "symposium" it looks like the narrative is once again that the network is no longer conservative.
 
Last edited:
Is it too much to hope that they'll cancel each other out?

Let them fight.gif
 
Last edited:
As far as I'm aware there is no court precedent for that, so, you know. Maybe it is. Maybe it isn't. But it could be. But it might not.
Tune in to "All The President's Lawyers" on Wednesdays on KCRW. There just might be something on it next episode, and even if there's not, it's sure to be an informative and entertaining listen anyway.

 
Last edited:
From Aljazeera:

President Donald Trump urged senior US Department of Justice (DOJ) officials to declare the 2020 election results “corrupt” in a December phone call, according to handwritten notes from one of the participants in the conversation.

The notes of the December 27 call, released Friday by the House Oversight Committee, underscore the lengths to which Trump went to try to overturn the results of the election and to elicit the support of law enforcement officials and other government leaders in that effort.

“Understand that the DOJ can’t + won’t snap its fingers + change the outcome of the election,” then-Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen is quoted as telling the former president, according to notes (PDF) taken by Richard Donoghue, a senior Justice Department official who was on the December 27 call.

“Don’t expect you to do that,” Trump said. “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the R. Congressmen.”

Just weeks earlier, Trump’s own Attorney General William Barr had declared the department had found no evidence of widespread fraud that could have overturned the results. Rosen repeated this conclusion to Trump during their conversation.

“Sir we have done dozens of investig., hundreds of interviews, major allegations are not supported by evid. developed,” Rosen said, according to Donoghue’s notes.

At one point Trump accused Rosen of not “following the internet the way I do” in coming up with allegations of voter fraud.

We are doing our job,” Rosen told Trump. “Much of the info you’re getting is false.”



This is what it's come to. :ouch:
 
Last edited:
Okay, the lede here is ****ing hilarious.
Top members of the Department of Justice last year rebuffed another DOJ official who asked them to urge officials in Georgia to investigate and perhaps overturn President Joe Biden's victory in the state -- long a bitter point of contention for former President Donald Trump and his team -- before the results were certified by Congress, emails reviewed by ABC News show.

The emails, dated Dec. 28, 2020, show the former acting head of DOJ's civil division, Jeffrey Clark, circulating a draft letter -- which he wanted then-acting attorney general Jeffrey Rosen and acting deputy attorney general Richard Donoghue to sign off on -- urging Georgia's governor and other top officials to convene the state legislature into a special session so lawmakers could investigate claims of voter fraud.

"The Department of Justice is investigating various irregularities in the 2020 election for President of the United States," the draft letter said. "The Department will update you as we are able on investigatory progress, but at this time we have identified significant concerns that may have impacted the outcome of the election in multiple States, including the State of Georgia."

The draft letter states: "While the Department of Justice believes the Governor of Georgia should immediately call a special session to consider this important and urgent matter, if he declines to do so, we share with you our view that the Georgia General Assembly has implied authority under the Constitution of the United States to call itself into special session for [t]he limited purpose of considering issues pertaining to the appointment of Presidential Electors."

The vote count in Georgia became a flashpoint for Trump and his allies and Trump at one point falsely claimed that it was "not possible" for him to have lost the state.

But to date, the Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that would tip the results of the presidential election. Attorney General William Barr also announced in December that the department had "not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome of the election." A statewide audit in Georgia last year also affirmed that Biden was the winner.

The emails were provided by the DOJ to the House Oversight Committee, which is investigating efforts to overturn the election results. And they come as the DOJ investigator general looks at whether any officials in the department sought to overturn the outcome of the election.

Last week the Department of Justice sent letters to six former Trump DOJ officials telling them that they can participate in Congress' investigation into the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. One of those letters was to former Associate Deputy AG Patrick Hovakimian, who sources said sat for a transcribed interview Tuesday morning with the House Oversight Committee.

Notes from Donoghue released last week appeared to show that Trump tried to pressure the DOJ to assert that there was significant fraud in the election.

ABC News has requested comment from Clark but has not yet received a response. A spokesperson for the House Oversight Committee did not immediately respond to request for comment, nor did an attorney for Donoghue.

Clark attached the draft letter in an email to Rosen and Donoghue telling them "I think we should get it out as soon as possible."

"Personally, I see no valid downsides to sending out the letter," Clark wrote. "I put it together quickly and would want to do a formal cite check before sending but I don't think we should let unnecessary moss grow on this."

Clark separately asked for Rosen and Donoghue to authorize them to receive a classified briefing led by then-Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe the next day related to "foreign election interference issues," while referencing an unspecified theory about hackers having evidence that a Dominion voting machine "accessed the Internet through a smart thermostat with a net connection trail leading back to China."

Donoghue responded a little more than an hour later shooting down Clark's request to sign on to the draft letter.

"There is no chance that I would sign this letter or anything remotely like this," Donoghue said. "While it maybe true that the Department 'is investigating various irregularities in the 2020 election for President' (something we typically would not state publicly) the investigations that I am aware of relate to suspicions of misconduct that are of such a small scale that they simply would not impact the outcome of the Presidential Election."

Donoghue closed his email response by stating that, while he was available to speak to Clark directly about his request, "from where I stand, this is not even within the realm of possibility."

Donoghue cited former Attorney General William Barr's previous statements that the department had no indication fraud had impacted the election to a significant degree, and that no information had surfaced since Barr's departure that changed that assessment.

"Given that," he said, "I cannot imagine a scenario in which the Department would recommend that a State assemble its legislature to determine whether already-certified election results should somehow be overriden by legislative action."

He added that the draft letter's statement that DOJ would update lawmakers on the investigatory progress was "dubious as we do not typically update non-law enforcement personnel on the progress of any investigations."

Later that evening, Rosen responded as well, telling both Clark and Donoghue, "I confirmed again today that I am not prepared to sign such a letter."

The New York Times reported in January about Clark appealing to Donoghue and Rosen to co-sign the draft letter.

In the days after the exchange, as ABC News has previously confirmed, both Rosen and Donoghue thwarted an attempt by Clark to have Trump appoint him acting attorney general.
"Long a bitter point of contention for former President Donald Trump and his team."

:lol:
 
Okay, the lede here is ****ing hilarious.

"Long a bitter point of contention for former President Donald Trump and his team."

:lol:
Traitors gonna traitor but it sounds like he got away with a slap on the wrist. Why aren't guys like this getting prosecuted for conspiracy to overthrow the government? What are Dems so scared of that's staying their hand?
 
Why aren't guys like this getting prosecuted for conspiracy to overthrow the government? What are Dems so scared of that's staying their hand?

Some of them are, but they won't be prosecuted by democrats, they'll be prosecuted by the judicial system. The American judicial system has a pretty high threshold for proving up a crime. These are not easy cases.
 
Traitors gonna traitor but it sounds like he got away with a slap on the wrist. Why aren't guys like this getting prosecuted for conspiracy to overthrow the government? What are Dems so scared of that's staying their hand?
In addition to the remarks above, it needs to be said that there may well be dynamics at play that are not presently known to the public.

Also, investigation of these individuals is likely to require access that simply isn't necessary for the terrorists who stormed the Capitol and it's barely begun in earnest because of efforts to forestall by the right.
 
Some of them are, but they won't be prosecuted by democrats, they'll be prosecuted by the judicial system. The American judicial system has a pretty high threshold for proving up a crime. These are not easy cases.

In addition to the remarks above, it needs to be said that there may well be dynamics at play that are not presently known to the public.

Also, investigation of these individuals is likely to require access that simply isn't necessary for the terrorists who stormed the Capitol and it's barely begun in earnest because of efforts to forestall by the right.
I hope so. I just hope Dems haven't all been voted out of office in time for an incoming Trumpist AG to quash these cases under a future administration. Presumably there are safeguards in place to prevent something like that happening.

[EDIT] I came back to reread this post nearly a year later and I realise now that even if the Democrats aren't in power, an (theoretically) independent judiciary should still end up pursuing cases against those who break the law. Sorry for not listening the first time @Danoff and @TexRex.
 
Last edited:
"He was previously of good character before he aided and abetted an attempt to overthrow the United States Government."

I hope that guy's not conducting his own defence... oh, wait
 
🤣

This one may actually better than the last. Thread.



It's Colorado. It's Dominion.

This is fun:


Aaaaand boom goes the dynamite.
Attorneys who filed a federal lawsuit alleging the 2020 election was fraudulent failed to do their homework, acted in bad faith, did not take notice of well-established legal rules and potentially fueled threats against the lives of election workers with their conspiracy mongering, a federal court in Colorado has concluded.

U.S. Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter, who previously dismissed the baseless civil lawsuit against Facebook, Denver-based voting technology company Dominion Voting Systems, and the leaders of various swing states in the presidential election, issued a thorough and strongly-worded order on Tuesday reprimanding the two lawyers who masterminded the case.

"This lawsuit was filed with a woeful lack of investigation into the law and (under the circumstances) the facts," Neureiter wrote. "The lawsuit put into or repeated into the public record highly inflammatory and damaging allegations that could have put individuals' safety in danger. Doing so without a valid legal basis or serious independent personal investigation into the facts was the height of recklessness."

Neureiter gave the extraordinary direction to Denver attorney Gary D. Fielder and Ernest John Walker, who practices in Michigan and Colorado, to pay the costs of the entities who had to defend against the lawsuit. He noted the U.S. Supreme Court has justified the imposition of sanctions on parties who put forth baseless filings that burden courts "with needless expense and delay."

In April, Neureiter dismissed the class-action lawsuit on behalf of all registered voters, determining there was no claim of a concrete, individual injury and, therefore, no legal standing. The lawsuit included statements like that of Neil Yarbrough of Aurora, who offered no firsthand knowledge of malfeasance, and instead told the court that "if we don't fix this, there may not be any more elections."

Fielder and Walker sought $1,000 in damages per registered American voter, or $160 billion total. That was "greater than the annual GDP of Hungary," Neureiter pointed out in his Aug. 3 order.

The attorneys reportedly raised $95,000 from the public to fund the lawsuit, and their home page still displays a request seeking donations. The graphic reads "Are you a registered voter? ... You may qualify to join the Dominion Class Action."

Stan Garnett, the attorney representing Dominion, said that although Fielder and Walker have appealed the dismissal, he believed the online solicitation was misleading, given Neureiter's findings about the class-action lawsuit's lack of viability.

"Under Colorado law, one has the right to solicit, to get contributions to pursue a lawsuit," he said. "But certainly my view is someone should tell the truth about the lawsuit."

Despite the financial backing, the court pointed out that the lawsuit in Colorado was a "cut-and-paste" from other election challenges, and that Fielder and Walker reportedly had not verified any of the election fraud allegations with an expert prior to filing the lawsuit.

"This court ruling imposing sanctions on lawyers filing bogus post-election claim is important because of the court's detailed factual findings and explanation that the 2020 election was not rigged and Trump fraud claims have been rejected on the merits," Richard L. Hasen, a professor of election law at the University of California, Irvine, wrote on Twitter.

Neither Fielder nor Walker responded to a request for comment. Fielder's disciplinary record in Colorado includes a two-year probation that began in December 2019, following a violation of rules of professional conduct pertaining to client billing practices. As part of his probation, Fielder had to complete an ethics course.

In addition to his lengthy summary of the lawyers' pursuit of a clearly frivolous case, Neureiter's order served to condemn former President Donald Trump's denial of his own loss, drawing a direct line between various lawsuits alleging fraud in the 2020 election and deadly the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

"Post-election, the former President and his supporters' claims of the vote being 'stolen' or 'rigged' resulted in, among other things, serious threats to the safety of both public election officials and private employees of Dominion," Neureiter wrote. Trump's behavior "also raised a substantial doubt about the continuation of what arguably is the United States' greatest political tradition — the unbroken two-century ritual of the peaceful transfer of power."

The allegations of fraud, if believed by a wide enough swath of the public, "are the stuff of which violent insurrections are made," the magistrate judge warned.

"It is the most strongly worded, specific, direct and thorough order I have seen in civil election litigation," said Amber McReynolds, CEO of the National Vote at Home Institute & Coalition and a member of the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service. She added that she was grateful a court was "holding some of these individuals accountable for the destructive nature of the coordinated post-election attempt to overthrow our democracy."

The latest development out of Colorado mirrors the fate of similar lawsuits challenging the validity of the general election in swing states such as Pennsylvania and Georgia, where judges have thrown out claims of vote rigging.
"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here," wrote Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump nominee and member of the Philadelphia-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in November.

Republican-led states have responded to Trump's loss by passing or attempting to enact changes to voting measures, and Arizona's state Senate has commissioned an ostensible audit of votes in Maricopa County. This week, the Republican chair of the county's board of supervisors rebuked the Senate in a letter, writing, "If you haven't figured out that the election in Maricopa County was free, fair and accurate yet, I'm not sure you ever will."
Fielder and Walker had also sought to sue the governors and top election officials for Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Wisconsin — all of which were swing states that President Joe Biden won. Neureiter was baffled at this move, given that the administration of those states' elections was not directed toward Colorado.

The Colorado Bar Association declined to comment on whether professional sanctions against the attorneys were also warranted.

The case is O'Rourke et al. v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al.
 
I guess they wouldn't call them "weasel words" if weaselly weasels didn't use them to weasel out of what was coming to them once in a while.
 
Okay, CNN. How about this:

Put all the Bush Administration cronies on that you want to stump for their new books about how they are smart and woke and good and definitely not people who like Trump. Have nonstop wall-to-wall Chris Cuomo coverage about how outraged he is that all of those women forcefully shoved their breasts into Andrew's face before forcibly reassigning themselves to Alaska in retaliation.




But absolutely do not


And I must insist upon this:


Screenshot_20210806_215448_com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox.jpg


Write your 2020 post-election articles like someone covering a Counter-Strike match.
 
Back