The GTP Unofficial 2020 US Elections Thread

GTPlanet Exit Poll - Which Presidential Ticket Did You Vote For?

  • Trump/Pence

    Votes: 16 27.1%
  • Biden/Harris

    Votes: 20 33.9%
  • Jorgensen/Cohen

    Votes: 7 11.9%
  • Hawkins/Walker

    Votes: 1 1.7%
  • La Riva/Freeman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • De La Fuente/Richardson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Blankenship/Mohr

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Carroll/Patel

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Simmons/Roze

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Charles/Wallace

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 15 25.4%

  • Total voters
    59
  • Poll closed .
The suit also asked for more than $2.9 billion in tax-free damages.
I completely believe this is about election integrity.
 
How on earth did that even get outside of a state court? Did they just appeal and waste money?
 
My favourite thing about the Brunson Brothers is that they're actually somewhat famous trumpeters.

TheBrothers.jpg


Those names are super Utahn too.
 
A newly released audio recording offers a behind-the-scenes look at how former President Donald Trump’s campaign team in a pivotal battleground state knew they had been outflanked by Democrats in the 2020 presidential election. But even as they acknowledged defeat, they pivoted to allegations of widespread fraud that were ultimately debunked — repeatedly — by elections officials and the courts.

The audio from Nov. 5, 2020, two days after the election, is surfacing as Trump again seeks the White House while continuing to lie about the legitimacy of the outcome and Democrat Joe Biden’s win.

The Wisconsin political operatives in the strategy session even praised Democratic turnout efforts in the state’s largest counties and appeared to joke about their efforts to engage Black voters, according to the recording obtained Thursday by The Associated Press. The audio centers on Andrew Iverson, who was the head of Trump’s campaign in the state.

“Here’s the drill: Comms is going to continue to fan the flame and get the word out about Democrats trying to steal this election. We’ll do whatever they need (inaudible) help with. Just be on standby in case there’s any stunts we need to pull,” Iverson said.

Iverson is now the Midwest regional director for the Republican National Committee. He deferred questions about the meeting to the RNC, whose spokesperson, Keith Schipper, declined comment because he had not heard the recording.

The former campaign official and Republican operative who provided a copy of the recording to the AP was in the meeting and recorded it. The operative is not authorized to speak publicly about what was discussed and did not want to be identified out of concern for personal and professional retaliation, but said they came forward because Trump is mounting a third attempt for the White House.

In response to questions about the audio, Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said: “The 2024 campaign is focused on competing in every state and winning in a dominating fashion. That is why President Trump is leading by wide margins in poll after poll.”

Wisconsin was a big part of Trump’s victory in 2016, when he smashed through the Democrats’ so-called “Blue Wall” in the upper Midwest, and his campaign fought hard to keep the swing state in his column four years later before his loss to Biden.

Biden defeated Trump by nearly 21,000 votes in Wisconsin in 2020, a result that has withstood independent and partisan audits and reviews, as well as lawsuits and recounts in the state’s two largest and Democratic-leaning counties.

Yet, two days after the election, there was no discussion of Trump having won the state during the meeting of Republican campaign operatives.

Instead, parts of the meeting focus on discussions about packing up campaign offices and writing final reports about how the campaign unfolded. At one point on the recording, Iverson is heard praising the GOP’s efforts while admitting the margin of Trump’s defeat in the state.

“At the end of the day, this operation received more votes than any other Republican in Wisconsin history,” Iverson said. “Say what you want, our operation turned out Republican or DJT supporters. Democrats just got 20,000 more than us, out of Dane County and other shenanigans in Milwaukee, Green Bay and Dane. There’s a lot that people can learn from this campaign.”

The meeting showcases another juxtaposition of what Republican officials knew about the election results and what Trump and his closest allies were saying publicly as they pushed the lie of a stolen election. Trump was told by his own attorney general there was no sign of widespread fraud, and many within his own administration told the former president there was no substance to various claims of fraud or manipulation — advice Trump repeatedly ignored.

In the weeks after the election, Trump and his allies would file dozens of lawsuits, convene fake electors and pressure election officials in an attempt to overturn the will of the voters and keep Trump in office.

It’s unclear whether the staff in Wisconsin coordinated their message directly with campaign officials in Washington.

Parts of the Nov. 5 meeting also center on Republican outreach efforts to the state’s Black community.

At one point, the operatives laugh over needing “more Black voices for Trump.” Iverson also references their efforts to engage with Black voters.

“We ever talk to Black people before? I don’t think so,” he said, eliciting laughter from others in the room.

Another speaker on the recording with Iverson is identified by the source as GOP operative Clayton Henson. At the time, Henson was a regional director for the RNC in charge of Wisconsin and other Midwestern states. They give a postmortem of sorts on the election, praising Republican turnout and campaign efforts while acknowledging the Democrats’ robust turn-out-the-vote campaign.

Henson specifically references Democratic turnout in Dane County, which includes Madison, the state capital, and is a liberal stronghold in the state. A record-high 80% of the voting-age population cast ballots in 2020 in the county, which Biden won with 76% of the vote.

“Hats off to them for what they did in Dane County. You gotta respect that,” Henson said. “There’s going to be another election in a couple years. So remember the lessons you learned and be ready to punch back.”

Henson, reached by phone Thursday, said, “No thank you” when asked to comment about the meeting.
 
Interesting. What this seems to confirm is a strategy of "appealing to the base" can work ... if you can get enough people to turn out. Did Wisconsin go for Biden because so many voters in the Madison area got to the polls to vote for Biden?

Trump got more votes in 2020 (by a considerable margin) than any previous Republican candidate ... but the pro Biden/anti-Trump vote was still much higher. Do Republicans continue to chase the base, or do they pivot away from Trumpism to try and appeal to more moderate voters?
 
Dominion Voting Systems is seeking summary judgement in its defamation lawsuit against Fox News. In other words, despite the fact that proving defamation is a very high bar to clear. Dominion believes there is so much evidence proving defamation, they are asking the judge to declare that the facts are not in dispute and there is no need for a trial. Everyone at Fox knew the whole "Dominion changed votes" story was a lie, but they pushed it because they were afraid of losing views to Newsmax and OAN. Dominion has the receipts to prove it. Fox is guilty and the only question is how much are they going to pay Dominion?

 
The party of fiscal responsibility.
I feel like the more and more time goes on the less applicable this line is. Sure, "the party of fiscal responsibility" slogan was symbolic with the GOP from Reagan until the fall of the Tea Party. But now? Fiscal responsibility is far from the first thing the Republican party will mention in terms of policy. Hardly got much attention from Trump to begin with. Anti wokeness/degeneracy, stolen elections, the impending threat of socialism, and the borders being "completely open' gets far more airtime.

I have a strong feeling that the average Republican, if asked, would rather the US government to spend billions of dollars more if it means eliminating wokeness, than reducing taxes even more for the wealthiest Americans or passing a balanced budget amendment.
 
Last edited:
I feel like the more and more time goes on the less applicable this line is. Sure, "the party of fiscal responsibility" slogan was symbolic with the GOP from Reagan until the fall of the Tea Party. But now? Fiscal responsibility is far from the first thing the Republican party will mention in terms of policy. Hardly got much attention from Trump to begin with. Anti wokeness/degeneracy, stolen elections, the impending threat of socialism, and the borders being "completely open' gets far more airtime.

I have a strong feeling that the average Republican, if asked, would rather the US government to spend billions of dollars more if it means eliminating wokeness, than reducing taxes even more for the wealthiest Americans or passing a balanced budget amendment.
The fiscally responsible party that when in power, from Reagan onwards, has increased the US national deficit?


It's as much a lie now as it was when Reagan was running it, rather Reagan, Thatcher, and the other fiscally moronic '80s scumbags are largely responsible for the mess much of today's economy is in. Trickle-down was always a lie.
 
Last edited:
Rudy Giuliani's fart sponge censured for stolen election falsehoods.


hero-image.fill.size_1248x702.v1623391584.png

As far as I can tell that censure is a total joke. That's a fancy word for "signed a paper admitting she's dumb and paid a $224 fine". Concise but meaningless. And apparently that tickle on the wrist was enough for the Attorney Regulation Councel to stop pursuing any charges.

The fact that lawyers are basically immune from anything makes me really uncomfortable. I don't think we should allow such a broad industry to effectively be self-regulated by "good will" or whatever. Pilots and doctors sure as hell aren't self-regulated and we've got lives on the line.
 
Last edited:
As far as I can tell that censure is a total joke. That's a fancy word for "signed a paper admitting she's dumb and paid a $224 fine". Concise but meaningless. And apparently that tickle on the wrist was enough for the Attorney Regulation Councel to stop pursuing any charges.
Was it her first offense? The legal system tends to assume that if it's the first time you messed up you should be given a second chance. She should assume that if she gets anywhere near this territory again she will lose her career.

I don't like it because it doesn't send a strong enough message to others. It's too personal, and is too focused her ability to control herself and proceed (this is the same with the Jan. 6th people), but others who would do similar are watching right now. For some kinds of offenses it becomes about what you're telling the population at large rather than the individual. I don't feel like it takes into consideration the gravity of this particular situation.
 
Last edited:
Was it her first offense? The legal system tends to assume that if it's the first time you messed up you should be given a second chance. She should assume that if she gets anywhere near this territory again she will lose her career.
That's a pretty hefty jump but somehow I doubt that'll ever happen. Bottom line is her first offense for lying through her teeth during government hearings on one of the biggest cases of the decade was essentially a speeding ticket. I'm not sure how to factor in the public aspect of this, the fact that everybody in the country knows all she got was a speeding ticket and everybody thinks that's ridiculous. Perhaps simply being recognized while out at dinner is enough punishment for her actions.
 
Perhaps simply being recognized while out at dinner is enough punishment for her actions.
Well there's being a lawyer and then there's being a lawyer. A lot of reputable firms and companies will not want to do business with her after her censure. It will damage her career for sure. But I think, in this particular instance, that may not have been harsh enough.
 
Back