The GTP Unofficial 2020 US Elections Thread

GTPlanet Exit Poll - Which Presidential Ticket Did You Vote For?

  • Trump/Pence

    Votes: 16 27.1%
  • Biden/Harris

    Votes: 20 33.9%
  • Jorgensen/Cohen

    Votes: 7 11.9%
  • Hawkins/Walker

    Votes: 1 1.7%
  • La Riva/Freeman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • De La Fuente/Richardson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Blankenship/Mohr

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Carroll/Patel

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Simmons/Roze

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Charles/Wallace

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 15 25.4%

  • Total voters
    59
  • Poll closed .
That's... not how it works. You don't pretend to be Trump and take the test, political analysts apply the stated policies, beliefs, voting record, and - for incumbents - laws and orders passed to the statements of the test. I already covered that here.
That test was taken by a human. And I do not trust whoever that was.
I spent three years hearing from the American media, that Trump was elected because of Putin. Pardon me if I don't trust the media.
Apart from just then. I'm not sure what being American has to do with it - it's part of the US language too.
I grew up in Louisville Kentucky, Joined the army and went to Fort Jackson South Carolina, then Fort Gordon Georgia, then Fort Bragg North Carolina, then, Sandhofen West Germany, then, after four years I got out of the army, I moved Tracy California, now Houston Texas. I have NEVER heard this word EVER uttered, ever,

I think the first time I ever heard of it was from the title of a Sex Pistols album. And I have seen it on Brittish stuff.

I am not 100% sure what it even means, I think it means testicals, but I'm not really sure.

If we can’t place Trump on a scale from left to right, on the grounds that he did not take a quiz, how do you know that he is not in fact to the left of Joe Biden? How do you know that he is not a Marxist?
pffft. Actions speak louder than words.

I am beginning to think Joe Biden is just the Bob Dole of this new election. Republicans knew they could not beat Bill Clinton, so they sent in Dole. He was old, but it was his turn. This was the 1996 election, before Lewinsky, but after the "The era of big government is over" speach

Democrats, before corona, coalesced behind Biden. At the time, all of the economic numbers were up, in Trump's America, everyone was winning.

It was kind of them to let Biden have the nomination. But after Covid, they thought they might have a chance to win.
 
So it is in fact possible to determine where they are placed on the scale without having them take a quiz.
In addition, if Trump really is a closet anarcho-syndicalist (or whatever) and is simply just lying about his policy position, then how would that make him any more trustworthy?

It sounds like someone is sticking his fingers in his ears so hard that maybe his constant "pffft" noises are the air being forced out of his cranial cavity. Perhaps that's why he hasn't provided any additional evidence or facts to counter @Famine's patient explanations of how Political Compass works.

Meanwhile back in the world of reality, perhaps more worrying is that GOP supporters online appear to have subtly shifted their onslaught of attacks on Biden in the face of contradictory evidence like the chart above.

In their eyes he's apparently no longer a raving socialist but is so out of touch that the real radical left like Kamala will twist his policies and have us eating our pets before you know it. 'Course, Kamala isn't a leftie either, but I guess that’s another story.
 
That test was taken by a human. And I do not trust whoever that was.

So where would you place Trump and Biden? There's always going to be quibbling over the exact placement, I'd imagine you have a reasonable idea of the general area they would land in and their relative positions to each other on the two axes.
 
That test was taken by a human. And I do not trust whoever that was.
Politicians are humans.
I spent three years hearing from the American media, that Trump was elected because of Putin. Pardon me if I don't trust the media.
Okay. Not sure what the relevance is.
pffft. Actions speak louder than words.
And, as described, that's how the compass works. For those already serving in office, their voting records - that is their actions when the issues come up for voting - are part of the analysis of their position. For those who don't already serve in office, or where issues that are part of the compass have not come up for voting so they have not been able to vote on them, their stated position, policies, and manifestos are part of the analysis of their position.
I grew up in Louisville Kentucky, Joined the army and went to Fort Jackson South Carolina, then Fort Gordon Georgia, then Fort Bragg North Carolina, then, Sandhofen West Germany, then, after four years I got out of the army, I moved Tracy California, now Houston Texas. I have NEVER heard this word EVER uttered, ever,

I think the first time I ever heard of it was from the title of a Sex Pistols album. And I have seen it on Brittish stuff.

I am not 100% sure what it even means, I think it means testicals, but I'm not really sure.
Your life experience isn't particularly relevant. I've never heard anyone ever utter the word "ostentiferous", but it's part of the English language (and US English). Similarly "bollocks" is part of the US English language, even if it's not a particularly commonly used one.

Nonetheless you miss the point about GTPlanet's requirements for censoring expletive - and your uncensored expletive still appears to be uncensored despite me pointing it out to you...
 
Last edited:
When a few folks shown during the RNC don't actually like Trump & more rules are broken.
It started with an unexpected call last week from Lynne Patton, a longtime Trump associate who oversees federal housing programs in New York.

Ms. Patton told a leader of a tenants’ group at the New York City Housing Authority, the nation’s largest, that she was interested in speaking with residents about conditions in the authority’s buildings, which have long been in poor repair.

Four tenants soon assembled in front of a video camera and were interviewed for more than four hours by Ms. Patton herself. They were never told that their interviews would be edited into a two-minute video clip that would air on Thursday night at the Republican National Convention and be used to bash Mayor Bill de Blasio, three of the tenants said in interviews on Friday.

“I am not a Trump supporter,” said one of the tenants, Claudia Perez. “I am not a supporter of his racist policies on immigration. I am a first-generation Honduran. It was my people he was sending back.”
The episode represents another stark example of how President Trump has deployed government resources to further his political ambitions. Ms. Patton is head of the New York office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and under the Hatch Act is barred from using her government position to engage in political activities.

Throughout the convention, Mr. Trump has shattered the traditional boundaries between government and politics, and the video was aired on a night when the campaign took over the South Lawn of the White House, the first time that a major political convention has occurred there.

The public housing clip was the second instance of the Trump campaign’s misleading participants in an event involving the federal government that was filmed for the Republican National Convention. On Tuesday, the convention showed a video of five new American citizens being sworn in at a naturalization ceremony by Mr. Trump. Some of the five said they did not know that they were being filmed for a political event.

Three of the four tenants in the public housing video were interviewed on Friday by The New York Times. All three said they opposed President Trump and were misled about the purpose of the video.

In the video, the tenants raised concerns about conditions in the housing authority’s buildings, attacking Mr. de Blasio’s housing record. Ms. Perez, one of the tenants, said in an interview on Friday afternoon that she stood by her criticism of the authority but was furious about being tricked into appearing in the video.
Ms. Perez said she had been called last week by another tenant leader, Carmen Quiñones, who said Ms. Patton was with her at the Frederick Douglass Houses in Manhattan and wanted to talk to residents about the housing authority’s performance.
Only after the questioning ended were the four tenants told that the interview was for the Republican Party, Ms. Perez said. But she said she was never told that it was for the convention.

Ms. Perez said she demanded to see the edited version of the clip, but no one ever showed it to her. She added that Ms. Quiñones called her minutes before the clip aired on Thursday night to say that it was about to be shown.

During the pandemic, Ms. Perez and Ms. Quiñones have helped to provide hundreds of thousands of meals to residents who would not have had food otherwise. One of the vendors who provided the food, a farming company owned by Muslims, called an associate of Ms. Perez on Friday and asked why she appeared in a video supporting Mr. Trump, Ms. Perez said.

Ms. Patton declined to be interviewed, saying that she was traveling. But she issued a statement denying that she misled the four tenants, saying that they knew that their interviews would be shown at the convention “to increase awareness of the inhumane conditions that Mayor de Blasio has allowed for far too long.”

“Each participated regardless of political party because they recognized the importance of having a voice on the national stage and the undeniable improvements that have transpired under this administration,” Ms. Patton said.

She said she supports the Democratic Party except for one person, Mr. de Blasio, whom she blamed for what she said were worsening conditions at the Douglass Houses in Manhattan and across the housing authority, which has 400,000 tenants.
The third tenant, Mr. Martinez, said he was asked to take part in the meeting with Ms. Patton with little notice, but took up the opportunity to air his concerns about public housing. “This was not an endorsement of Trump,” he said.

Mr. de Blasio did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

But on Thursday night, his press secretary, Bill Neidhardt, called the video a “cynical attempt to pit Black Americans against immigrants,” a reference to an assertion in the video that undocumented immigrants had been allowed to cut in line to get housing before American citizens.

“It’s wrong,” Mr. Neidhardt
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/28/...video-trump.html?referringSource=articleShare

The article is behind a paywall, so I'm posting it here in full.
 
That's what happens when you agree to sit down and do an interview. You know the person doing the interview is only gonna use the clips they want.
Cry me a river...
 
That's what happens when you agree to sit down and do an interview. You know the person doing the interview is only gonna use the clips they want.
Cry me a river...
Conduct an interview about the current state of GTPlanet. Air some of your grievances.

The interviewer turns around & manipulates your words as a way to attack Jordan and promote another member for Staff that you don't actually like.


You find that perfectly fine?
 
Conduct an interview about the current state of GTPlanet. Air some of your grievances.

The interviewer turns around & manipulates your words as a way to attack Jordan and promote another member for Staff that you don't actually like.


You find that perfectly fine?
Unlike Papa John's I don't think there is a panel here that can kick him off of HIS OWN site.
Now how the interview goes well that's on him for wanting to sit down in the first place. You can't play with people's words if they don't say anything, even though someone will say silence is...

Anyways.

 
If someone dishonestly uses your words to promote a cause that you don't believe in like the GOP did with those tenants then that's dishonest and you should be allowed to complain as loudly as you want.

To argue otherwise is like saying Trump or his Trumpers can't complain if Biden uses his words for a speech because he did an interview and his words are in the public domain.
 
That's what happens when you agree to sit down and do an interview. You know the person doing the interview is only gonna use the clips they want.
Cry me a river...

Dishonesty, especially with an enormous power disparity, is not a good basis on which to govern @ryzno! Stop being so cynical.
 
I literally gave no idea why I was tagged in that post!

I think you're supposed to ban me. I had a good run I guess.

edit:

giphy.gif
 
Wait, I was told Biden just reused his speech from 2008, now his DNC speech is from Trump? Which would mean... Trump stole Biden's speech from 2008?


This is what happens when ya'll just gulp down everything your biased sources say. Can't even keep the argument straight. :lol:
Provide a link with your claim...
 
Provide a link with your claim...
No. Because the last time I wrote out the entire transcripts, the member in question moved the goal posts. And your history doesn't particularly give me much belief you won't do something similar.

Edit*
I just watched a few minutes of your video. Absolute nonsense that you bought full into b/c, as history on this forum recalls, you've demonstrated an issue with being told to wear masks which is frankly no surprise b/c your political viewpoints & anti-maskers are almost hand-in-hand at this point. That is the entire basis of that video:

What Joe Biden's plan is for the coronavirus vs. what Donald Trump's plan for the coronavirus has been so far.

There is no actual speech stolen. It is claiming that both plans are the same when it has been undeniably shown they're not. Trump has continuously ignored what has worked for the rest of the world.

Mark Kaye is also 1 stupid bastard trying to twist the "muzzles off the experts" comment by claiming Democrats muzzled those Doctors who spoke out about using hydroxychloroquine, zinc, & zpacks as verified treatment. The same doctors whose leader believes in demon sperm & alien DNA....

What a waste of time you guys continually post on this forum with these garbage videos.
 
Last edited:
Back