I do too. They're obviously different in nearly every way (they may share a center cap?), but they feel like a GT 10-hole. I think it's the finish?I like it.
And on a second gen Blazer, but not a ZR2, with appropriate tires for a non-ZR2.Another GM compact SUV, this time a first gen Blazer on second gen ZR2 alloys.
No, they are 19" 964 Cup wheels with lots of little holes in them. Squint, you'll see.No. Lobster claws are the C5 wagon wheels of Stuttgart.
Most definitely...I wouldn't call those OEM exactly...probably from Augment meant to look like E36 M3 wheels but at least 20, if not 21".
This, the SC/Soarer and the contemporary Eldorado/Seville all had basic silhouettes and styling that was severely let down by where wheel technology was at the time of their debut. None of them (except perhaps the Greyhound Seville) by any means look as resolved as something like the XK-8 did even in this case (the Mark VIII is still too large for its own good, for example), but the wheels on this specific one (while perhaps a touch large) go a long way towards fixing a major issue with the styling of brought on by the standard (I'm guessing) 16 inch wheels that it had paired with humongous, empty wheel wells making what was actually a fairly sleek (albeit too large) car look instead like a Caprice-style lardass with curves just spilling over itself. It's a problem that affects basically all American cars from the 90s with that sort of styling except the Corvette, Viper, Mustang Cobras and V8 Camaro/Firebirds. So many swoopy shrink wrapped rounded low beltline cars of the era were let down by not having at least the option for 17inch wheels that even the 300ZX, as fantastic of a design as it is, is just a tiny bit under-wheeled.