mister dog
(Banned)
- 8,396
- Spain
- misterdog
- misterdog7
Air support is a huge factor, using mostly drones to minimize risk to US personnel, they can precision strike everyone of these nutjobs if they are on the move and in a open field, this means they cannot advance anymore and will have to retreat. As long as the US keeps hitting them where possible, the Kurds and Iraqi forces will be able to recapture a lot of ground having air superiority in the pocket over these savages.At an emotional level I completely agree. Especially, my heart goes out to all those innocent people like the Yazidis who are reportedly buried alive by the hundreds merely for the sin of heresy. (Yazidi religion predates Islam by a thousand years or more).
On the other hand, the Kurds will need some military assistance to fend off the US heavy weapons ISIS is using to threaten Erbil, where numbers of Americans are stationed. Until Kurds get better weapons, artillery threatening Erbil must be neutralized by someone.
According to a recent article by the NY Times, Mr. Baghdadi who established and runs ISIS, surrounds himself with Ba'athists, Republican Guards and former members of Saddam Hussein's intelligence establishment. These are the former educated elite of Iraqi society, not religious nutcases, and some of them are secularists.
So it seems to me the weakest point of ISIS is its unlikely combination of religious zealots and secularists. My strategy would be to split them, cut off their money, men and weapons supply. This may be possible without too much bombing. I don't want the US getting involved in another expensive, open-ended, and ultimately unwinnable war.
Edit: Rescue mission evacuating children and the other lucky souls that happened to be near the helicopter when it landed:
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/11/world/meast/iraq-rescue-mission/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Last edited: