- 4,569
- Moscow
- Rage_Racer_VOLK
- RageRacer48
Reports of a counter-terrorist operation going on in Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Some islamist insugrents are blocked in an apartment.
Some islamist insugrents are blocked in an apartment.
You got to admire the Russians. At least they know how to deal with 'the threat'.http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...un-axe-allegiance-video-chechen-a7198731.html
Well, that attack attempt in Russia didn't go so well. No humans were killed.
From what I heard - all militants eliminated, one Spetsnaz officer wounded, but no damage to civilians.@Rage Racer how did that end?
...And the US-led coalition has just bombed the SAA, killing 62.Russia and the US will coordinate their bombing raids in Syria 👍:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-10/us-and-russia-tussle-over-syria-deal-as-regime-strikes/7832890
I don't believe this was an accident and this is more proof of the US aiding IS. Has the US already blamed Assad or Putin for this "mistake"?...And the US-led coalition has just bombed the SAA, killing 62.
Great coordination.
https://www.rt.com/news/359678-us-strikes-syrian-army/
The same way US "Aiding" Al Qaeda. But this time Russia cones to play too since ISIS consists of both fallen armies and rebels.Why would they aid IS?
Why would they aid IS?
At this point, i felt that ISIS is just sprouting his ludicrous claims.I just read on CNN.com that ISIS is claiming responsibility for the Minnesota mall attack.
Well, Samantha Power blamed Russia and SAA for bombing civilians, markets and hospitals (ha, look who's talking). With no details or evidence, just words.I don't believe this was an accident and this is more proof of the US aiding IS. Has the US already blamed Assad or Putin for this "mistake"?
I'm sorry, but there aren't enough facepalms to express how ridiculous this is. Your theory is that the United States knowingly and willingly took military action designed and wholly intended to benefit the single most dangerous terrorist organisation for the sake of undermining the Assad regime and (figuratively speaking) stick their tongue out at Syria's allies in general and Russia in particular?Maybe it's the "Assad must go" mentality and they don't care who they aid to achieve that goal? the end goal is to weaken (destroy) Syria.
It would appear the US State Department and the US Pentagon are working towards different ends. Kerry pushes a huge stone uphill and makes a peace agreement, then the Pentagon shoots up a Syrian government position, killing scores, all the while Samantha Power smirks about it. Regime change for fun and profit, originally a British game, but perfected by us.I'm sorry, but there aren't enough facepalms to express how ridiculous this is. Your theory is that the United States knowingly and willingly took military action designed and wholly intended to benefit the single most dangerous terrorist organisation for the sake of undermining the Assad regime and (figuratively speaking) stick their tongue out at Syria's allies in general and Russia in particular?
Except that the position that they shot up was of pretty low strategic value. Another gargantuan effort by Field Marshall Haig to move his drinks cabinet six inches closer to Berlin?Kerry pushes a huge stone uphill and makes a peace agreement, then the Pentagon shoots up a Syrian government position, killing scores, all the while Samantha Power smirks about it.
Lord, indeed. The British have a weird way of commemorating military incompetence. Let's not forget Tennyson's "The Charge of the Light Brigade", an ode to one of the most unnecessary and avoidable disasters in one of the most futile wars of human history, executed by a man who bought his commission in the military and retired to his quarters for a steak and champagne dinner hours after the slaughter.Field Marshal Lord Haig
Butcher of the Somme, author of 2 million British casualties, synonymous with the futility of war, and fully in the tradition of Sisyphus.