Time Trial #73

  • Thread starter sportacus
  • 519 comments
  • 41,846 views
The cheaters on the leaderboard have been deleted, Amo is number one now and Doodle coming in second with Rajman on third.

This will be a great TT.

Thank´s to you, this is a great TT:tup:👍👍

We will elect RIDOX for GTP member of the month:gtpflag:
 
Hi all, i'm new on this forum.
My name is julian, i have to ask some help with lamborghini miura, i can't have 400 pp, but only 407 with 200kg ballast and engine to 50%.
What i have to do to get 400PP? can you help me please? thanks and have a good day.
Julian.
 
Hi all, i'm new on this forum.
My name is julian, i have to ask some help with lamborghini miura, i can't have 400 pp, but only 407 with 200kg ballast and engine to 50%.
What i have to do to get 400PP? can you help me please? thanks and have a good day.
Julian.

Miura has to have done over 14000km to get it down 400pp and do not change the oil on the car

I can have the car on share if you like
 
Good improvement this morning to a 1:34:570 for 83rd using doodles tune with JohnnyPenso's LSD. Thanks both for sharing. Also sent fr to Ridox to try the car with chassis reinforcement.
 
Last edited:
Miura has to have done over 14000km to get it down 400pp and do not change the oil on the car

I can have the car on share if you like


thank you m8. can i send you a fr later? and what's your psn? mine is Julian_Ross100, i haven't friends coz i've put fast internet just now to my home. i have to send some fr. if someone can help me with fr is much appreciated.

good day to all. Julian
 
Good improvement this morning to a 1:34:570 for 83rd using doodles tune with JohnnyPenso's LSD. Thanks both for sharing. Also sent fr to Ridox to try the car with chassis reinforcement.

You have been added :) Any feedback on the base tune of the shared Miura would be greatly appreciated :cheers:

Thank´s to you, this is a great TT:tup:👍👍

We will elect RIDOX for GTP member of the month:gtpflag:

There's no need to elect me :) There are many others deserves more than me, and I never have such intention anyway 👍
 
Last edited:
thank you m8. can i send you a fr later? and what's your psn? mine is Julian_Ross100, i haven't friends coz i've put fast internet just now to my home. i have to send some fr. if someone can help me with fr is much appreciated.

good day to all. Julian

fordlaser777
 
I'd say what I'm using now is at most 2-3 tenths quicker than the one I posted here, which was based on you0099's car. Remember that I'm not the best of tuners out there. :lol:

The setup is different for sure. TC-Touni95 (who is like the head of the team) actually released a version 2 of the setup we've been using (The one I got a .3 with yesterday), and it was definitely an improvement. At least a tenth quicker.

Otherwise, Amo has just nipped me by a few hundredths, with a .221. 👍

Where is the setup released?
 
Doodles, and others, tunes are posted a few pages back.
Just keep looking back until you find it.

I've been testing the setup Doodles shared but it was very hard to keep laping around 1:34.4, the car it's very unstable in low breaking and has some sort of an unusual over-steer. Most probably it's due to the fact that I have to use a DS3 and the setup it's made for a wheel.
I am not good with tuning but that tune it's in the direction I thought it's ok, high ride height, soft springs, fast dumpers and low LSD, but I now start to think that the secret is in toe and camber angle.... Another thing here I think is brake balance and don't start with style because the good brake balance for this time trial it must be only one, with very small variations.
 
Added, both Miura are on share, both have my base tune. Mustard Yellow has no chassis reinforcement, Mariner Blue has chassis reinforcement.

The tune - complete with gearing :


Ballast : 191 kg
Position : -10 ( yes, it's at the front ) - with chassis reinforcement move the position to -4 to have the car rotate easier and front steering a little more responsive.
Weight Distribution : 47/53 ; 46/54 with -4 position.
Weight : 1171 kg
Use 40/60 weight distribution if prefer rear heavy car :)

LSD :
Initial : 9
Accel : 18
Brake : 9

Power level adjust to max 400PP.

Suspension F/R :

Ride height : -20 -20
Spring : 14.5 15.5
Extension : 4 8
Compress : 2 4
ARB : 4 3
camber : 2.1 1.8
Toe : -0.08 0.16

Transmission :

Reset to default.
Move final 3.900
Move top speed slider to minimum/left most.

set each gearing :

1st 3.900

2nd 2.600

3rd 2.000

4th 1.535

5th 1.250

then move final to 4.000, top speed on the graph should shows 203km/h or 126mph.

The gearing was done with 1st GTAuto Wheel - left most. Different wheel may produce different result.

Happy Tuning and Driving :cheers:

I've been testing the setup Doodles shared but it was very hard to keep laping around 1:34.4, the car it's very unstable in low breaking and has some sort of an unusual over-steer. Most probably it's due to the fact that I have to use a DS3 and the setup it's made for a wheel.
I am not good with tuning but that tune it's in the direction I thought it's ok, high ride height, soft springs, fast dumpers and low LSD, but I now start to think that the secret is in toe and camber angle.... Another thing here I think is brake balance and don't start with style because the good brake balance for this time trial it must be only one, with very small variations.

Have you tried my tune on the shared cars ? They are both made using stick controller :) With ABS 1, I would recommend a bit of rear bias brake balance. something like 4/5, 4/6 or 5/7. I also used steering sensitivity at 2. It's pretty stable for me, move the ballast to the back if you feel rear is not loose enough.
 
Your set it's on schedule for test today. I will return with some feedback if you are interested :)
Thank you again! :sly:
 
No, why would it change :sly:

The maintenance thread had a dicussion on some cars PP values increasing following the update, I was thinking the update may have adjusted some settings/calculations. I am not at home, so I could not check.
 
The maintenance thread had a dicussion on some cars PP values increasing following the update, I was thinking the update may have adjusted some settings/calculations. I am not at home, so I could not check.

I already checked the car after 2.15 , drove the one on my main account, still the same 400PP.
 
Let me know how the tune drives with the chassis reinforcement as I haven't got the chance to drive it with chassis reinforcement installed.

Much more stable, I was able to improve about three tenths to 1:33.475


Given the things I have heard in online lobbies, I can only imagine what it's like for you:eek::banghead:

Yes Sir I have heard just about everything and been called just about everything. I have a pretty good top 10 list of the most commom things I hear. I do have a friends list full of people that I truly enjoy racing with and they more than make up for the less evolved ones.
 
Ridox, thanks for all the help. You've been very unsefish & helpful! 👍 I have 4 Miuras & not one of them has over 1000km on it, so yeah, you've helped a lot! :lol:
 
That's me done for the day. Improved a little bit from1.35.493 this morning to
1.35.098 at close of play today.
Hope to go further tomorrow.
stewy:tup:
 
Miura has to have done over 14000km to get it down 400pp and do not change the oil on the car

I can have the car on share if you like

By comparison, I picked up a new Miura, didn't change the oil (as I had on my others....grrrrr) then started running endurance races on Sunday night. Tuesday now, it has about 3700 miles on it and the PP is down to 405 (with full ballast and 50% engine power). I figure it will be down to 400 later today or tomorrow morning. It's dropping a lot faster now than when it was new. That's miles not kliks. The Indy 500 is probably faster than the Ring or Monza but you have to restart every few hours. Rock stock it's running 59 second laps, too. Love that car.
 
I was working on a Miura before, during, and after the update: no change at all. Also checked other cars - no change.

The big change to be noticed was the TT#73 Time Log. Playing field was levelled so we can now really test man and machine against track.

Remember - this is not a race against opponents - it's a race against time. There are no obstacles but what the track offers, and what the car balks at. To get any kind of honest data towards analyzing how good a line could be taken in a specific car with a regulated PP means we have to have a level playing field. It was a good change.

Nothing against hybrids - it was hybrids that mutated progress of any kind - and they should have a place in the game - but not as an uncontrolled item that can be forced into play when valuable data is to be gathered. Hybrids are fun, creative, and there is a lot of engineering know-how that can be put into it. Because one or two people misuse hybrids, doesn't mean all who are involved with hybrids are bad - they are pioneers on the cutting edge of a whole different horizon.
No doubt PD appreciates the unofficial 'beta-testing'. ;)

But abuse of regulations concerning testing when it comes to time-trialing is anothing thing altogether. That turns the game into tom-foolery.
Playing simulator can be fun when it is taken seriously.

Thanks to all the jockeys here who are doing a stupendous job hunting down fractions of a second to improve - and kudos to all you members who have a sense of team spirit when it comes to helping each other be the best you can be.

Now, let's go on making time with that Miura.. . .

:cheers:
 
"Thanks to all the jockeys here who are doing a stupendous job hunting down fractions of a second to improve - and kudos to all you members who have a sense of team spirit when it comes to helping each other be the best you can be."

Now, let's go on making time with that Miura.. . .

:gtpflag: That´s why I love GTPLANET
 

Latest Posts

Back