- 457
- Singapore
And with that F50, Ferrari hypercar family is complete.
They are the tracks that get the votes. Not everyone would like them fair enough but did anyone ask for extra Tokyo routes?
But dosen't PS+ make for every game? anyway this hole argument is pointless to put it gently ... unlike EA etc in GTS's case there is no battle to be fought "you" don't like microtransactions ? ok very good just turn them off and invest time in the game (since that is the resson "you" bought the thing to begin with.). If someone is a sucker , lazy etc and wants to buy the latest cars instandly with cash let him be is non of our business what i find a bit hypocritical is how Lord of tranz dosen't critisize the other games that do the exact reverse thing "oh you like 1 car of our new pack well that sucks you must pay for all 5" 💡 ahhh i get it! its because they named it DLC! smh...Micro Transactions in GTS case is the weakest greed version there is, if it was a "panic move" then it would be something else. And we have another thread where there is speculation on the economics of the game. PS+ being the most obvious suspect for making PD money.
Because PD already showed that they have no clue how to properly translate classic muscle cars performance to their games...Challenger R/T and Mustang Mach 1 both being limited to 110 mph because of the ridiculously short 4th gear ratio is beyond ridiculous.
We know PD is working on something big
We know nothing, but I hope you are right.Here is an idea. We know PD is working on something big. They also have been focusing on road cars, which would be necessary to model before making Gr3&4 versions of said cars. The updates are 7-9 cars a month, even though they now have outsourced help with car models. There are other reasons why the updates may have been smaller/skipped months but...
What if PD were making 3-5 Gr3/4 cars a month but holding them back for next year when they launch the second year of FIA championships?
Will they really just use the same cars we spent thousands of miles in for another year?
Just an idea. I have nothing other than the idea PD are holding something back, and working on something big. Could be anything!
Here is an idea. We know PD is working on something big. They also have been focusing on road cars, which would be necessary to model before making Gr3&4 versions of said cars. The updates are 7-9 cars a month, even though they now have outsourced help with car models. There are other reasons why the updates may have been smaller/skipped months but...
What if PD were making 3-5 Gr3/4 cars a month but holding them back for next year when they launch the second year of FIA championships?
Will they really just use the same cars we spent thousands of miles in for another year?
Just an idea. I have nothing other than the idea PD are holding something back, and working on something big. Could be anything!
That "ridiculously short" gear ratio, in other words a 1:1 fourth gear combined to a 3.54:1 or a 3.89:1 final drive, is perfectly in line with what the muscle cars actually were equipped with. There were even shorter ratios available, for example a common "Drag Pak" option in the Mustang was a 4.11:1 final drive.
It's not exactly PD's fault to replicate cars that were optimized to run the quarter mile as quickly as possible and the only one having no clue about classic muscle car performance here is, unfortunately, you.
Those numbers don't make sense. Given the final drive on both cars, The Mustang should have the higher top speed. In addition, on the Mustang's speed, it says Theoritical top speed without speed governor. Suggesting the car wouldn't reach that speed in stock trim.1971 Dodge Challenger R/T top speed: 139 Mph/240Km/H
Source: https://www.supercars.net/blog/1970-dodge-challenger-rt/
Submitted by the owner of one, includes the same specs that the car in the game has.
1971 Ford Mustang Mach 1 topped speed: 131 Mph/210 Km/H
Source: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1971/838550/ford_mustang_mach_i_351_4v_v-8_4-speed.html
Again, same specs as the car represented on GTS.
But are credible sources of automotive data, but If I am the one who doesn't know anything here, then neither are these sources. And clearly you are the one who knows everything about these cars.
So tell me, are the cars accurately represented in the game then? What do you think of the rev limiters that they constantly bounce on any straight line long than a 1/4 mile? Have they rolled out of factory like in the real life?
Do we know that?
Source ?There have been a couple of comments on this forum from people who were at the live finals and have heard or seen something but are bound to secrecy. Basically PD have something planned, and are very busy. And that is as far as the rumblings go. It could be literally anything, but I'm hoping for a raft of new cars for FIA racing.
There have been a couple of comments on this forum from people who were at the live finals and have heard or seen something but are bound to secrecy. Basically PD have something planned, and are very busy. And that is as far as the rumblings go. It could be literally anything, but I'm hoping for a raft of new cars for FIA racing.
Greed is greed, and I agree with regard to plus too. But it's only needed for the broken part and I have it for other games, including TLoU, also Sony IIRC.Micro Transactions in GTS case is the weakest greed version there is, if it was a "panic move" then it would be something else. And we have another thread where there is speculation on the economics of the game. PS+ being the most obvious suspect for making PD money.
I complain about other games with these practices in the appropriate place.But dosen't PS+ make for every game? anyway this hole argument is pointless to put it gently ... unlike EA etc in GTS's case there is no battle to be fought "you" don't like microtransactions ? ok very good just turn them off and invest time in the game (since that is the resson "you" bought the thing to begin with.). If someone is a sucker , lazy etc and wants to buy the latest cars instandly with cash let him be is non of our business what i find a bit hypocritical is how Lord of tranz dosen't critisize the other games that do the exact reverse thing "oh you like 1 car of our new pack well that sucks you must pay for all 5" 💡 ahhh i get it! its because they named it DLC! smh...
Those numbers don't make sense.
Here is an idea. We know PD is working on something big. They also have been focusing on road cars, which would be necessary to model before making Gr3&4 versions of said cars. The updates are 7-9 cars a month, even though they now have outsourced help with car models. There are other reasons why the updates may have been smaller/skipped months but...
What if PD were making 3-5 Gr3/4 cars a month but holding them back for next year when they launch the second year of FIA championships?
Will they really just use the same cars we spent thousands of miles in for another year?
Just an idea. I have nothing other than the idea PD are holding something back, and working on something big. Could be anything!
Maybe Kaz will tweet another picture on Saturday (1st December) for the next update?
Or Gran Turismo will publish a tweet per day, to tease us about some future content like we're opening a case of an Advent Calendar?
Maybe I'm dreaming too much
That sounds a little too close to PD engaging with the community.Maybe Kaz will tweet another picture on Saturday (1st December) for the next update?
Or Gran Turismo will publish a tweet per day, to tease us about some future content like we're opening a case of an Advent Calendar?
Maybe I'm dreaming too much
Source ?
but finding the actual posts is like a needle in a haystack. That one took me 15 minutes and wasn't the one about them being very busy with something. Of course, there is also the FIA approved GT License stuff that they want to do. There are a lot of possibilities.PD has enough on its plate right now, trust me guys.
But dosen't PS+ make for every game? anyway this hole argument is pointless to put it gently ... unlike EA etc in GTS's case there is no battle to be fought "you" don't like microtransactions ? ok very good just turn them off and invest time in the game (since that is the resson "you" bought the thing to begin with.). If someone is a sucker , lazy etc and wants to buy the latest cars instandly with cash let him be is non of our business what i find a bit hypocritical is how Lord of tranz dosen't critisize the other games that do the exact reverse thing "oh you like 1 car of our new pack well that sucks you must pay for all 5" 💡 ahhh i get it! its because they named it DLC! smh...
Greed is greed, and I agree with regard to plus too. But it's only needed for the broken part and I have it for other games, including TLoU, also Sony IIRC.
It's gaming today. 'We' allow it too much.
There have been a couple of comments on this forum from people who were at the live finals and have heard or seen something but are bound to secrecy. Basically PD have something planned, and are very busy. And that is as far as the rumblings go. It could be literally anything, but I'm hoping for a raft of new cars for FIA racing.
You will probably be looking forever as these people were part of the events that took place and certainly not ruin their reputation or chances of participating into other events by leaking out planned updates or contents for next year or whatever it is that they know about.People have been making hints like this but finding the actual posts is like a needle in a haystack. That one took me 15 minutes and wasn't the one about them being very busy with something. Of course, there is also the FIA approved GT License stuff that they want to do. There are a lot of possibilities.