- 9,972
- Denmark
I'm sure many are happy to see another Nissan Z, including myself.
Update 1.32 (January Update) speculation thread - update released!
- Thread starter Envoxeb
- 1,675 comments
- 286,916 views
- Status
I'm sure many are happy to see another Nissan Z, including myself.
TonyJZX
(Banned)
- 3,945
- Australia
If you go to the thread where people were discussing their age and generation you'll find that there seems to be a gap with younger folks so its no surprise to me that perhaps the younger folks have no tie in or feeling for the older cars.
Hell when I was working in schools technical colleges and universities many kids had no idea about 20th century history so you can be certain that the younger folks dont care for 300zx's or E-Types or 1950's Aston Martins.
Forza gets around that by having 700 odd cars and yet still each DLC has big complaints.
So here if GT Sport releases a DLC that is centered around older cars then yeah... it'll be alien to young folks.
If its not S14s or Ken Block nonsense or whatever they aspire to now then this is what you get.
Hell when I was working in schools technical colleges and universities many kids had no idea about 20th century history so you can be certain that the younger folks dont care for 300zx's or E-Types or 1950's Aston Martins.
Forza gets around that by having 700 odd cars and yet still each DLC has big complaints.
So here if GT Sport releases a DLC that is centered around older cars then yeah... it'll be alien to young folks.
If its not S14s or Ken Block nonsense or whatever they aspire to now then this is what you get.
- 87,647
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
That doesn't make anything worse. It just, according to your point of view, doesn't make it any better...
You may be surprised to learn that some people like the "old history cars" and get more enjoyment from them than the one-layout-fits-all identi-race car clones. I'd rather drive the Porsche 356 than the Porsche 919, that's for sure.
: 
- 1,355
- United Kingdom
- 342
- Poland
More than the cars selection what is worring me is that the game doesn't get any new features via updates like 360 degree camera rotation inside and around the cars or even one new camera view like before the last update people thought we will get new interior camera without the wheel but it was not true. We doesnt't get anything new aside from the cars and tracks.
- 3,712
- São Paulo
- Philip-Giger
- 1,104
- Japan
- PettyWingman
I saw that a certain guy estimated that we'll have the CIVIC TYPE R EK9 as the next Honda vehicle.
Now we have BEAT, NSX-R NA1, and INTEGRA TYPE R DC2 (Soon).
You know, they're in order of release year.
Now we have BEAT, NSX-R NA1, and INTEGRA TYPE R DC2 (Soon).
You know, they're in order of release year.
- 588
- Earth
- Dstinct_Marti
Old history cars is the fun for some
Because others (me too) want race cars, exotics, super/hyper cars to have fun, doesn't mean that classics are not fun though.
I may not be interested in buying them, but if I get one of them from a daily marathon I will go in a Lobby and take advantage of their low grip.
- 30,021
- Cuddington, Cheshire
- JDA1982
I'm almost 100% certain it's the Aston Martin DBS3 and I am 100% certain that it's definitely not the Eagle Speedster.
The windscreen is the wrong angle, the bonnet is the wrong shape, isn't long enough and doesn't have the bulge in it that the Eagle's has, the nose is also the wrong shape and the rear looks like it has the more pronounced arch just behind the cockpit that the DBS3 has.
- 4,471
- Arkhangelsk
- ray29rus
No new Supra in this update is really strange. PD followed Supra's production since the beginning, with FT1, FT1 VGT and Supra Racing Concept. Something similar happened with GT 86 and we got a trailer on the reveal day and the car itself in the next GT5 update couple of weeks later. I think new Supra will be in this update, and we'll get a trailer on January, 14.
Still strange that there's no silhouette, since these don't really reveal anything, and photos were leaked anyway. But maybe PD and/or Toyota just want to make a surprise.
Still strange that there's no silhouette, since these don't really reveal anything, and photos were leaked anyway. But maybe PD and/or Toyota just want to make a surprise.
- 2,054
- Sweden
I bet their will be a new track, maybe spa, deep Forest or silverstone.
Its will be a great update. Bringing back tvr is a brand is a huge deal, that does mean we can get the speed 12 at some point,
Bringing the integra type r dc2 back is a good thing as we never had it in premium form before. glad the did go for the Honda version.
Its will be a great update. Bringing back tvr is a brand is a huge deal, that does mean we can get the speed 12 at some point,
Bringing the integra type r dc2 back is a good thing as we never had it in premium form before. glad the did go for the Honda version.
Last edited by a moderator:
- 1,167
- Paradera
- SDSPOWER01
I am pretty sure Toyota does not want it's car to be revealed ahead of time and that may be the only reason I can think off of why there is no new Supra.
I saw many people predicting the new Supra but tbh I never saw it coming this month because the reveal was 14th of January, seeing the update was on 17th made me a little surprised and that the Supra might have been in but at the same time not.
- 276
- Bonn
But it’s not what people do! Out of 100 posters 90 wish.
And now that we pretty much know the cars they speculate on the price tag *smh
You can emphazise and post your rules a million times, Famine, and won’t get through. It’s 2019 and there’s that „PD owes me my favorite car“ attitude. Fake „news“ will beat informed speculation everytime. Because real life is just too much of a burden, and this is the virtual world where „I want it my way“. Since you don’t regulate the wishlist stuff, it will keep coming.
Also, I started an an Update 1.33 speculation thread. Basically a cynical action on my part, but hey, there obviously is a demand *shrug And now it‘s closed which I think is undue censorship, as the post doesn’t violate a community rule, or does it?
Last edited:
- 1,167
- Paradera
- SDSPOWER01
His point was: If you have the words, "I wish", "I want" or "I would like" it will not be considered as a speculation.
I can speculate and say I think this or these cars might come in the next update and I did not wish for them or suggested for them (even though I have hidden wishes for them to appear) it's really that simple.
The choice of words is what makes the difference.
I speculated the Silvia to re-appear in the last update and the reason was they are iconic cars and realisticly they were premium models in GT6 which always have high chances of coming back to the game.
- 87,647
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
These posts are deleted and the users directed to the Suggestions forum.
These posts are deleted and the users directed to the Suggestions forum.
- 276
- Bonn
Then the good „Cars we had in GT6 and we still need in GTS“ should be enough for all. No further speculation needed.
- 1,167
- Paradera
- SDSPOWER01
That is just too Global that is why people specify which cars they predict or speculate in these updates.
I can also say I predict cars in Forza to appear soon in GTS but I would leave so many people with question marks.
- 276
- Bonn
Ok, then my standard of „informed speculation“ is a bit higher, obviously.
My point was: Look at this (or all the other) update (s): There‘s no way of actually telling what will come. No approach however „logical“ gets it right. It‘s almost random. Maybe based on the „what cars we had in former versions of the game“ list. But even that falls short.
- 87,647
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
That's why it's called speculation - reasoning based on evidence - and not "post what you know".
Some people do post speculation that is almost random, speculating on cars and brands never seen before in the Gran Turismo series with no clear evidence that this will happen. This is then discussed on this discussion forum. Others post speculation that is less random, speculating based on the content of updates thus far. That too is then discussed on this discussion forum. This is how it works.
Wishes go in the Suggestions forum. Reasoning based on evidence goes in the speculation thread. It feels like I've said all of this before...
- 30,021
- Cuddington, Cheshire
- JDA1982
There is a distinct difference between me reasoning that we may get the Alfa Romeo 155Ti on the basis it has been in Gran Turismo before and there is existing speculation that it has recently been re-scanned by PD than just thinking I hope to god the new TVR Griffith is added because I love TVR's.
Last edited:
- 3,177
- St helens, merseyside, England.
- crazybuttocks198
- Crazybuttocks19
- 276
- Bonn
„Random“ meant the cars and tracks we see in the updates.
I could post 10 random cars from my neighborhood (yes, there are a lot of GT worthy cars in my neighborhood...) and be just as close to the actual update as most any informed speculation.
But anyway... There’s a lot of things I‘ll never understand when it comes to people and GT Sport, like „collecting cars“ or „doing liveries“... And the strange obsession with old versions of the game and the cars available there. But each his own, I guess.
- 276
- Bonn
Problem is that such rule is a whole Gran Turismo Subforum rule. So that means you should add that title on alot of threads which is not ideal at all.
@Famine I can see why lots of people get confused searching for the GT Suggestions section. It has a redirect on Gran Turismo 6 subforum but nowhere to be found on Gran Turismo Sport subforum. Yes it can be accessed directly on the main Gran Turismo sub but lots of people wouldn't really notice especially when its only titled "Suggestions". Maybe if the "GT Suggestions" redirect is put on the GTSport section like in GT6 section than people would notice.
Just my 2 cents.
- Status
Similar threads
