Is there room for me in this tonight? It looks well organised
Wow, you must have loads of interest to turn people away?!
I'm in. Add me on PSN I'm tacom08
JawehawkAllow me to copy/paste what I just told Flimbo.
"I'm sorry, but it's too late to join this particular VS event. You'll have to wait until the Gallardo VS F430 races have ended. You can sign up for the next VS event, once I've decided on our next rival cars.
Hope to see you in the next VS series. "
Just to reiterate your point. Let me give an example. Back when that championship went down to Mattie Vs Me in a shoot off race. We both had two firsts and a second each. The first race Mattie came 3rd, with MSTER coming between us. MSTER missed the middle two races. He then came back into the Nurburgring race and came second again. Splitting me and Mattie again. Had MSTER not been in the first race then Mattie would have won clean. Had he not been in the last race I would have won clean. Long story short even without realising you can change the outcome of the whole tournament
So can I still race today? BTW you can just ignore that guys position so lets says I win, you can instead give whoever comes second the amount of points for winning. Then I wouldn't influence the points battle.
Oh no!! I just realised. If we ignore ADR's results then the Lamborghini has won 2 races.
Anyway Well Done ADR and also Jawehawk 👍
This was a fun race, with lots of up and downs though. The start went good, but got overtaken a lot by people drafting in the straights in the first lap. I don't know which lap it exactly was, but i passed Andy and Jik who seemed to be crashed. Then disaster strikes, the 🤬 lag came back.
*SNIP*
With 6 laps to go i pitted and accepted my 5th place. In last lap however i passed MSTER and Jik, both were running low on fuel. At that time i was driving with one red stripe left too, but it was enough to reach the finish line.
Congrats to Andy and ADR, well done!
You lucky 🤬 !
Mine went red literally as I passed you. Lucky to get past Jik me thinks
Sadly, Lapi has had to withdraw from the race, as he weren't able to join us yesterday, nor will he be able to join us in the next race.
On another note. My original plan on how to declare the winning car, was simply to look at the car that the winning driver was using. However, I see you have taken a different approach with the spreadsheet, MSTER. In fact, I rather like the approach. Though there is 1 problem with it. It relies on an equal number of each car.
If cars drop out in the race, that's fair game, as it will just be written as a failure to complete. However, if we only had 3 Gallardo's VS 5 F430's before the VS event had started, it would be unfair, as the F430's would have more cars to score points with. This problem is very much evident in our current event, as the only reason the number of F430's have been on an equal level with the Gallardo, have been people getting disconnected.
I could of course balance it out by making sure we had an equal number before the event officially starts. I'd like you all to give your input.
Should the winning car be the car driven by the driver with most points? Or should we declare a winning car from the total number of points aqquired by said car, throughout the different races?
Yes, the spreadsheet will be biased if the number of cars by one manufactuer is greater than the other. But surely there must a way around this problem, right?Sadly, Lapi has had to withdraw from the race, as he weren't able to join us yesterday, nor will he be able to join us in the next race.
On another note. My original plan on how to declare the winning car, was simply to look at the car that the winning driver was using. However, I see you have taken a different approach with the spreadsheet, MSTER. In fact, I rather like the approach. Though there is 1 problem with it. It relies on an equal number of each car.
If cars drop out in the race, that's fair game, as it will just be written as a failure to complete. However, if we only had 3 Gallardo's VS 5 F430's before the VS event had started, it would be unfair, as the F430's would have more cars to score points with. This problem is very much evident in our current event, as the only reason the number of F430's have been on an equal level with the Gallardo, have been people getting disconnected.
I could of course balance it out by making sure we had an equal number before the event officially starts. I'd like you all to give your input.
Should the winning car be the car driven by the driver with most points? Or should we declare a winning car from the total number of points aqquired by said car, throughout the different races?
Actually, averages could remove the biased amount of cars in the race. If the Lamborgini was going to win all three races in a row, then on average it will have a higher score than the Ferrari for example. And having an average points system means that it shouldn't really matter how many cars are taking part or if one manufactuer has more car participating than the other.I don't really see the idea in taking the average score of the different car models, as the different number of cars, will result in a score that says little about the overall performance of the cars in the race.
Only taking the top contestants into account is definately an option.
I'm not sure if that would work or not, because it would mean a lot of complex programming for the spreadsheet.You could equalize it by only counting the cars that finished best, lets say 5 Ferraris and 3 Lambos are in a race, You would only count the top 3 finishing Ferraris, the other 2 Ferraris would not acquire any points for the manufacturer.
The spreadsheet has been updated. A pie chart showing the average scores of the two manufactuers has been added. So far, Lamborgini has 20 points on average, and Ferrari has 10.6 which is not surprising considering the fact that a Lamborgini has crossed the line first in every race in this series.[/COLOR]
I think you made a mistake somewhere. You have calculated the average score of the Gallardo for each race, and then put the two results together. For the F430, however, you only seem to have calculated the average for our last race. Thus the big difference.
Here is the average for each car model thus far.
The first race, the Gallardo's average score is 11, and for the 2nd race, it's 9.66. Put the two numbers together, and we have 20.66.
The F430 has an average score of 11 in the first race too, and 10.33 in the 2nd race. This then results in a total average score of 21.33.
This doesn't seem quite right to me. It doesn't really show the differences in the cars performance. The fact that the averages is the same for both car models in the 1st race, shows that this is not a good way to find the winning car model.
Yeah I like my idea better lol. Anyway hope you make another vs series after this Andy with stock cars, a good time for me would be on Saturday at the moment, but I never know.
I can pretty much guaranty that I will keep hosting these events. I wouldn't have spend 2 hours creating this thread, plus the time it took to plan and test for it, if I didn't intend to use it further. Though my time will be cut down severely as of next month, as my time in the army begins.