- 12,486
- CCS
- GTP_Diego
*Facepalm*
I agree... completely. But the concept of it was at least new and well executed for the genre. Let's face it, most horror movies made after 1980 have all followed the same BS route of psycho killer who's avenging some far-fetched trauma from childhood/previous life... there have been a few exceptions, but they haven't been succesful. Saw was succesful, and while having all the plot holes that are typical in horror films, I couldn't help but to think the first one was quite alright.
I'm usually very patient with horror movies... I generally don't get scared at them and don't get grossed out easily (except for that 2 girls 1 cup bit ) but I can determine that scary parts, and to be honest Saw IV didn't have these... not in the way the original Saw did, and none of the sequels carried. There was no suspense in it... if pressed, I'd even give the movie a 4... for Saw 4... get it? Ahh nevermind.
Granted, the sequels were complete crap... the gimmick of Saw were the gadgets and the whole "cherish your life" slogan. Putting myself in the mindset of considering the first one not that bad, I'd have to say the 4th one was the best they could do. Or rather, it could've been so much worse... it could've been like II and III Would I recommend it? Probably not. Would I see yet another sequel? Absolutely not... unless it was free. And I sure as hell don't want to see it again.