Wow is that so!
Hmmm I don't like the sound of that,subscription this subscription that ugh no no no.
Xbox 1 what a strange name,not the actual 1 thing just why use it now?PS1,PS2,etc makes sense but xbox 1!
.
Say what now?
Will have to wait for official technical specs but going by power figures (100W 40nm AMD Jaguar based 8-core CPU/GPU), the leaks seem accurate about hardware performance. Given that PS4 GPU is most likely over 50% faster than the Xbox One and also having a lot more memory bandwidth and both consoles most likely targeting 1080p, one can assume there will be a noticable difference in games that are multi-platform whether if double FPS or being visually more impressive. Sony best first party studios are quite impressive when it comes to graphics so them having also a huge hardware advantage should be quite telling. The Wow effect should be very prevalent on PS4 compared to the Xbox One.Do you have something other than your own wild opinion to back that up?
Will have to wait for official technical specs but going by power figures (100W 40nm AMD Jaguar based 8-core CPU/GPU), the leaks seem accurate about hardware performance. Given that PS4 GPU is most likely over 50% faster than the Xbox One and also having a lot more memory bandwidth and both consoles most likely targeting 1080p, one can assume there will be a noticable difference in games that are multi-platform whether if double FPS or being visually more impressive. Sony best first party studios are quite impressive when it comes to graphics so them having also a huge hardware advantage should be quite telling. The Wow effect should be very prevalent on PS4 compared to the Xbox One.
Well unless Microsoft have some secret to make things much more powerful without using their cloud serivce, then I think it is quite possible to be that big difference for majority of the games. Anyway if Microsoft does have a secret that Sony doesn't know about using GPU and CPU from same manufacturer then it will be quite impressive that with much less memory bandwidth and GPU power (As leaked) to be able to compete at same resolutions and frame rate while using an older manufacturing processing node and most likely also taking less power. Goes against all logic really.So just your speculation then.
DaveTheStalkerContracts are negotiable.
Put on your "They Live" sunglasses and join us in Realville.
I wonder how long it will take M$ to pull the plug on 360 online use like they did Xbox1?
Are you insinuating they did that quickly? Because it was 2010, five years into 360 life. Seems reasonable to me. I don't expect PS3 online gaming still active beyond 2018.
On another note I find it hard to take anyone that refers to them as M$ seriously.
Most likelyConsidering that all games must be installed in order to play them and that there will be an 'activation fee' in second hand games (or lending them to a friend, going to a friend's house, etc.), doesn't that necessarily mean that in order to play/install games there will be an online check of a first install, therefore 'always online' is a must for the most important part of the console?
So basically they simply tried to find a backdoor to say it doesn't need always online, because it only needs to be once per day online.It needs to be connected when you activate the game to use the code; and you need to connect to the internet once per day or it stops working entirely.
Nope.
You bought a license to use it. That license extends exactly as far as it says in the EULA, and not one step farther. Like it or not, you agreed to it when you bought it.
.
NopeNo composite cables?
Nope
Video: HDMICrap...time to ditch my SDTV...
Can anybody tell me what the 2nd/3rd from the right is?
Good possible, thx.3rd from the right is the Kinect connector, I'm betting.