I remember back when all the best cars were aluminum, some even with the driver's feet ahead of the front axle line, and they came apart like cracker boxes even going 30 mph slower.I'm saying if it weren't for all of these.
I'm saying if it weren't for all of these.
I remember back when all the best cars were aluminum, some even with the driver's feet ahead of the front axle line, and they came apart like cracker boxes even going 30 mph slower.
Gordon Smiley's car had his feet ahead of the front axle. But that was 1982.I know what you're saying, and I just said, you could eliminate some of this from the equation and I'm sure he'd still be alive. Saying if one of these weren't apart of the situation he would have died, seems too absolutist really, when many drivers by what you've just said should have died over the years because they weren't in the DW12 or didn't have a HANS device.
Safety has been a culmination of many decades hard work, I think it's great he is okay without injury, but I'm not surprised. I guess is the simple way to put my reaction to your post.
Cars for years have been designed to do this rather than being a fixed structure, one because of quickly fixing damaged pieces and two because of safety. It's easier for pieces to absorb and break apart dissipating kinetic energy than it is have it essentially oscillate and carry through to the driver full on.
What cars had a driver's feet ahead of the front axle?
Gordon Smiley's car had his feet ahead of the front axle. But that was 1982.
The cars with the shorter noses usually had the driver's feet either above the axle housing or in front of it varying on driver height. That came to a stop by the 90's but it shows how insane Indianapolis used to be.That's insane, I never knew they did that, thanks for the info.
He's not without injury...Safety has been a culmination of many decades hard work, I think it's great he is okay without injury, but I'm not surprised. I guess is the simple way to put my reaction to your post.
Indycars seem to be more forgiving of seasoned drivers...though that's compared to F1 where a career can be over before the age of 25 just because they aren't appealing to anyone.Glad to hear it's nothing terribly serious for Bourdais (i.e. no brain/spine, etc. injuries). Is this the end of his racing career though? Probably a decent amount of recovery time, and he's up there in age. Maybe done with Indy but will continue to race in sportscars and the occasional LeMans? Or will be come back and jump right into a seat?
Bourdais is my favourite driver currently in Indy...really hated to see that collision.
He's not without injury...
So how can I satisfy you since you're bothered by my post? That he would've survived regardless of any of the things I listed?
I'm very sure that he would have had the final say so probably would admit that it was too aggressive due to the incident. However, he was also running the left side winglet.I think Seb is going to be sick about this whole deal. They probably trimmed out too much and didnt really need to and he will also miss his home race the 24hr of Le Mans now because of that.
Ok, I'm changing my view to it's excellent that he survived and for safety in general. There? Happy now? No longer "disturbed" by my opinion? This is my view from now on.Yes but no where did I say I expected him not to be injured. Small confines and tons of energy hitting a wall, something is bound to break or get injured on a person. I was more disturbed by you easily thinking death without such items.
Regardless of any? Also didn't state that, I'm trying to stress that safety has been growing for some time, and to think that all of the things you listed are necessary for survival and without, death would occur. Seems to be neglecting how safe the IR-03/05 was. That's not to say the DW12 isn't a necessary improvement after the tragic loss of Dan Wheldon, but it was obviously on it's way despite that loss.
It looked like he had a moment in turn 3 lap 2 and the car looked like it bottomed out on either lap 2 or into 1 on lap 3, I dont remember which. I already deleted the session from my DVR so I cant go back and look at it again.I'm very sure that he would have had the final say so probably would admit that it was too aggressive due to the incident. However, he was also running the left side winglet.
I think it was T3 Lap 2. I was surprised nobody had an incident where they bottomed throughout that session.It looked like he had a moment in turn 3 lap 2 and the car looked like it bottomed out on either lap 2 or into 1 on lap 3, I dont remember which. I already deleted the session from my DVR so I cant go back and look at it again.
Ok, I'm changing my view to it's excellent that he survived and for safety in general. There? Happy now? No longer "disturbed" by my opinion? This is my view from now on.
I think it was T3 Lap 2. I was surprised nobody had an incident where they bottomed throughout that session.
This was definitely one of the bigger single car crashes I've seen. I just can't get over how fast he went, essentially head on, into the wall. Definitely a scary moment. Hoping he can make a quick and full recovery from his injuries.
What scared me was that he got loose, corrected, and then the rears caught...but the fronts never looked to turn left again after that. I know they don't turn much at speed, but it didn't look like he was changing direction at all. He went through the center of the skids that were already there.
What cars had a driver's feet ahead of the front axle?
It reminded me of Senna's fatal crash, but carrying more speed and luckily for Bourdais at a better angle. The wheel could have impacted his head there..This was definitely one of the bigger single car crashes I've seen. I just can't get over how fast he went, essentially head on, into the wall. Definitely a scary moment. Hoping he can make a quick and full recovery from his injuries.
That rule was introduced for the 1988 season. Jacques Lafitte's crash at Brands in 1986 was the main catalyst for the rule to be brought in.Indy, no idea... but it was normal in F1 until Ralf Schumacher's leg-piercing accident in Monaco iirc. In Kubica's big Montreal crash his feet were visible at the end of the monocoque as the car came to rest, presumably they were past the axle line too.
That rule was introduced for the 1988 season. Jacques Lafitte's crash at Brands in 1986 was the main catalyst for the rule to be brought in.