So when Schumacher wins non stop in his ferrari it is like he has real skill, but when Vettel does the same thing it is lame?
And we don't know how Vettle or anyone else will drive in the wet for that matter.
Why are Vettel fans so sensitive?
Because if it was Lewis or Fernando, people would be lauding their performance. When it's Sebastian, there are too many snidey comments about how it's all in the car, regardless of Webber's form.
May I ask how do you know this? And btw, since when was Lewis or Fernando in such a consistently/dominating car?
Why are Vettel fans so sensitive?
Just because some don't want to see him run off into the distant and turn the race into a procession from turn 1, doesn't mean they "hate" or are "hating" on him.
On another note - Vettel still has a helluva long way to go to reach the greatness of Senna or Schumacher in terms of not only success, but brillant performances in inferior machinery throughout many years (like Alonso almost pulled off last year). Lets be honest, Vettel's had a pretty dominating car in the past two years and should have been the man who won the WDC to begin with..lets reminds ourselves that his teammate is Mark Webber, not a Lewis Hamilton or Fernando Alonso. No doubt he has a ton of potential...but IMO the car is helping to give him far too much credit/hype at the moment.
Anyway, bring on the race!
You only have to watch the race threads on gtp to see how ridiculously biased some people are. Remember Monza 2008. Vettel won in a bad car. Neither Alonso or Hamilton have done this. Vettel's speed is extraordinary.
You only have to watch the race threads on gtp to see how ridiculously biased some people are..
I don't see where you're coming from. He admittedly has a faster car, but it takes a brilliant driver to pull off consistent near perfect laps in almost every race and qualifying. The Torro Rosso could be called an inferior piece of machinery, and Vettel had a win in it. Last year, Alonso did not have an inferior car, he had two pole position starts. It doesn't matter how good his racecraft or skills are, he's not going to get pole in a slow car. It's not that Vettel fans are over sensitive, it's just that you guys pass off his talent as just the car being fast. Alonso or whatever can have the fastest car in the world, but would we really see constant fastest laps every lap?
Who would have thought This is F1 - it's nothing new that there are a lot of followers/fans who are biased, overly fanatical, delusional, or overly full of hatred. Every driver has them...some more than others.
You only have to watch the race threads on gtp to see how ridiculously biased some people are. Remember Monza 2008. Vettel won in a bad car. Neither Alonso or Hamilton have done this. Vettel's speed is extraordinary.
Edit: Are you trying to justify the overly negative attitude towards Vettel as simple gut feelings? Or are you debating his actual level of talent?
.
Hungary 2008- Hamilton won in a dog of a car.
Alonso put his piece of metal on pole.
akmuqSingapore 2008- May of cheated but Alonso still won the race.
akmuqMonza 2008- Vettel won from pole. And the car was so bad his teammate who got less then his rookie teammate the next year was able to qualify 4th. Terrible car.
Overly negative? Please explain.
Mike RotchEdit: F1 Fan. Dont get your knickers in a twist - you are criticising others for putting Vettel down, but you're doing exactly the same to other drivers.
Hamilton is going around track with half of the engine cover off.
Well, some people are so keen to say "it's all the car". What's your opinion on Mark Webber's level of talent... When Webber win's, people don't say "it's all in the car" yet Mark Webber has been Beaten by Vettel across 2 seasons as teammates. Even last year with the lack of reliability. And currently, he's doing the same this season.
EDIT:
No, actually I'm stating the facts. If someone can tell me when Lewis or Fernando have taken a bad car, put it on pole position and won a race, then I'll shutup...
I've already answered to Hungary 2009... I'm just defending against the Vettel haters, who are so uneducated, that they suggest Hamilton won with the same dog of a car that he was running at the back of the field in...
Ok, whatever. Vettel is the greatest driver since Fangio. He could ride a horse around Shanghai, starting in the grandstand and still win, in the rain, with hands tied to his shoes.
Now, back to today's race...
Ok, whatever. Vettel is the greatest driver since Fangio. He could ride a horse around Shanghai, starting in the grandstand and still win, in the rain, with hands tied to his shoes. .
Now, back to today's race...
Have you forgot the point of a forum??? Are people allowed to mindlessly bash Vettel, but I'm not allowed to respond? I realise, this has gone off topic, but if you look through this entire thread, you'll find i'm far from the first. Please tell me mr super moderator. [/sarcasm]
He wasn't stuck in the back of the grid. Heikki was. When Hamilton won that race he still had an inferior car. Also nicely avoided Alonso's pole.You mean 2009. If you think that that car was still a dog, then there isn't much hope for you. It was a dog when Lewis was stuck in the back of the grid. He only won due to the upgrades to the car.
May of??? So many people say "He could of won"... He could have won... This annoys me.
He and Sebastien Bourdais qualified before the rain got heavier. This allowed Vettel to control the race. The fact is, he took the Toro Rosso, outsmarted the others, stuck it on Pole and won the race.
Neither Hamilton or Alonso have done such a feat at such a disadvantage.
The point of a forum is to debate with an open mind - the end.
Now if you want to create another thread on this, you are welcome to, but this thread is about this GP - so from here on, we keep it on topic 👍