http://www.racer.com/imsa-roar-test...na-bop-adjustments--prototypes/article/328755
DP adjustments because they're too fast at Daytona (no surprise)
http://www.racer.com/imsa-roar-test...t-daytona-bop-adjustments--gt/article/328761/
Gt adjustments as well as the pit procedure. Also, the supposed anti-sandbagging rule.
I don't have faith in the HPD. The Nissans should make it. Honestly, I wouldn't mind being the Highway to Help car atm. It's the most proven package in the field honestly. That engine has more Rolex 24 wins than the rest of the engines in the prototype field combined in the race. I think the 01 makes it to victory lane just because they probably won't have to push as hard because they'll have a good setup for the race. The Ford will have the BoP advantage because it's a new and unproven package which in theory means that it won't have to push as hard in order to win. I don't see more than 1 Ford finishing though. I don't see more than 10 P class cars finishing above the GTD winner. Even though I didn't predict it, it would not surprise me at all if a PC car ended up on the overall podium. The banking is what makes Daytona so hard on engines. All the fluids being shifted to one side of the engine and coolant the same way in the radiator. Also, the soft Florida soil can clog up a radiator and have the car overheating within a lap.I don't have much hope for the Skyactiv Diesels or the new Ford engines. Just not enough miles or durability in their present state to last for 24 Hours. If anything, that old BMW V8 in the Highway to help car will outlast those two. However, I am undecided about the Deltawing and LMP cars. Its the first time in 10 years since ACO spec Prototypes have raced here so in that span of time, None of the teams have made these cars (or engines) with a track like Daytona in mind. They could last, they could go kaput.
I would be absolutely surprised if the engines were not tested for many, many hours on an engine dyno before even being considered for racing duty.I don't have much hope for the Skyactiv Diesels or the new Ford engines. Just not enough miles or durability in their present state to last for 24 Hours. If anything, that old BMW V8 in the Highway to help car will outlast those two. However, I am undecided about the Deltawing and LMP cars. Its the first time in 10 years since ACO spec Prototypes have raced here so in that span of time, None of the teams have made these cars (or engines) with a track like Daytona in mind. They could last, they could go kaput.
Let's have some fun predictions here:
Between the Mazda LMP2, Deltawing, and the Ford ecoboost DP
Given there's 2 Mazda LMP, one Deltawing, and 3 Ford ecoboost DP, 1.)which Prototype platform will last the longest? 2.) How long before the first one of these goes into Bug Spray/BBQ mode first? 3.) Give a guess as to which finishing position overall all 6 of these cars will finish. 4.) And lastly, how many of each finish the race on track less than 100 laps down?
So you obviously think those 3 will be the most unreliable, but one of them will win anyways?![]()
That's pretty sweet!
Nonsense, those dumbed down NASCAB tube framed stone age pieces of junk don't stand a chance against the proper and pure sports car prototype LMP2. You must've forgotten your medicine this mornin XDDuh it will win, DP > everything else. Obviously you haven't been reading or paying attention to the tests around Daytona and Sebring.
WARNING: This is called sarcasm on the internet don't allow yourself to be caught gullible and get injured by it, thank you.
Muscle Milk stands a decent chance too. Young Brundle, a former Audi/Porsche factory driver, and Klaus Graf are all pretty good too.I think if the BOP is right the OAK Racing Morgan will win, they're the most professional team and have some decent drivers.
^^ Daytona has multiple huge leaderboards that show the positions of every car overall. I haven't been to Sebring recently enough to know if they do as well. What I do is use the grand am and now IMSA live T&S on the mobile app during the race. I'm all for reducing confusion during races as long as it doesn't create more confusion problems a.k.a the IMSA number panels and mirror color codingI like the position lights. Although I wish it was done by class, not overall position.
I know I've been to both Daytona and Sebring, its just nice seeing the position as the car goes by. And the position "tower" at Daytona is hard to read at some angles. I'm going to get a live time/scoring app too. Before I would just use the website from my phone browser.^^ Daytona has multiple huge leaderboards that show the positions of every car overall. I haven't been to Sebring recently enough to know if they do as well. What I do is use the grand am and now IMSA live T&S on the mobile app during the race. I'm all for reducing confusion during races as long as it doesn't create more confusion problems a.k.a the IMSA number panels and mirror color coding