2015 F1 Mechanics/Aero; Design predictions to win the WCC/WDC. READ FIRST POST

VAG group suddenly has a much more expensive problem than paying Horner to be a jerk-off. http://www.detroitnews.com/story/bu...l-vehicles-violated-emissions-rules/72401296/

Potential for $18 Billion in fines and the U.S. Justice Dept. opening a investigation is going to take a big bite out of their stock price, and leave little petty cash laying around to support a fizzy drink companies racing fetish.
Come on, they rigged their emissions regulation software to cheat. It's literally nothing that the Formula 1 teams haven't already done - remember the off-throttle blown diffuser saga?
 
Come on, they rigged their emissions regulation software to cheat. It's literally nothing that the Formula 1 teams haven't already done - remember the off-throttle blown diffuser saga?
Dont forget the rubber nose and the flexi floor too. The way things went for VAG today Red Bull might end up buying the remains of VAG at a discount.
 
image1.img.1536.medium.jpg

Singapore rear structure and floor update

image1.img.1536.medium.jpg

Old / New

Part of the Full car body upgrade the new nose and front wing section of the Sauber. Supposedly a lot of time spent in the CFD went to this build.
 

Red Bull will quite F1 if (insert today's excuse here). Personally I didn't mind them as winners... but I hate them as losers.

In other news; further to earlier mentions in this thread VW have now set aside around 7 billion Euro in anticipation of the losses from- and recall of at least 11 million vehicles. CEO Winterkorn has resigned. There's no word so far about what this might mean for an F1 project but my instinct is that it could be very bad news.
 
What does it cost to buy and develop a successful F1 team over 6/7 years? 2 billion dollars? Peanuts to VW over that period, it might help improve their image as well. I doubt those at the top of VW will see things that way though.
 
Last edited:
It's a shame given that I only ever believed a story true and final once on Autosport.

I only believe what is confirmed based on the popular region F1 news papers and sites based on how well they usually are at predicting or confirming. But overall I said racecar engineering is probably the most trusted by me, and then F1fanatic when it comes to F1 news and technology.

Mercedes is close to finalizing a deal with Manor for engine supplying next season, and aren't imposing a driver upon the team as part of the deal.

http://adamcooperf1.com/2015/09/26/manor-deal-close-as-mercedes-waits-for-lotus/

Merc usually don't do that as seen with Force India and even Williams and Lotus. Ferrari are the only group I think that are so arrogant about deals that you must take on one of their drivers as a test or full time.

I'm guessing this is not only to replace the mid to lower pack buffer Lotus were, but also to hopefully take away from Haas.
 
With Manor getting a Merc' engine...there's a slim chance for Ferrari power in the Red Bull (that is if Ferrari were stupid enough to hand over their engine to the team whose an engine away from dominance again so there's a 0.001% chance that happens).
 
With Manor getting a Merc' engine...there's a slim chance for Ferrari power in the Red Bull (that is if Ferrari were stupid enough to hand over their engine to the team whose an engine away from dominance again so there's a 0.001% chance that happens).

Yeah, that there is. And not just for RBR but STR, the problem is the parity that Red Bull want as if they're still with Renault or just feel the spirit of competition should be upheld. So, two con men enter a bar and try to persuade the other to do a deal with them, what do you get? RBR and Ferrari
 
I wanted completely free choice. But this is better, damnit. Much better.
Paul Hembrey explained further on the Suzuka grid - it won't be completely free choice; rather, there will be five compounds, and Pirelli will nominate three for each race (mostly to stop teams from making inappropriate choices, like the new "super-super softs" at Suzuka). One of these will be the prime tyre that everyone must use, while the other two will be options - actual options. It sounds like the teams will be free to use all three during practice before nominating their preferred option ahead of qualifying. There's no word on whether teams could nominate different options for individual drivers if the drivers have different preferences.
 
I think that's the intention. I doubt that it will have a massive impact, but it might open up some wiggle room when the pit window begins.

Now they just need to amend the "start on the tyres you qualified with" rule - it should be "start on the compound you qualified with, but you must use the tyres you qualified on in the race".
 
Now they just need to amend the "start on the tyres you qualified with" rule - it should be "start on the compound you qualified with, but you must use the tyres you qualified on in the race".

Yes, with the teams allowed to cover the sidewalls on the grid and radio comms for genuine emergencies and box instructions only.
 

Latest Posts

Back