rekt
Arlington National Cemetery
Resting place of many civil war casualties. During the civil war, the Union had so many casualties that they ran out of room in existing cemeteries. The US government tasked Montgomery Meigs to select a place for a new cemetery. Meigs had served under Robert E. Lee prior to the war, and sided with the Union when war broke out. He developed a hatred for the Confederacy, so during the war, when asked where a new cemetery should be, he immediately picked the site of Robert E. Lee's former home (pictured in the 2nd photo). He picked it so that the bodies of the dead soldiers that Lee killed could be laid at his doorstep, and close enough that he would never be able to live in his house again.
Even if it's unworkable and will waste a lot of money?Isn't that what we vote politicians for?
To do what they say and what the voters want?
Perhaps he's looking for a scapegoat.What is weird is he was the one that came up with the idea.
Not the first time and won't be the last.Even if it's unworkable and will waste a lot of money?
Then it's a good thing that you have all these checks and balances to prevent abuse of power like SCOTUS, the Senate and the House of Reps... oh wait.Not the first time and won't be the last.
Yes. Good post. Our system of checks and balances was carefully designed to prevent the tyranny of the majority, or mob rule. Democracy was always an experiment, and a dangerous one. Packing the Supreme Court, one-party rule, corruption at high levels, great distress in the low and middle classes are what may lead to extreme behavior; crime, riot and revolution. Here or anywhere.Then it's a good thing that you have all these checks and balances to prevent abuse of power like SCOTUS, the Senate and the House of Reps... oh wait.
Yes. Good post. Our system of checks and balances was carefully designed to prevent the tyranny of the majority, or mob rule. Democracy was always an experiment, and a dangerous one. Packing the Supreme Court, one-party rule, corruption at high levels, great distress in the low and middle classes are what may lead to extreme behavior; crime, riot and revolution. Here or anywhere.
Yes. Good post. Our system of checks and balances was carefully designed to prevent the tyranny of the majority, or mob rule. Democracy was always an experiment, and a dangerous one. Packing the Supreme Court, one-party rule, corruption at high levels, great distress in the low and middle classes are what may lead to extreme behavior; crime, riot and revolution. Here or anywhere.
Packing the Supreme Court
Not sure if this is tongue-in-cheek or not. (But I always dig the chance to use this nifty emoticon.)FDR doesn't get enough crap for single-handedly undermining an entire branch of government and crippling the US with court packing threats. He should have been working to bolster the supreme court, rather than destroy it. Probably the worst president in the history of the US.
Outwardly, he was one of the most successful and popular, the only president elected to 4 consecutive terms.
defined liberalism in the era
is celebrated by scholars as one of our 3 greatest along with Washington and Lincoln.
He interned the American Japanese
McKinley is the very worst, IMHO.I'm completely serious on worst president claims. I'd entertain alternatives though.
Unfortunately, it was in high school 53 years ago that I read and forgot about Ayn Rand. I follow Ron Paul, a little more in the real world for me these days. But I'm the guy who brought up the packing of the court as a first class sin.I don't think you'll get very many proud Libertarians speaking highly of FDR @Dotini
He's kind of the point where it all went wrong, if you happen to think like Dagny Taggart.
Packing the Supreme Court, one-party rule, corruption at high levels, great distress in the low and middle classes are what may lead to extreme behavior; crime, riot and revolution. Here or anywhere.
I'm completely serious on worst president claims. I'd entertain alternatives though.
The dubious honor of worst US President is most often given to John Tyler, namesake of my birthplace in Texas, and the only president in US history who refused to go to war. Which makes him the best IMHO.
For his entire term, Tyler refused to attack Mexico, to the great annoyance of seemingly everybody else in the country. Immediately upon gaining office, Polk set about rectifying that.When did he refuse to go to war? That does indeed make him the best President, or at least give him the accolade of best Presidential manoeuver.
We saw fit to name a pleasant small city for him in the verdant eastern edge of the state not far from Louisiana. But in the pantheon of heroic pioneers, Tyler is a nobody for most Texans.Texan independents must love Tyler.
But in the pantheon of heroic pioneers, Tyler is a nobody for most Texans.
USA Epidemic incomming.
http://outbreaks.globalincidentmap.com/
USA Epidemic incomming.
http://outbreaks.globalincidentmap.com/
Yes.USA epidemic of what is incomming?
I like how you have to move that map to even see New Zealand.
If you scroll the map to the right, the epidemics disappear.