I thought that was the point of a game? To have fun playing the game. I don't notice any obvious problems and I enjoy playing the game.I shouldn't have to rely on a racing experience to ignore 20-30 fps drops and a screen full of tearing; I should have both a great visual experience and racing experience.
Honestly?
You're comparing Tetris to Forza 7 and PCars 2?
I thought you were arguing for Forza? Research LiveTrack 3.0 before you make that last comment.4K 60 fps locked > not 4K and apparently not a priority on 60 fps(also 60 locked is apparently 1st party chest beating.).
700 cars > 180 cars.
Upgrading > No Upgrading.
3D puddles with hydroplaning > No hydroplaning.
I thought that was the point of a game? To have fun playing the game. I don't notice any obvious problems and I enjoy playing the game.
The reason for Tetris is that it's a far less advanced game yet would have 12K and 120FPS. Maybe we should give him a literal black square with 2000FPS and 600K on one screen.
I thought you were arguing for Forza? Research LiveTrack 3.0 before you make that last comment.
You do realize how much of a joke you're making yourself look like by comparing wanting a 60 fps racing experience with a black square?
Oh god, how dare I want my racing game not to run like crap.
Forza has changing track temperatures, dynamic weather with 3D puddling and hydroplaning too.
@ this thread. Very entertaining.
Yes, I prioritise enjoyable racing over something I barely notice if at all. What a horrible crime. If you think I'm making a joke of myself, you're on a Project CARS 2 forum thread saying how Forza is better. You're in the wrong place man.
If you think I'm making a joke of myself, you're on a Project CARS 2 forum thread saying how Forza is better. You're in the wrong place man.
This link might help you understand my point.You're literally comparing wanting a racing game to run at 60 most of the time to a 600k 2000fps black square, how is the not a joke?
This link might help you understand my point.
I know I'm not. Because @breyzipp went down that line first.I know what you were doing, believe it or not but you're not the only one who can be facetious or hyperbolic.
The point is that Turn 10 implements features when it can while maintaining a locked 60 and native resolution. SMS implements features before they are able to maintain performance(or never) or native resolution; so implying that Turn 10 is playing catch up, which is what started this back and forth, is silly.
I know I'm not. Because @breyzipp went down that line first.
We have enough stability for it to be playable and clearly, Xbox is worse than PS because I haven't experienced or noticed anything of the like so the features are fine. Maybe Microsoft should have built a console that could handle it.
You do realize how much of a joke you're making yourself look like by comparing wanting a 60 fps racing experience with a black square?
Oh god, how dare I want my racing game not to run like crap.
Forza has changing track temperatures, dynamic weather with 3D puddling and hydroplaning too.
Is that you @Greek?I know what you were doing, believe it or not but you're not the only one who can be facetious or hyperbolic.
The point is that Turn 10 implements features when it can while maintaining a locked 60 and native resolution. SMS implements features before they are able to maintain performance(or never) or native resolution; so implying that Turn 10 is playing catch up, which is what started this back and forth, is silly.
I know what you were doing, believe it or not but you're not the only one who can be facetious or hyperbolic.
The point is that Turn 10 implements features when it can while maintaining a locked 60 and native resolution. SMS implements features before they are able to maintain performance(or never) or native resolution; so implying that Turn 10 is playing catch up, which is what started this back and forth, is silly.
Is that you @Greek?
Mate, Project Cars 2 is in another league compared to Forza. Just because it "claims" to have locked 60FPS,
Maybe you should read the rest before you comment with something useless and ignorant.Got about that far and stopped reading.
Not even sure why you quoted "claims".
Maybe you should read the rest before you comment with something useless and ignorant.
4K 60 fps locked > not 4K and apparently not a priority on 60 fps(also 60 locked is apparently 1st party chest beating.).
700 cars > 180 cars.
Upgrading > No Upgrading.
Well I don't know what you would have read if you didn't. Everyone else would have stopped because it was the end.That's funny, because that's the exact reason I stopped reading the comment.
Forza doesn't have Pokemon cards.700 cars. Yay I guess? I'd rather have proper multiclass races with the cars you'd see on Blancpain, imsa, indy etc than have a library of cars most of which I'd never used or race against. I'm not collecting pokemon cards, this is sports car racing.
Unless you were on pc you did have an issue, it just didn't bother you.As for fps, never had an issue
700 cars. Yay I guess? I'd rather have proper multiclass races with the cars you'd see on Blancpain, imsa, indy etc than have a library of cars most of which I'd never used or race against. I'm not collecting pokemon cards, this is sports car racing.
As for fps, never had an issue
Or I just didn't notice, not an issue. If that's the case is rather live with more features than a guaranteed 60 fpsForza doesn't have Pokemon cards.
Unless you were on pc you did have an issue, it just didn't bother you.
Is that you @Greek?
What is going on here?
The point is the issue exists, that's a fact. It doesn't affect you apparently but others are more sensitive to it.Or I just didn't notice, not an issue. If that's the case is rather live with more features than a guaranteed 60 fps
Can we stop the stupid, petty, childish willy waving. The thread title does what was actually said no favours. Why people can't just enjoy both for what they are and accept that both have their shortcomings I have no idea. This constant need to defend you chosen one from some perceived attack is unhealthy.
Can I have your WMD Forum ID please? I would like to have a conversation with you over there.
Not sure if serious.
Hmmm... times must have changed.
http://www.pushsquare.com/news/2009..._perfection_for_gran_turismo_5s_damage_system
None story. Each franchise is playing catch up in some respects. GTS has a lighting engine that the other two need to catch up to. FM7 has a car roster that the other two can only dream of and PC2 has a time and weather progression system with Livetrack 3.0 that would be wonderful to see in all three. So he's right GT and FM are playing catch up but then so is Project Cars.
Just people claiming multiple accounts because they can't fathom how more than one person couldn't agree with their opinion.