Cursed Political Content

  • Thread starter TexRex
  • 6,655 comments
  • 325,373 views
I wonder what the other 7% voted for.

Wait, no I don't. But polls that quote percentages that don't add up to 100% are bothersome.
 
I don't get the MAGA War Room thing. Why are they at war with other Americans? The previous bunch of losers I mean patriots who tried that didn't have much success. Perhaps those who don't learn from history (and indeed want to outlaw its teaching in schools) are destined to repeat it.
 
Last edited:
A TERF is demanding trans tweeters post pictures of their genitals to prove they're female after practising on dead people.

 
Last edited:
Once again, doors are the enemy, not guns.

So apparently this dude really didn't know the facts because to gain entry to the school, the shooter shot through the door to break it open.
 
Screenshot-20230329-122013-Samsung-Internet.jpg


Mental illness.
 
Who needs rear visibility?! I only drive forward!
I know this Trumpmobile doesn't have it but my wife's Highlander has an always-on camera just above the license plate that sends the image to the rear view mirror. It's frickin' amazing.
 
Holy crap Greggy is ready to grab his ankles for his bronzer daddy.


Gutfield does know that the G in OG stands for gangster, right? And that gangsters are, by definition, criminals?
 
Last edited:
Since we're indicting politicians now, can we use it as a precedent to indict other politicians? We can start with Matt Gaetz for sex trafficking and stealing his own personal Cuban boy and then just start working our way down.

It's weird to me (OK not really) that people are lining up to call this move bad. I wish more people understood that having a former president charged with a crime that they very likely are guilty of is a good thing. It opens the door to go after other criminal politicians. Sure, Trump happens to be Republican but I bet if you investigated politicians as a whole, neither party would be remotely clean. Let's get them all and maybe, just maybe, the federal government can move a few inches toward being a functioning system.
 
Since we're indicting politicians now, can we use it as a precedent to indict other politicians? We can start with Matt Gaetz for sex trafficking and stealing his own personal Cuban boy and then just start working our way down.

It's weird to me (OK not really) that people are lining up to call this move bad. I wish more people understood that having a former president charged with a crime that they very likely are guilty of is a good thing. It opens the door to go after other criminal politicians. Sure, Trump happens to be Republican but I bet if you investigated politicians as a whole, neither party would be remotely clean. Let's get them all and maybe, just maybe, the federal government can move a few inches toward being a functioning system.
As I said in the America thread, the move is not bad (as Trump probably should have been indicted for something), but rather did the grand jury attempt a risky move by choosing this particular case.
 
As I said in the America thread, the move is not bad (as Trump probably should have been indicted for something), but rather did the grand jury attempt a risky move by choosing this particular case.
I don't think this is a risky move at all. They wouldn't have brought the indictment unless 1.) they have an abundance of facts to prove the case; and 2.) they believe it's a simple enough case for even the simplest of jurors to understand.
 
Gutfield does know that the G in OG stands for gangster, right? And that gangsters are, by definition, criminals?
Trump is more of a UG. Unoriginal, but still a gangster. "OJ" might be closer to the mark, especially if he were wearing an orange jumpsuit. "Carrot-colored crim" or "fulvous felon" would be even better.
 
Last edited:
MadCaw appears to be baring more than his opinion in the following naked comment video.

 
Last edited:
Back