Once again, doors are the enemy, not guns.
Incoming motion from Republicans to have bullet-proof doors in schools than you know… addressing the real issue.So apparently this dude really didn't know the facts because to gain entry to the school, the shooter shot through the door to break it open.
Apparently it means nothing because I have no idea what TQ is either.
Lesbian. Gay. Bisexual. Trans. Queer.Apparently it means nothing because I have no idea what TQ is either.
Ahhh, I read LGB as Let's Go Brandon. Yep I terrible.Lesbian. Gay. Bisexual. Trans. Queer.
Ahhh, I read LGB as Let's Go Brandon. Yep I terrible.
Who needs rear visibility?! I only drive forward!
I know this Trumpmobile doesn't have it but my wife's Highlander has an always-on camera just above the license plate that sends the image to the rear view mirror. It's frickin' amazing.Who needs rear visibility?! I only drive forward!
What a terrible day to have eyes.
But i imagine they are very backwards looking in their overall views.Who needs rear visibility?! I only drive forward!
Holy crap Greggy is ready to grab his ankles for his bronzer daddy.
As I said in the America thread, the move is not bad (as Trump probably should have been indicted for something), but rather did the grand jury attempt a risky move by choosing this particular case.Since we're indicting politicians now, can we use it as a precedent to indict other politicians? We can start with Matt Gaetz for sex trafficking and stealing his own personal Cuban boy and then just start working our way down.
It's weird to me (OK not really) that people are lining up to call this move bad. I wish more people understood that having a former president charged with a crime that they very likely are guilty of is a good thing. It opens the door to go after other criminal politicians. Sure, Trump happens to be Republican but I bet if you investigated politicians as a whole, neither party would be remotely clean. Let's get them all and maybe, just maybe, the federal government can move a few inches toward being a functioning system.
I don't think this is a risky move at all. They wouldn't have brought the indictment unless 1.) they have an abundance of facts to prove the case; and 2.) they believe it's a simple enough case for even the simplest of jurors to understand.As I said in the America thread, the move is not bad (as Trump probably should have been indicted for something), but rather did the grand jury attempt a risky move by choosing this particular case.
Trump is more of a UG. Unoriginal, but still a gangster. "OJ" might be closer to the mark, especially if he were wearing an orange jumpsuit. "Carrot-colored crim" or "fulvous felon" would be even better.Gutfield does know that the G in OG stands for gangster, right? And that gangsters are, by definition, criminals?