- 9,089
- Scotland
You can see why the 320TC's used to struggle! They were only good for about 275bhp.
Lawl if you think they were that low.
You can see why the 320TC's used to struggle! They were only good for about 275bhp.
Well according to GT5 the S2000 320i from '04 (E46? Not good with model names sorry) were at 276hp. I reckon the next BTCC one was around 300hp.
Considering it was built by the best engine builder in the BTCC NBE it's far bit more than 275 and more than 300.
West Surrey racing have run the Neil brown engineering engine. Same as what Honda and pirtek use.
This year and last? Was the chassis etc. S2000 and the engine NGTC in 2012 then?
Correct last year NGTC engine from Neil Brown Engineering with the S2000 Chassis.
Yes, all cars used NGTC engines in 2012.
And in 2011 only the BMWs and Chevrolet's didn't use NGTC engines. (apart from Lea Wood's BTC Integra).
I watched all 3 races on youtube today. Exciting stuff!
Linkage sir?
Woah, shocking news. Surprised no one picked up on it earlier - http://www.lep.co.uk/news/local/driver-in-court-over-a6-death-1-5231478
It depends on what he has been charged with. When you are arrested, you are charged with a specific crime. If you are committed to stand trial, then you are tried for the crime you are charged with. If Wrathall was charged with dangerous driving occasioning death, then he won't stand trial for manslaughter - he'll stand trial for dangerous driving occasioning death. It will only change if he pleads guilty to a lesser-included offence. Prosecutors will sometimes charge people with two separate, but related crimes; in this case, manslaughter and dangerous driving occasioning death. Wrathall would stand trial for manslaughter, but may plead guilty to the lesser offence, dangerous driving occasioning death, in exchange for a lighter sentence.Would that go down as manslaughter?
Level 3 - This is driving that created a significant risk of danger and is likely to be characterised by:
Driving above the speed limit/at a speed that is inappropriate for the prevailing conditions OR
Driving when knowingly deprived of adequate sleep or rest or knowing that the vehicle has a dangerous defect or is poorly maintained or is dangerously leaded OR
A brief but obvious danger arising from a seriously dangerous manoeuvre OR
Driving whilst avoidably distracted OR
Failing to have proper regard to vulnerable road users
The starting point and range overlap with Level 2 is to allow the breadth of discretion necessary to accommodate circumstances where there are significant aggravating factors.
Nature of offence: Level 3
Driving that created a significant risk of danger
[where the driving is markedly less culpable than for this level, reference should be made to the starting point and range for the most serious level of causing death by careless driving]
Starting point: 3 years custody
Sentencing range: 2-5 years custody
He hasn't been steller the past 2 or 3 rounds. Obviously had stuff on his mind.
Hopefully for Frank he gets cleared, but it doesn't sound good. If he loses his license or has to serve time I wonder if Dynojet will find someone else? Its a family team and it seems unclear how much of the sponsorship is personal or external?
If he's convicted of death by dangerous driving, he will will lose his licence and since he is solely culpable (driving on the phone) he will, in all likelihood, get jail time (minimum of a year, max of 14 depending on circumstances).