Gran Turismo HD Demo at E3

  • Thread starter The359
  • 332 comments
  • 23,699 views
played it at e3...my thoughts....

It is only 20% done in its developement phase....
The demo only allowed you to drive with tcs on....
The background and everything is incredible...trees guardrails...clouds...people...lots of cars......Best hd i have seen...The depth is incredible, it helps make the experience even more real.
Cars and bikes together at last!
The cars move like in gt4 but couldn't really feel it out since tcs was on....
pretty much an updated gt4 but with incredible graphics....but for what it was...a demo...it was great!


and the logitech wheel.....I tried it and was told it was for pc use only....but the steering did not feel as good as the dfp...maybe it was the fact that it was a pc game and not gt...


For those who think 60fps is too slow or that the hd didn't look that great on a webcast...You must see to believe....I played it and I am still jawdropped....True Gt fans that appreciate the hard work PD does know what this game is about. No online in gt4 proabbly because it didn't run flawless like Kaz wanted...but they are beta testing so online for a gt be it gt5 or 4.5 will be here.

FOR THOSE WHO THINK GTHD IS GOING TO BE RELEASED.....*sigh* wish you could read
 
Some shot of GTHD at E3 just got released. Looks like GT4 in 1080i mode. No big difference, if you ask me. It would be nice to have since the dot crawl issues would be solved.

scea1_11.jpg


scea1_12.jpg


scea1_13.jpg


scea1_14.jpg


scea1_15.jpg
 
I love that last screen. That's the one I was asking for. The Model T has lead spot! :D
 
I guess you have to see it by yourself to experience the true quality of GTHD, photos tell only half the story. Regarding the quality of GT4 in 1080i due to the tricks they used, true 1080 with 1920 horizontal pixels and 60 full frames a second is in a different world.

Regards
the Interceptor
 
The pics also indicate that PD will allow us to race cars that previously wasn´t able to compete against any opposition!
 
What does that vid tell us about what we may see ni GT5.

Possibility of GT and TT both merging together as a single franchise.
It's being developed to run true HD.
Larger grids of cars (though we knew that from the VGT vids).
Cars that were "special cars" in GT4 will not be an issue and will be useable in races against AI.
 
I for one do not give two sh@ts about seeing anything in 1080p, 720p will do just fine, such high resolutions are just a drain on resources to begin with, If RAM was cheap as hell and the PS3 had like 1Gig of 667MHz Rambus, then hey go all out, but that isn't the reality of it.

PD needs to just keep at it, what I saw in the TGS video was GT5 level car models(Evo 9 and RX7), and just rock and roll from there. We already know the physics engine was built completely new, to incorporate over 6000 calculations instead of the 600 in GT4, something like that Kaz said, last year.
What I want is more realistic car showing, no more magical hp numbers, much more adept AI, deeper customization, paint shop, Online, integration of a clutch system, actually having a Neutral gear... stuff like that.

I sure hope that PD keeps us informed on what new car liscences they have acquired. Noble anyone????
 
SavageEvil
I for one do not give two sh@ts about seeing anything in 1080p, 720p will do just fine, such high resolutions are just a drain on resources to begin with, If RAM was cheap as hell and the PS3 had like 1Gig of 667MHz Rambus, then hey go all out, but that isn't the reality of it.

You are completely right, SE.

I prefer a thousand times PS3 memory and processing power being used for more important things like handling 63 different AI patterns real-time for all your computer opponents, distributed/spread computing to link PS3 to PS3 with a 2 player battle and each PS3 handling their set of 32 AI opponoents, 64 channel doppler effects and else than trying to watch a LINE in my television set even knowing it is way impossible to human eye capacity.

I.e (1481374810p x 4578485)

1080 is way good. Now that is solved, move to other things (racing aspects, car field, car catalogue, etc...)
 
Anyone starting to see that the words of Iwata from Nintendo rings true? Everyone seems to want to have the best graphics and sounds, but are missing the true essence which is playing the game and having fun, you can't have fun with pretty graphics and no playability. That's like having a Ferrari 360 with an I4 engine.

Focus, focus, focus...seems like the Wii is causing all sorts of ripples in the pond, might turn to waves if it's launch is successful.
 
SavageEvil
Vio, welcome to GTP.
I have been around for some time now, but thanks, anyway!

Same mistakes eh, would you care to elaborate on that point.
I think someone mentioned it before, the GT4-demo (or GT4Prologue) featured different (and better) sounds ... and then they re-used the old ones for GT4.
It's not like GT4 sounds like nothing before ... it still is the best game to get, I agree with that.
Then this HD-trailer - and the same samples, again. I don't really care if it's the PS2 screwing up, the PS3 should be able to do better. And still you can tell just by listening that it's GT4.
I know, I know, it is GT4, just 1980x1080 and a demo etc.

I do know that GT4, keeping in mind that the PS2 with it's RISC-CPU isn't really state-of-the-art compared to the 'Box, still has to be considered a miracle (remember RR5! looks today like it can't be a PS2 game compared to GT4) ... but i did expect a bit more than just a tweaked GT4 in HD.

It's my fault for expecting too much, getting home in the afternoon and being all crazy for the new trailer and screenshots - and then seeing "just" GT4.
Sorry for that but I was so disappointed after that vid, my apologies!


1.Why don't the cars have reverse lights when they go backwards? Probably because PD missed that little detail, but does it change your experience, probably not.
It's a detail that I still miss, even more since Kazunori is a petrolhead himself.
Enthusia hasn't got 'em either, but i would love to see that ... (Enthusia, however, has warning lights if you pause the game ... i like such details ^^*)


2.Why are there the same 2000? year old sound samples since GT1? Man are you drunk, none of the sound samples in GT3 or 4 are from the playstation versions, as a matter of fact GT4's sounds are all new, the problem is that the sample rate which they were recorded, the PS2 cannot handle them, so they are basically brought down to PS2 sound processor levels, which affected the quality greatly. Cheap tire squeal sound? Hey i suggest you get yourself a better sound system, GT4's tire squeals are quite different, especially when you go from standard to racing tires, ever heard of road noise?.
Take out GT3 and GT4 and compare the engine-sounds... there are new ones, like the Amemiya RX-7 - but then there's a huge bunch of ones that were in GT3 .... and after 4 years it would be nice to have new ones.
There might be improved versions of some of the GT3 samples, but I still want better ones - I'm still hoping that GT5 will make it better. If it takes more time, no prob, I can wait till 2008. ^^



Don't assume that everyone that plays GT4 and praises it is a mindless fanboy, sorry not this individual. I love the game for what it is, and hands down it is the more complete package than any other game out there, you want super cars, you got it, you want econo boxes, there you go, middle of the road cars...almost every type of car is represented in GT4. Even though it's physics aren't as great as other games, they give you a sense of what driving is like, which is essentially Kaz's aim.
Sorry if you got me wrong, I didn't want to say that everyone who praises the game is a fanboy.

It's just that not loving them isn't bashing them, either. I was expecting too much and was disappointed ... should have waited a bit longer and post then, heh ...



What else do you think GT should be about that GT series hasn't attempted to implement whole heartedly, please feel free to digress, we ain't charging you per letter typed.
Having done over 24.000 km in A-SPEC, I spent more time alone on the track than racing other cars - and, having just 8% to go until 100%, it doesn't look like I will get the intense bumper-to-bumper racing in GT4 I was hoping for.
It's called the "Real Driving Simulator", and it does well in just being the best game to drive a car around a track, but I wanted a racing game and got "just" a driving simulator.

The AI kicks you off-track, doesn't care if you are trying to overtake and then there are these rare moments when you get "real racing" moves and the AI, for whatever reasons, doesn't destroy the whole "real racing"-feeling.
It feels like it could have been so much more - and that's what makes me sad about GT4. It could have been ....
Again, I still love my GT4 and love to drive my Storm V12 around Motegi and then getting into the Honda S500 and cruising through Deep Forest.
It's just that having good racing is sometimes impossible.



With that said, please enjoy your time on the boards...don't feel intimidated by anything I have said, just know that when you say something be prepared for opinionated individuals to let you know what they think. Happy posting.
Thanks! I'm still impressed by the fair-minded way most people can talk to each other ... it's something that is way unusual the bigger a BSS gets.




the Interceptor
Good point, but there are a few problems. First off, they can't affort to make such a bad new GT5, cause the "blind buyers" only make a fraction of the whole cake. Secondly, there's honour. It might sound ridiculous to you, but I actually think that at least some people (including Kazunori Yamauchi) have the will to make a good product to satisfy customers (or at least himself in this case).
Don't get me wrong, I would buy GT5 on the first day it comes out, but I was a bit disappointed by the trailer ...
I think there's no reason to assume that Kazunori would put out a merely "clone" of GT4, but I fear that Sony might force Kazunori (and PD) to put out anything in order to boost sales when the PS3 launches.
If that would happen (which is very unlikely, but nevertheless,) and people would actually buy such a game, Sony might get the impression that they can get away with this ....
I know, it's very unlikely, but seeing how innovation is lost in the videogames-market, I fear that it might get worse ...



the Interceptor
What I was trying to point out was that too many people have lost perspective here. They get a game that gives them hundeds of hours of joy, and all that comes to their mind is bashing it for some details they don't like. People have got too used to Gran Turismo, so they get lost in details, rather than being glad it is there in the first place. Some guys just need to step back and see the whole picture.
I'll agree that I forgot for a moment how great GT4 is - and you are right there, I got carried away after watching the trailer and being disappointed - sorry for that!



the interceptor
The 1080p thing from E3 was just about showing off what the PS3 is capable of in my eyes. What we saw there shouldn't be taken too seriously, it was PDs try to show up with at least something. So, if you claim that GT4 suffers from too little computing power on the PS2, why not show what it would have been like if it would run on the PS3?
I actually do understand that some people are disappointed, and that also is a matter of what you are/were expecting.
Again, I have to agree - I can see now why they were doing this whole 1080p-stuff ... it was my mistake for expecting too much. But it's PD and GT, after all ... they tempt you to expect miracles all the time :D.
 
man if I was only there:grumpy: I would have loved to play the S*** of that demo. I was more excited over seeing the larger grids and the two new cars on the Circuit De la Sarthe demonstraition then I was about the Graphics. well, either I'll have to get lucky to possibly find a nearby game store with the demo, or wait till GT5 comes out.
 
cal33
Look at all those cars..... :) I hope we can race like this.

92837920050516screen0031tv.jpg
I do too. its much more challenging and fun to get past say 20 cars then it is 6.
 
GTHD "demo" preinstalled on the HD? Nah, we'd have to pay and download it......

I would pay $50 for the full game. it clearly has bikes and cars and possibly a few extras. I still play GT4 and the washed out color (faked)1080i and lack of AA needs an upgrade. We'd be playing photomode.
 
Once again, GT HD is nothing more than a tech demo, that will has a 99% chance of never seeing the light of day.

Hey Vio, GT3 and GT4 are on the same system, the sounds aren't going to get any better, as I said PD already had an engine built for GT on PS2, hence why some cars sound the same, the PS2 sound processor isn't as great as Sony made it out to be.

If you listened to the sounds coming from the GT HD demo, you would have noticed that the sample rates were very high, the sound from the Nismo 350Z JGTC is just beautiful, along with ambient crowd noises. Take a closer look at the demo, the only thing that are still GT4 is the game code, hence why the visuals don't look any better than GT4's. GTHD is nothing more than a demo. Why did everyone forget the TGS video?!?
 
RACECAR
I do too. its much more challenging and fun to get past say 20 cars then it is 6.
I don't. I'd rather race 6 idiots instead of 20 idiots. Unless they substantially improve the AI, I say nay to the whole "20 cars on a track" deal.
 
Mustang-man
I didn't mean to sound angry or aggressive etc in my last post either. :embarrassed:

This was a few pages back, but I just wanted to commend you, Mustang-man, for keeping your cool in your response to me -- I now realize that my post could have been construed as rather harsh, but I didn't really intend for it to be that way. :)

In any case, live4speed pretty much summed up my feelings on GT4's compromises in post #121. ( 👍 to him)

SavageEvil
Anyone starting to see that the words of Iwata from Nintendo rings true? Everyone seems to want to have the best graphics and sounds, but are missing the true essence which is playing the game and having fun, you can't have fun with pretty graphics and no playability. That's like having a Ferrari 360 with an I4 engine.

Focus, focus, focus...seems like the Wii is causing all sorts of ripples in the pond, might turn to waves if it's launch is successful.

That's exactly what I think of GT4. Tons and tons of cars, pretty graphics, photomode, b-spec, etc....and it's no fun to play at all.
 
Sure it is. I'll tell you what's no fun. The thought of spending $35 on a PC demo that has less than 20 cars and 5 tracks, none of them real, that might mess with your graphics settings to boot. :P
 
Tenacious D
Sure it is. I'll tell you what's no fun. The thought of spending $35 on a PC demo that has less than 20 cars and 5 tracks, none of them real, that might mess with your graphics settings to boot. :P

:lol: ....did you ever even play it?
 
No. Honestly, I don't have anything against LFS - except for frooking up my graphics somehow. It doesn't really install, but it sure did wrench something in the registry. Go figure.

But I'm having way too much fun with Forza, and there are no installation headaches, there's over 200 cars, along with 40 plus tracks, body kits and the paint shop which I'm diving into head first. I want to race the snot out of the Saleens and Ferraris! Plus there's online racing everyone says I need to at least give a shot. And I'd really like to explore Sega GT, and get back to Gran Turismo when I can catch my breath.

Live For Speed with its demo of... what, four cars and two tracks? Hrm... even the full game seems so... puny. Physics is nice and all, but I couldn't care less about drifting and donuts. I want to create and paint up some darn race cars.
 
To each his own I guess. I'm pretty sure that other than for its licensing system LFS doesn't mess with the registry, since you can install the game with a copy/paste operation. That looks more like an hardware / O.S. issue to me.

It's too bad that you couldn't at least have one close online race, on the edge with 10-20 other good racers though. That's what the game is all about.
 
I didn't even get to the Sony booth today. Tomorrow I'm going to live in there. I'm really hoping for better sound. I'll take lots of pics and video.
 
Tenacious D
Physics is nice and all, but I couldn't care less about drifting and donuts. I want to create and paint up some darn race cars.

A. Live for Speed's realism carries it far beyond the mere ability to drift or do donuts... :sly:

B. I assure you that creating a custom skin in Live for Speed is more flexible than Forza's system...and perhaps a bit easier to use, with the mouse and all, along with whatever features your image-editing software has. ;)
 
Wolfe2x7
B. I assure you that creating a custom skin in Live for Speed is more flexible than Forza's system...and perhaps a bit easier to use, with the mouse and all, along with whatever features your image-editing software has. ;)
Indeed. :D



[/shameless plug][/off-topic]
 
SavageEvil
Once again, GT HD is nothing more than a tech demo, that will has a 99% chance of never seeing the light of day.

Hey Vio, GT3 and GT4 are on the same system, the sounds aren't going to get any better, as I said PD already had an engine built for GT on PS2, hence why some cars sound the same, the PS2 sound processor isn't as great as Sony made it out to be.

If you listened to the sounds coming from the GT HD demo, you would have noticed that the sample rates were very high, the sound from the Nismo 350Z JGTC is just beautiful, along with ambient crowd noises. Take a closer look at the demo, the only thing that are still GT4 is the game code, hence why the visuals don't look any better than GT4's. GTHD is nothing more than a demo. Why did everyone forget the TGS video?!?
People still arguing about this, huh?

What the hell happened to Vision Gran Turismo? Huh?

Like the man said, why has everyone forgotten about the TGS GT4 video? It was here, then went away, just like GTHD will.

Move on, please.
 
I don't. I'd rather race 6 idiots instead of 20 idiots. Unless they substantially improve the AI, I say nay to the whole "20 cars on a track" deal.
racing six cars and passing all of them in one lap and building a huge gap with no one chasing tends to get boring unless my car is slower and threfore is a challenge. now at least with twenty, it keeps you on your feet (and makes for some awesome racing).yes, if the A.I. is better, that would be better. but I'm used to getting pass fields of more then six cars so I want that challenge that I'm getting from games like Total Immersion Racing and Le Mans 24 Hours from GT.
 
I think the idea was of trying create a close race on to have the AI drive like your not there, you know the whole two car's can't occupy the same space scenario. Trying to have a close race in GT4 is hell thanks to the stupid AI, imagine multiplying that hell by 3 or 4 times for 20 ish car grids.
 
Stupid AI = ToCA Race Driver 3. You talk about the mindless drones in GT4, at least those mindless drones don't ram your ass off the track as you're trying to make a successful come-from-behind victory. ToCA RD 3 knows you're there, there to be taken off the road. GT4 does have the "mindless throne" deal in that they can give your rear bumper a real whack job. Even then, I don't really think the AI is THAT bad to the point where the AI in GT4 can make the difference between you winning and losing.

Different strokes for different folks. I speak the truth on GT4 and ToCA RD 3. I run perfectly with both titles, and ToCA RD 3 is actually worse than GT4 no matter what anyone says.
 
Ahh, but they do, only usually shunting you from the rear so you go screeching stright off on any tighter turns and they turn into you on corners because your a little bit on the line they want to take, you just have bad look in ToCA John, the AI is far from perfect but in my experience it's a hell of a lot better than GT4's :lol:. Besides that, regarding the AI in ToCA, usually when it does ram you, does it on purpose :lol:.
 
Back