He wasn't exactly super positive about Gran Turismo either:
One of his more recent articles is interesting as well:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonev...reviews-are-broken-and-things-have-to-change/
He's talking largely about the debacle surrounding Street Fighter V (and rightly so), but I can't see someone who holds those opinions being kind at all about GT5 or GT6.
If I was Sony/Polyphony, even if I had the utmost confidence in the quality of my product, I'd want my early review to be from someone who was more likely to uphold the great tradition of fluffing over problems in reviews instead of someone who sounds like he's primed to spit the dummy.
Or how about this:
I’ve been screaming it from every platform available to me: Pre-release and day of launch reviews of games with predominantly multiplayer components are not only wrong for consumers, they can be straight up misleading.
GTS is supposely to have what is currently it's main headlining feature be online.
I like the guy, he seems like a decent reviewer. He'd be a good choice to review something like Dirt Rally or AC. Or even a Driveclub VR experience. But Gran Turismo Sport? Risky if you're Sony or Polyphony, that's playing with fire.
Maybe you get a good review. Maybe he just turns around and writes "This is exactly the sort of PR BS that I've been talking about, and I hate that I'm feeding it to you in order to earn a cheque. So I won't." It's not like he hasn't
done something similar before.
The more of his stuff I read, the more I hope he does have a copy of GTS. I want to know what someone with his views of the current state of gaming and the review industry around gaming thinks of it.
*P.S. Ironically, his prediction for the release of a complete version of GT6 was spot on.