GTRA | RSeat WSGTC S3 | Main Thread

  • Thread starter Masi_23
  • 4,535 comments
  • 203,296 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Twice in a few pages to say this:

"What Tony said" :sly:

Honestly also, 50kg is way too much for the winner imo - you're saying to give the winner of Race 1 a half second penalty + the tyre wear for Race 2, that's a ton so early in the season. I'd expect that sort of penalty if someone had won a couple of races in a row maybe, but not from a single victory. I would much prefer a 30/20/10 split - and to only drop weight if you finish 5th or below (as in Johan's post, because you end up with a 20kg "swing" from 3rd --> 4th which isn't fair).

Ballast in quali is not a good proposal imo either - Qualifying should be to sort the quickest from the quick, not the heaviest from the not so heavy. I don't want to see a top driver end up in Division 2 just because he has a ton of weight on board.
 
Andil
Twice in a few pages to say this:

"What Tony said" :sly:

Honestly also, 50kg is way too much for the winner imo - you're saying to give the winner of Race 1 a half second penalty + the tyre wear for Race 2, that's a ton so early in the season. I'd expect that sort of penalty if someone had won a couple of races in a row maybe, but not from a single victory. I would much prefer a 30/20/10 split - and to only drop weight if you finish 5th or below (as in Johan's post, because you end up with a 20kg "swing" from 3rd --> 4th which isn't fair).

Ballast in quali is not a good proposal imo either - Qualifying should be to sort the quickest from the quick, not the heaviest from the not so heavy. I don't want to see a top driver end up in Division 2 just because he has a ton of weight on board.

I've tried not to talk about the actual ballast values dished out, I've just been talking about the principles of the system.

The pace that you are able to achieve during qualifying should be the same as what you'll be able to achieve during the race.

For arguments sake, whats the point in someone qualifying with no ballast in d1 if once they put their ballast on for the race they cant run with anyone and ride around at the back?

Extreme example? Maybe. But to be honest I think most are only thinking about worst case/extreme scenarios that just aren't going to happen.
 
Scanny_Flick
I've tried not to talk about the actual ballast values dished out, I've just been talking about the principles of the system.

The pace that you are able to achieve during qualifying should be the same as what you'll be able to achieve during the race.

For arguments sake, whats the point in someone qualifying with no ballast in d1 if once they put their ballast on for the race they cant run with anyone and ride around at the back?

Extreme example? Maybe. But to be honest I think most are only thinking about worst case/extreme scenarios that just aren't going to happen.

Take PURE JGTS as an example, after 8 rounds six drivers are carrying ballast. Highest is Tony with 120, other 5 are spread between 20 and 60. Not too drastic after all is it?

Sorry for all the posts, damn phone!!
 
Nope not at all 👍. (Tony is insane to be able to still fight for wins with that weight :eek:, espically in Pure which has some pretty good drivers :D)
 
I think if you can't be in D1 because you're slow on a qualifying basis, you'll be slow on race pace, thus it makes no sense for you to be in D1 in the first place. Do I make sense?

Having said that, I see the point of 200kg being too much, buf if a driver is able to score a podium with 150+ kg... then, 50 more would not make a difference. Maybe he'll go down to 5th or 6th. Will lose 20kg, and will be close to the podium again, and in two races he's podium material again (since he was fighting for the podium at 150+ kg).

The main point here is that while the weight limit is very high, you'll only reach it if you're very fast. And if you're very fast with that much weight on board, chances are you're winning a lot, so it does not bother you too much.

It would be unfair for a driver to win a race and get a 200kg ballast right away, but what if one wins a race, has 50kg, and on the next race he's 4th? Then he's down to 30kg, and that's not so much in my opinion.

As for everyone who "criticizes" the "Prost approach" of the championship, I take you guys know about SuperGT, right? They run ballast in both qualifying and races (and I believe there is, or at least used to be, ballast for the fastest qualifiers), and they have A LOT of strategy going on. Teams qualifying low in the grid just so they don't get ballast, but still trying to be ahead enough so they can fight for the win; some others try to finish around 3rd or 4th in the races, just so they keep their chances high with no ballast, only to give it their all in the last one or two races, etc.

This is SuperGT, and it's more than just racing. It's also thinking which position may suit you because of the ballast. And I don't know about you guys, but I find it utterly interesting.
 
I think if you can't be in D1 because you're slow on a qualifying basis, you'll be slow on race pace, thus it makes no sense for you to be in D1 in the first place. Do I make sense?

Having said that, I see the point of 200kg being too much, buf if a driver is able to score a podium with 150+ kg... then, 50 more would not make a difference. Maybe he'll go down to 5th or 6th. Will lose 20kg, and will be close to the podium again, and in two races he's podium material again (since he was fighting for the podium at 150+ kg).

The main point here is that while the weight limit is very high, you'll only reach it if you're very fast. And if you're very fast with that much weight on board, chances are you're winning a lot, so it does not bother you too much.

It would be unfair for a driver to win a race and get a 200kg ballast right away, but what if one wins a race, has 50kg, and on the next race he's 4th? Then he's down to 30kg, and that's not so much in my opinion.

As for everyone who "criticizes" the "Prost approach" of the championship, I take you guys know about SuperGT, right? They run ballast in both qualifying and races (and I believe there is, or at least used to be, ballast for the fastest qualifiers), and they have A LOT of strategy going on. Teams qualifying low in the grid just so they don't get ballast, but still trying to be ahead enough so they can fight for the win; some others try to finish around 3rd or 4th in the races, just so they keep their chances high with no ballast, only to give it their all in the last one or two races, etc.

This is SuperGT, and it's more than just racing. It's also thinking which position may suit you because of the ballast. And I don't know about you guys, but I find it utterly interesting.

Good points, but we need take into account the fact that GT5 is far from simulating many things, including tire wear. Tire wear is more extreme in the game than in real life. We don't even know how realistic the ballast system is in the game. It probably works in a totally different way.

I just think keeping things as simple as possible is the way to go. Don't start thinking of too many things, and put them as you could end up ruining everything. I am in favor of ballast to a certain measure. If it is abused then forget it, might as well not have it. Just my 2 cents
 
On the note of peneltys I would like there to be none personally as I just want to race but if there is going to be peneltys then I think it should be something like a PP penelty. Makes things smoother when getting the cars on the grid at the start.
 
Stretch its allways been like this since S2 not sure if ballast was in S1 though.. (Aderrrm for e.g won at monaco with 180kgs ballast in Gt300s :crazy:)
 
I'm down for whatever really, if its there I'm not bothered if its there so be it. Worded my post badly :D
 
Stretch its allways been like this since S2 not sure if ballast was in S1 though.. (Aderrrm for e.g won at monaco with 180kgs ballast in Gt300s :crazy:)

good god, 180kg's added on monaco?! wow, must have ran a hella loose set-up wow.
 
Guys, just have a look at PURE | JGTS.. It's like you starting up a season with ballast for the first time.
The only thing the ballast at these levels will do is to make the really fast drivers fight a tad more. They will still be faster. It's not a case where a fast driver ends up in D2 just because he have to quali with 60 kg ballast..
Ok, 200 kg is perhaps a bit much. We set the limit to 120 kg, and it's working just fine.

Ballast does'nt have near as big impact as some of you want to put forth.
What does have impact is the concistancy (skill) of the drivers.
 
Guys, just have a look at PURE | JGTS.. It's like you starting up a season with ballast for the first time.
The only thing the ballast at these levels will do is to make the really fast drivers fight a tad more. They will still be faster. It's not a case where a fast driver ends up in D2 just because he have to quali with 60 kg ballast..
Ok, 200 kg is perhaps a bit much. We set the limit to 120 kg, and it's working just fine.

Ballast does'nt have near as big impact as some of you want to put forth.
What does have impact is the concistancy (skill) of the drivers.
Spot-On.


Skill should not be penalized in any form of sport. In Motorsport, ballast penalties are used to equalize the performance of the cars, not the drivers. So if the cars are all equal, there shouldn't be any ballast penalties. I believe everyone agrees with this.

Now, in our case, i can see some form of subtle ballast penalties to be given in order to make the racing and championship standings more interesting but NOT with the extreme system that is proposed. My views are:

-If victory is to be penalized so heavily, then it should be rewarded accordingly. The current points system does not do that.
I do agree, as I said, in my case, you can potentially be better off not placing in the top three with the current ballast system of 20/40/60. Absolutely, because when you have ballast it becomes a 40KG swing between 4rd and 4th, hence my idea for 15/30/45/60, which it still a little extreme.

-When a driver misses a race, ballast should be removed, not remain intact. Even with dropping the worst results, missing a race still hurts your overall chances.
I agree, the current listed amount is only 1 dropped round, there's nothing to gain from intentionally skipping a race, only to be lost.

-Weight ballast is not affecting only pace, but tirewear too, and with the current(2.02) extreme tirewear system we have, the disadvantage of 100 kg, let alone 200kg is insane. I would rather drive a hovercraft.
Of course, hovercrafts have awesome tread life. :D
But actually, I don't mind it at 90KG, I don't know what it's like higher, but it makes me think more for whatever reason. I also like how the car behaves around 1150KG best. I think if they all weighed 1200KG and I got used to that, I'd like that best even.
With the mods in Pure, they're a bit twitchy for me at stock weight.

-Qualifying should be done without ballast. Enforcing ballast can put the driver out of contention of the extra 3,2,1 points, which, with the current points system, are of great importance.
Yes, qualifying was confirmed with ballast before the season, I'm not sure who or why they brought that up. It was discussed pretty thoroughly in the pre-season thread and highly agreed ballast was needed for quali.

- Ballast enforced on the Finals is completely absurd. At that stage, all the drivers are winners or runner-ups of their division, and they should have no problem keeping the races interesting, if that's the case.
I agree, I seem to have missed when or that it was decided. :confused:


PS. On PURE JGTS, we are using a similar points/ballast system. I never raised any points there as i had neglected to check the system until after the first race of the season, and therefore it would be just rude to comment on a system that was already applied in Round 1.
It has proven pretty effective there too. I think 200 was decided to give the most possible drivers a chance into the finals, basically demanding the fastest have to lose a couple races.
I think with the prizes it'll make for some intense races throughout the season, certainly.
I favor a 150KG limit myself. Also something more like 10, 20, 30, 40 for GT300 and 10, 30, 50 for GT500.

Good discussion.

If using total score for the event, will "qual" and "fastest lap" points also be included?
If using total score, it also needs to be stated what happens if two drivers end up on the same score for the event.
Lastly, also state if ballast will be reduced given a lower placing in the results.

Looking forward to see the final ballast rule.
I think it absolutely has to. It's proven pretty common, we even had Litchi pull off a 4-5 finish in a combo, getting the third most points in the process.
Done any other way it makes getting pole and fastest lap, then finishing just out of ballast range a perfect strategy. :scared:
 
Last edited:
Also well said Dom, im sorta with you on the ballast for the finals though it sounded strange. (Not that I will get top 4 :lol: with John, Mole, Nep and Cicua)
 
important​
playstation network maintanance tomorrow 2pm gmt til 7am friday morning.

please try to qualify tonight if possible​
]
 
Ok no problem Twisted.. (Why Sony! I allways qual on Thursdays 👎)
 
Race 1 is coming closer and closer. What's the ballast/points system going to be?

On another note, reading the regs i noticed that there will be no raining at all. How come?
 
Fat Tony its because last seasons Nords wet race was a hellish race (100% wet from lap 3 onwards :scared:) So it was decided it was just a drive of attrition not a fun race at all so we decided to bin weather.
 
The points system is already in place. The ballast us in the process if being finalised.
After last seasons race at the ring, masi stated that there would be no more weather races only time day/night.
 
I got there first Twisted :P. Though it was the only race I won which I was very happy with ;).
 
There was already a debate on the point structure a couple of months ago. How the points are now is what was decided upon. I understand what Scanny means, but the season starts on Friday. The points will work fine as they are.
 
Any rooms up? If not I'll get one up in the next 30 minutes.

Will need a steward sometime soon and I can stick around for anybody wanting to quali. 👍

1472 - 6681 - 3158 - 0097 - 7291
 
Last edited:
Joshua1994
Any rooms up? If not I'll get one up in the next 30 minutes.

Will need a steward sometime soon and I can stick around for anybody wanting to quali. 👍

1472 - 6681 - 3158 - 0097 - 7291

Josh we don't use open rooms anymore, we use the lounges of the 4 accounts that twisted created (WSGTC-PAL-1 & 2, WSGTC-NTSC-1 & 2) for races and quali/practice

We typically use PAL 1 room for quali so just jump in there and see if a steward is around (I assume you've added the above accounts to your friends on psn?) I wont be there for another 2 hours or so but someone else may be
 
Josh we don't use open rooms anymore, we use the lounges of the 4 accounts that twisted created (WSGTC-PAL-1 & 2, WSGTC-NTSC-1 & 2) for races and quali/practice

We typically use PAL 1 room for quali so just jump in there and see if a steward is around (I assume you've added the above accounts to your friends on psn?) I wont be there for another 2 hours or so but someone else may be

I really need to read up, been such a noob lately.. embarrassing hahaha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back