Actually try fully heating them with the buns. That soggy bun is part of it because after they flip the meat they put the top bun on and then when they finish they put the whole thing together on the griddle and slide it to the side or back, sitting in the juices, until your entire order is ready and then plate/bag it all at once. Plus, the onions can stick to the bun, but are cooked with the burger.
I feel bad for anybody who hasn't experienced eating 15 of them, then running like a maniac into the bathroom a few hours later. They're worth the struggle.
White Castle burgers are terrible, at least imo.
I see most of you are a Harold or Kumar.
You should change your username cause you're clearly a fake.
EDIT: Wow, way off topic now. Or is it?
orimarcTalking about food on a marijuana thread? On-topic, 100%.
sumbrownkidif you want your stomach to hate you then you go to white castle.
The president has instructed federal authorities not to prosecute marijuana use in Colorado and Washington:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/14/usa-marijuana-obama-idUSL1E8NE42B20121214
AdrenalineI'm going to apologize as this is off topic, but I've been told it's the only place I'm allowed to discuss it...
I'm actually curious as to what constitutes an illegal substance by GTP definition? Assuming the poster lives in a state and/or area where the substance isn't actually illegal, or possesses the proper qualifications to legally own said substance, is it still against AUP to speak of it?
The final choice on if any topic breaks the AUP or not is down to the staff. However as far as this topic goes feel free to discuss the subject at length and the pros and cons behind its status as a drug (i.e. why it should or should not be made legal in the various parts of the world. However I would caution great care is discussing personal use of any substance that is of varying legality across the US, and would go as far as to strongly recommend that you don't do so.I'm going to apologize as this is off topic, but I've been told it's the only place I'm allowed to discuss it...
I'm actually curious as to what constitutes an illegal substance by GTP definition? Assuming the poster lives in a state and/or area where the substance isn't actually illegal, or possesses the proper qualifications to legally own said substance, is it still against AUP to speak of it?
Your not a member of staff and as such it would be appreciated if you would refrain from tell members what they can and can't post.No. Not a discussion like this.
Thank you for taking the time to respond Scaff, I do appreciate it.The final choice on if any topic breaks the AUP or not is down to the staff. However as far as this topic goes feel free to discuss the subject at length and the pros and cons behind its status as a drug (i.e. why it should or should not be made legal in the various parts of the world. However I would caution great care is discussing personal use of any substance that is of varying legality across the US, and would go as far as to strongly recommend that you don't do so.
Thank you for taking the time to respond Scaff, I do appreciate it.
I have not, nor will not discuss any use of the substance in question. I'm only questioning the GTP logistics of using a(n) AUP that doesn't apply. If the substance is in fact legal, how can they be violating the AUP or TOS agreement that you've referred them to?
Oh sorry Scaff I didn't mean it like that. I was just thinking for how long this thread has been up just using that as a reference. Only reason I said that. Sorry i guessScaffYour not a member of staff and as such it would be appreciated if you would refrain from tell members what they can and can't post.