- 44,185
- Blackburn
- Furinkazen_54
Only read this page of the forum today, so what's the script with Project Cars? Are we getting more DLC in the future or not?
DLC stops in 4 months. No classic Spa or Solitude. Ovals a 50% chance.
Only read this page of the forum today, so what's the script with Project Cars? Are we getting more DLC in the future or not?
I agree with this. It's not the cutting of future content that's the problem, it's that they made everyone believe from before the game launched that things were coming to the game that they never got into it in the end.
It reminds me a lot of PD failing to deliver the course maker quick enough for most people to enjoy. It's just another in a long line of PR blunders. The worst part of it for them is getting people to trust them on their next game.
I still love Pcars, but I'm massively disappointed that it won't become as good as it deserved to be. I'll be doing the same thing with 2 that I will be with the next GT game. Not buying it day 1, just waiting to find out if it's worth it first.
Only read this page of the forum today, so what's the script with Project Cars? Are we getting more DLC in the future or not?
"Well... gotta buy the next full price game, lolol"
DLC stops in 4 months. No classic Spa or Solitude. Ovals a 50% chance.
We will, but a lot has been scrapped and moved to Project Cars 2, like the rest of the historic tracks (Monza, Spa, Solitude), custom championship editor and possibly ovals, since they are struggling with the Ai.
Overall reaction by SMS:
I find it amazing that a company would announce content without knowing it can be delivered. That is always going to end badly as it is, without being rude, just plain stupid.The best thing SMS could have done is stayed silent about future DLC and features. Then we wouldn't be outraged since no one would know. Also, the DLC would be a surprise and not leaked early on, thus no hype .
I probably won't be investing in PCars 2 unless it is at a price where if it is quite bad then I can't really dispute.Does anyone actually believe pCARS 2 will have all this stuff in it? I don't.
I find it amazing that a company would announce content without knowing it can be delivered. That is always going to end badly as it is, without being rude, just plain stupid.
Does anyone actually believe pCARS 2 will have all this stuff in it? I don't.
I think Ian and devs actually thought that they could add this stuff. I think they found out that their game engine has limitations and they found out the hard way. There is a reason why every time something was added or changed it didnt go 100% smooth
Same as any other game, buy it for what is in it at launch, wait for reviews if you're uncertain, come to GTP and you'll know within days what the issues are with the game, if any. Anyone that pre-orders a game or buys it day 1 without waiting for reviews from users (not reviewers) is taking a small risk. Goes for any game really, but from past history I suspect many sim racers will be extra cautious when it comes to Project Cars 2 for various reasons.Does anyone actually believe pCARS 2 will have all this stuff in it? I don't.
Same as any other game, buy it for what is in it at launch, wait for reviews if you're uncertain, come to GTP and you'll know within days what the issues are with the game, if any. Anyone that pre-orders a game or buys it day 1 without waiting for reviews from users (not reviewers) is taking a small risk. Goes for any game really, but from past history I suspect many sim racers will be extra cautious when it comes to Project Cars 2 for various reasons.
And at the same time developers like PD are being roasted for doing exactly this (staying silent). So from a devs perspective it really doesn't matter how you go about it: you will get roasted either way. So in reality, there is no right way to do this. Stay silent: get flamed. Be transparent: get flamed.The best thing SMS could have done is stayed silent about future DLC and features. Then we wouldn't be outraged since no one would know. Also, the DLC would be a surprise and not leaked early on, thus no hype .
They really can't afford not to release oval tracks in one form or the other after all the marketing and hype that went it.Also, from the look of it, if ovals do come, they will be time trial and online only. AI was the reason given for Ian's doubts about the ovals coming, and when asked if they could perhaps release them for online and time trial only to avoid the AI issues, Ian said that was his "cunning plan".
And at the same time developers like PD are being roasted for doing exactly this (staying silent). So from a devs perspective it really doesn't matter how you go about it: you will get roasted either way. So in reality, there is no right way to do this. Stay silent: get flamed. Be transparent: get flamed.
Is anybody really gonna be happy with ovals in online racing with those sucky magnetic collisions between cars? Guess it will be ovals for hotlapping only then, if they come...
Oh and about the Laguna BTCC being apparently unavailable for references. Well, with 30 seconds of googling you can find a Laguna BTCC that is used in hillclimbs since 2010 and located close to one of SMS empoyees. http://www.wiebe-motorsport.de/cms/content/blogcategory/10/13/ There also was another one at Goodwood 2014: http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2014/06/29/non-f1-cars-2014-goodwood-festival-speed/renault-laguna-btcc/
Yeah I found the whole Laguna debacle a bit suspicious. I thought "how could it be too hard to find a reference car for that, they should be able to find one in their backyard being that it's a BTCC car". Look at how rare some of the cars PD got their hands on were, and I know they've got much more money, but still, the Laguna would be so much easier than many of the rare cars in GT games.
Yeah I found the whole Laguna debacle a bit suspicious. I thought "how could it be too hard to find a reference car for that, they should be able to find one in their backyard being that it's a BTCC car". Look at how rare some of the cars PD got their hands on were, and I know they've got much more money, but still, the Laguna would be so much easier than many of the rare cars in GT games.
How is that not a big deal?I remember a PS1 or PS2 game that had, "Road U.S.A" and "Road Geargia"
If the ovals come with road courses it will be extremely enticing, and even with the magnetising between cars its not really that big of a deal on an oval, because if wheels get tangled 11 out of 10 times both cars end up in the wall,
Thing is, when you're in R&D that's pretty much standard. You're doing stuff that's never been done before. The real problem is that they technically painted themselves in a corner so to speak. I'm quite sure they were able to deliver on their promises earlier in the whole process, but optimizations, features, etc. made it impossible at a later date. So I think it's not so much a communication issue, but their development process being broken (not just QA, but dev/design/vision as well).I agree with you on your point about they're damned if they do and damned if they don't when it comes to communication, but the real problem wasn't them communicating with the fans, it was committing to features they didn't know for a fact they could deliver.
How is that not a big deal?
@HammyMansell I never knew those cars where competing again. That's some of my Christmas Eve viewing sorted then.
Saying they couldn't source the car is BS and a cop-out. I wonder if that video has been posted on the PCars forum.
@HammyMansell I never knew those cars where competing again. That's some of my Christmas Eve viewing sorted then.
Saying they couldn't source the car is BS and a cop-out. I wonder if that video has been posted on the PCars forum.
Thing is, when you're in R&D that's pretty much standard. You're doing stuff that's never been done before. The real problem is that they technically painted themselves in a corner so to speak. I'm quite sure they were able to deliver on their promises earlier in the whole process, but optimizations, features, etc. made it impossible at a later date. So I think it's not so much a communication issue, but their development process being broken (not just QA, but dev/design/vision as well).
For sure many of the older BTCC cars are available for referencing, as you can see from this YT video of the "Super Touring Car Championship" that was revived last year and has been going this year too. And as you can see, a Renault Laguna has been taking part the whole time!