Quite frankly, I believe these harsh criticisms towards Maldonado are unjustified. Indeed, he made errors. Quite a few in fact, I'll be honest. Overall however, his pace was decent. Seven times during the season, he out qualified Barrichello, on merit. For a rookie, that isn't at all disappointing. Even when beaten by his team in qualifying, Maldonado wasn't always left wanting. On some occasions, the time difference between him and Rubens wasn't exactly what you would call substantial. Another interesting point to note is that, had Hamilton not foolishly wiped him out during the closing stages at Monaco, Maldonado could well have out scored Rubens this season. Of course, it isn't all about points, race-by-race performance is key. By observing his races this season, you'll realize that, he hasn't been anywhere near as awful as some people suggest. In truth, he's performed quite well, especially when you consider that the Williams FW33 was by far the worst car in the field to be produced by an established team.
Nice post, and I to agree that a lot of the criticism torwards Maldonado is a bit unjustified (a lot of it probably just stems from people not liking his personality or the "evil eyes" or the fact that he's a pay driver) ...especially some who think he's so bad he doesn't belong in F1 and such. It's a bit annoying to see how much flak he gets, particularly considering that his performance this year on the whole hasn't been all that bad in absolute dog of a car, and in pure pace (which is probably the most important thing to show as a rookie) he has shown a fair bit of potential most would say.
IMO, I don't see how Petrov (I am a rather big critic of him) really did any better in his rookie season on the whole (having a GREAT car only gave him cover from criticism in my view), yet I saw so many people saying that he should be given a second year to prove himself...yet what has he really done this year, other than proving to be a mediocre driver that should probably be driving in one of the lower teams (if things were based on driving merit alone). The fact that he has had this comfortable seat at LRGP for 2 years, while so many others (Sutil, Barichello, Di Resta, Hulkenburg, Alguesuari, Buemi, etc.) have had to fight tooth and nail just to stay in F1, let alone for one of the top teams, only annoys me further
Not this again. Maldonado intentionally hit or at least tried to spook Hamilton. It couldn't be more clear-cut.
I don't think Maldonado has been the worst driver to grace F1, and his rookie season wasn't much worse than Hulkenburg's. Williams could have a lot worse than Maldonado really.
I agree. With that said, I'd would have liked to have seen any of the other rookies over the past 2 years do much better than he has done this year in that dog of a Williams.
The provoking was after that chicane, as they came round la source Hamilton edged over to Maldonado twice, there is a bit of analysis in this:
http://bbs.hellof1.com/2683377.html
I think a lot of the provoking was probably done at Monaco, when Hamilton was expecting everyone to pull over for him that day. Maldonado was on track to get a great result at Monaco, until the controversial dive bomb by Hamilton. I doubt Hamilton apologized for that, which probably only angered Pastor further (as with what happened with Massa). And from there, things hit a boiling point at Spa.
In all honesty, to an extent I commend Maldonado for at least sticking up for himself against one of the big names in the sport, even if it meant tarnishing his reputation to a good degree. I personally rather see a driver fight back than just bend over and be another drivers lap dog
![LOL :lol: :lol:](/wp-content/themes/gtp16/images/smilies/lol.svg?v=3)
And what the hell, in the end it was just more entertainment/drama (something people really get off on) for the viewers anyway.