Danoff
Premium
- 34,011
- Mile High City
Implying that an employer accepting a union contract could be extortion is like implying that an employer accepting a capital contract could be extortion. If purchasing an expensive machine is extortion because the other option is not getting the machine, then I guess we're all a bunch of extortionists.
Government has the power to extort public funds because not only do they legislate it but they also enforce it. Private sector employers are free to accept or not accept a union contract - the contract is not legislation and neither party has the power to enforce its acceptance. It's just a contact. Law is not merely a contract.
Extortion was @Eunos_Cosmo's word.
I think you're missing a key distinction here, but I'm trying to make sure that I'm following your line of thinking. Employment with the government does not appear to be any different from employment with a private company from this particular perspective. It's just a contract, not law. Public sector employees are also free to accept or not accept a union contract. Are you saying that you think that public unions should not be compulsory through law? That's a different argument.